Imagine thinking that comparing a young player to Patrick Kane is an insultIm pretty confident that it's the posters comparing Bedard to Cliff Ronning and Pat Kane that are going to be the ones eating receipts. Perhaps in a few months even.
Imagine thinking that comparing a young player to Patrick Kane is an insultIm pretty confident that it's the posters comparing Bedard to Cliff Ronning and Pat Kane that are going to be the ones eating receipts. Perhaps in a few months even.
Uh, which media were you reading? Don't gaslight the thread creator with this.No
And no he wasnt
Gotta wonder when these Faber Drivers are gonna stop trying to find a way to meritlessly inject their boy into these sacred Bedard diatribes, when there are so many more enticing players to cross-project....and Faber played the last 2 months of the season with broken ribs.
Gotta wonder when these Faber Drivers are gonna stop trying to find a way to meritlessly inject their boy into these sacred Bedard diatribes, when there are so many more enticing players to cross-project.
It doesn't offend me. But i think it's like comparing Mcdavid to Johnathan Teows in 2015.I'm sorry, maybe I missed it....but when did junior numbers become a criteria for the Calder trophy?
Obviously, Bedard will be a better player than Cliff Ronning, but you are the one that keeps touting his "generational" junior numbers, not me.
I think Kane is a good comparable. Both offensively great, but a little on the smaller side, physically. Bedard might end up with slightly better numbers. Kane is a career PPG and an overall elite player (and one of my favorite all time players), not sure why that comparison offends you.
It doesn't offend me. But i think it's like comparing Mcdavid to Johnathan Teows in 2015.
Kane is a lower tier than Kucherov for peak, prime, playoffs, all-time listing etcIt's nothing like that at all. Bedard is NOT the next McDavid, Crosby or Ovechkin. If you think Bedard will finish his career on that level, I'm sorry, but you are definitely overrating him.
Patrick Kane is an all-time elite player in this league....on a much higher tier than Toews. To be compared with Kane should be a compliment, not an insult.
He definitely was on these boards.Bedard was never expected to be on the level of Sid or McDavid, he was hyped up as the next best thing, however.
He's essentially Kaner with AM34's shot and playing at center.
We’ll see about him at center. I really don’t think it matters if he plays C or not. He will drive the game and I think the idea that guys that don’t play C somehow failed is crazy. Seems pretty Canadian driven that the best players all have to be at C. Isn’t that way in Europe or Russia.
He also out scored Jack Hughes first two seasons in his first season, in like half the games. So being “lucky” to be better than Jack Hughes seems like an awfully shallow prediction at this stage.
Only people that were saying that were the people who didn't look at who his teammates were.He definitely was on these boards.
Som people were saying 90-100 point rookie season.
The hype was through the roof.
He definitely was on these boards.
Som people were saying 90-100 point rookie season.
The hype was through the roof.
Doesn't mean people weren't massively hyping the hell out of this kid. He was absolutely seen as the next McDavid going into the draft.Only people that were saying that were the people who didn't look at who his teammates were.
No no, the topic is if Bedard is underrated or not. This is probably not the right site to debate if Jesus Christ is underrated.Jesus Christ
Only people that were saying that were the people who didn't look at who his teammates were.
Yeah, still has tons of room to grow, 3rd youngest player in the NHL. McDavids rookie season wasn't some spectacular season either. Not saying he will become that, but i'm not sure what his rookie season even tells us in the long term.Doesn't mean people weren't massively hyping the hell out of this kid. He was absolutely seen as the next McDavid going into the draft.