Hart Trophy Tournament (1969-00) Round 1: 1992 Mark Messier vs 1995 Eric Lindros

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

Which Hart Trophy Winner had the better season?


  • Total voters
    31

blundluntman

Registered User
Jul 30, 2016
3,043
3,342
MATCHUP #15 (Round 1): Mark Messier (1992) vs Eric Lindros (1995)

Mark Messier (1991-92):

79 Games Played 35 Goals 72 Assists 107 Points | 5th in Points, 6th in Assists, Pearson/Lindsay, 1st AST, 9th in Selke

Eric Lindros (1994-95):
46 Games Played 29 Goals 41 Assists 70 Points | T-1st in Points, 4th in Assists, 6th in Goals, 1st AST


Round 1 Matchups:
69 Esposito vs 99 Jagr Thread
70 Orr vs 72 Orr Thread
71 Orr vs 00 Pronger Thread
73 Clarke vs 82 Gretzky Thread
74 Esposito vs 91 Hull Thread
75 Clarke vs 98 Hasek Thread
76 Clarke vs 90 Messier Thread
77 Lafleur vs 80 Gretzky (Still Active) Thread
78 Lafleur vs 93 Lemieux Thread
79 Trottier vs 94 Fedorov Thread
81 Gretzky vs 87 Gretzky Thread
83 Gretzky vs 86 Gretzky Thread
84 Gretzky vs 85 Gretzky Thread
88 Lemieux vs 89 Gretzky Thread
92 Messier vs 95 Lindros
96 Lemieux vs 97 Hasek
 

Deadly Dogma

All I have is substantially vapid opinions
Sponsor
May 3, 2016
8,900
5,183
Peak Lindros was just under the goats, too bad injuries kept him from playing at that level.
 

DitchMarner

TheGlitchintheSwitch
Jul 21, 2017
10,806
7,833
Brampton, ON
Seems pretty straight forward. Lindros ranked higher in goals, assists and points. What did Messier bring that makes up for the difference in offense? He may have been a bit better defensively, but I don't think that's enough. Lindros beats him in physicality as well.
 

bobholly39

Registered User
Mar 10, 2013
23,191
16,495
Eric Lindros

1995 is an underrated season. It was a very strong one - I really liked Jagr's season tremendously too. Probably ok with Lindros winning the hart, but I'd say it's 1A/1B.

In contrast - Messier had no business winning in 1992. Lemieux should have won. It's just an overrated season. Strong, but not as good as Lindros in 1995.

For what it's worth - I'm not punishing Lindros here for the shortened season. Because if we were to consider 48 games vs 80, it's probably enough to give Messier the edge.
 

Albatros

Registered User
Aug 19, 2017
13,458
8,779
Ostsee
I agree that Messier being the nearly unanimous choice in 1992 is a bit much given Leetch was arguably better in his own team, but I'll still take it over a lockout year.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad