Value of: Hampus Lindholm &/or Rickard Rakell Auction!

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/
Status
Not open for further replies.

spockBokk

Registered User
Sep 8, 2013
7,450
18,804
What? You think you can get a 1st pairing defensemen for less?

You can get 1st pairing D, many years younger and signed for 3 more years for just slightly more than the ask for rental Lindholm…
 

Taluss

Registered User
Jul 28, 2018
8,305
5,971
NYC
Anyone have an idea what Lindholm is looking for in his next deal? AAV and term?
 

Big Daddy Cane

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 8, 2010
14,006
34,052
Western PA
Actual Grade A top prospects among contenders are rare.

For that group of teams, that must mean a flavor of the year (a recent 1st that an organization/fanbase is hyping up because they don't have anything better to pump the tires on). It's not a crazy ask in the context of Chiarot.
 

bsu

"I have no idea what I am doing" -Pat VerBleak
Sep 27, 2017
28,539
29,293
I hope the Ducks just re-sign him. He's so damn underrated and an elite shutdown defensemen. Playing with 19 yr old Drysdale this year, Lindholm is -1 and his partner (who he has been paired with every single game) is -19.
 

Gliff

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 24, 2011
16,378
11,507
Middle Tennessee
You can get 1st pairing D, many years younger and signed for 3 more years for just slightly more than the ask for rental Lindholm…
Ya and Lindholm would be signed for 8 years in this scenario.

I would rather have Lindholm longterm then Chychrun for 3 years.
 

rocketdan9

Registered User
Feb 5, 2009
20,415
13,210
I hope the Ducks just re-sign him. He's so damn underrated and an elite shutdown defensemen. Playing with 19 yr old Drysdale this year, Lindholm is -1 and his partner (who he has been paired with every single game) is -19.
Not sure if its money or term

But sounds like Lindholm/agent want (on top of the cash) 7 or 8 years and NTC

But Ducks not willing to give both
 

GirardSpinorama

Registered User
Aug 20, 2004
21,596
10,617
What? You think you can get a 1st pairing defensemen for less?
With an extension, it's fine. Without it, I don't see anyone giving up a grade A prospect for rental. But then we all have different definition of what that is. I don't see anyone giving up a Bodqvist for example.
 

DucksUnited

Registered User
Mar 16, 2022
403
178
If I am Boston, I pay it IF there is a deal in place. Boston is in a weird place where they are contending AND have a young Pasta/McAvoy/Swayman core... but so badly need to keep picks to throw darts at trying to find their next #1C... so the extra 1st or whatever that Chychrun would demand might not be worth it.

Both teams make sense. Boston can afford 22’ late first + Lysell + 23’ second. Easy deal with Boston. No need to deal with Toronto when they keep wanting to throw the negative value of Mrazek in any shape or form of a trade
 
  • Like
Reactions: GirardSpinorama

DucksUnited

Registered User
Mar 16, 2022
403
178
Actual Grade A top prospects among contenders are rare.

For that group of teams, that must mean a flavor of the year (a recent 1st that an organization/fanbase is hyping up because they don't have anything better to pump the tires on). It's not a crazy ask in the context of Chiarot.

that’s why Boston makes the most sense. Lysell fills the asking price of Anaheims GM demands. Boston has all the pieces they are asking for. And you know Anaheims history! They love their Swedes and their Finn’s
 
  • Like
Reactions: GirardSpinorama

GirardSpinorama

Registered User
Aug 20, 2004
21,596
10,617
that’s why Boston makes the most sense. Lysell fills the asking price of Anaheims GM demands. Boston has all the pieces they are asking for

Ya a recent late first round pick whose tracking well is probably the best top prospect someone can get for a rental. Not gonna be a recent top 10 pick.
 

DucksUnited

Registered User
Mar 16, 2022
403
178
Ya a recent late first round pick whose tracking well is probably the best top prospect someone can get for a rental. Not gonna be a recent top 10 pick.

that’s why I would bet my bottom dollar Boston is being quiet. Let the Rangers, and Florida take all the headlines in the media. But Boston doesn’t play, they are always active during the deadline.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GirardSpinorama

TheStuntman

Registered User
Oct 27, 2015
708
603
Bumping this thread now that Lindholm got traded. What value does Rakell have? My guess is 2 2nds.
 

Sean Garrity

Quack Quack Quack!
Dec 25, 2007
17,526
6,183
Dee Eff UU
Bumping this thread now that Lindholm got traded. What value does Rakell have? My guess is 2 2nds.

I think the Ducks would be happy with that return, or 2nd +b/c prospect that Verbeek likes. Also, losing Des and Manson means the Ducks have no "enforcer" or tough guy that will stand up for teammates outside of Carrick so maybe a player like that as opposed to a prospect, but I'm just spitballing.
 

Leonardo87

New York Rangers, Anaheim Ducks, and TMNT fan.
Sponsor
Dec 8, 2013
40,179
62,710
New York
Would prefer a Top prospect back instead of picks. But a 2023 1st round would be nice.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad