ColtsNLeafs
Registered User
- Jul 20, 2022
- 72
- 82
With all due respect to Panwar, Brandt Clarke got robbed of POW......Look at his statline the last week.
I never quite thought of the idea of this potentially setting them up to stay if things are going well. It’s an interesting thought.The most interesting part of the announcement, to me, are the 3 1-year options to extend past the 2nd season.
Obviously they want to protect themselves if the Hamilton building isn't ready for 25-26, but to me it sounds like if it's going well in Brantford and they can get a new building there, this also covers them for that.
I am sure there will be lots of rumours and speculation until the dust finally settles. Really hoping they come back, but personally I have roots in Brantford and the ability to get there for games. Way better option than Brampton.Steelheads watching this with interest I bet.
Honestly, this is the biggest concern I have with this deal and may be a sign the Bulldogs move will be permanent.The most interesting part of the announcement, to me, are the 3 1-year options to extend past the 2nd season.
Obviously they want to protect themselves if the Hamilton building isn't ready for 25-26, but to me it sounds like if it's going well in Brantford and they can get a new building there, this also covers them for that.
Yeah, there is a lot that can be read into any part of this deal. Even if you stay past the original deal and save 3 million, you can't play in that building forever.Honestly, this is the biggest concern I have with this deal and may be a sign the Bulldogs move will be permanent.
"In the memorandum of understanding, the city will contribute $3 million from its “casino fund” to the arena upgrades, with the Bulldogs picking up the rest of the cost. If the Bulldogs decide to leave after three years, they will return the $3 million to the city."
That to me, seems like a steep penalty to pay, just to leave after you've stayed a year past the new facility's completion. Not that I would blame him if he did opt to. go down that road. Then again, that might not be that large a sum to Andlauer, especially after three years and the team coffers likely contributing to the cost.
I don't see why would wouldn't be able to play there for at least a while after the facility is upgraded, and you've been there six years, given Owen Sound seems to be able to make a go at it. Even then, a small expansion of the facility might not be that much.Yeah, there is a lot that can be read into any part of this deal. Even if you stay past the original deal and save 3 million, you can't play in that building forever.
So does Brantford pay all the costs of a new building and he waits for it?
What if Brantford asks him to pay 50% of a new building? Then sucking up the 3 million extra and coming back to a completed Hamilton building is way cheaper.
Just way too many moving parts to even guess. What if he wins the Ottawa bid and sells the Bulldogs?
I think that's the whole point of this deal, future flexibility.
This whole "3 year relocation" is a bit misleading as well. Half of '23, all of '24, and half of '25 may be "3 years", but it's not 3 seasons. Again, assuming building here is done on time and they come back.
I didn’t expect a name change, but it’s part of the agreement.
The first thing that comes to mind is when the Phoenix Coyotes changed their name when they moved from Phoenix to Glendale. It was part of the agreement with the city of Glendale to change the name to the Arizona Coyotes so that they didn’t have a misleading name. The difference with the Bulldogs is that this is meant to be a temporary relocation.
Not expansion... this is why I mentioned the Steelheads. Their lease is up at the end of the season. If they sign an extension for less than 5 years it wouldn't shock me if the Bulldogs stayed in Brantford and the Steelheads moved to Hamilton.Is there not also a possibility that the team stays there and an expansion team comes to Hamilton or vice versa?
Obviously an owner would have to be found, but if Brantford becomes a viable option I have a hard time believing that the league and city of Hamilton won't want a franchise here.
I didn’t expect a name change, but it’s part of the agreement.
The first thing that comes to mind is when the Phoenix Coyotes changed their name when they moved from Phoenix to Glendale. It was part of the agreement with the city of Glendale to change the name to the Arizona Coyotes so that they didn’t have a misleading name. The difference with the Bulldogs is that this is meant to be a temporary relocation.
NoIs there not also a possibility that the team stays there and an expansion team comes to Hamilton or vice versa?
Obviously an owner would have to be found, but if Brantford becomes a viable option I have a hard time believing that the league and city of Hamilton won't want a franchise here.
I’m not overly optimistic but I wouldn’t say I’m pessimistic about it either. Kind of on the fence while everything is fresh and details are coming out, but I’m leaning more on the optimistic side. 3 years (2 seasons) is a while away and anything can happen.I'm on the pessimistic side of this one, if the name is getting changed.
It's a weird thing to accept if the idea is a temporary relocation, just as the extra 3 years condition on the lease seems weird to me. This seems more like we are relocating, but leaving the door open to be wooed back, or go back if things don't work out here. It seems very clear to me Brantford's game plan is do everything possible to encourage them not to move back, as opposed to try them out and try to woo an expansion or relocation, but again, it's not like there are a lot of options here.
As a side note, hopefully the new First Ontario Center operators demand the Rock finally make that change if this precedent is getting set.
Anyways, I'd be interested to see what the official team stance and the league stance will be, but those cards won't be shown until the season is over.
At the end of the day, again, Michael Andlauer has been an exemplary owner who hasn't gotten the respect he has deserved from our city, and I can't fault him with whatever he decides, say nothing of what will happen should his bid for Ottawa succeed. I sincerely hope my instinct here is wrong, or at least if some relocation shuffle happens, Hamilton somehow manages to keep the Bulldogs name.
Highly unlikely you'll see expansion back into Hamilton.Is there not also a possibility that the team stays there and an expansion team comes to Hamilton or vice versa?
Obviously an owner would have to be found, but if Brantford becomes a viable option I have a hard time believing that the league and city of Hamilton won't want a franchise here.
Highly unlikely you'll see expansion back into Hamilton.
Unfortunately to the fans of the Bulldogs it will be a sad day on the horizon me thinks.
I wouldn't go that far. It's not like previous instances of the OHL in Hamilton where the team isn't breaking even. As far as I can tell, the team is doing above average attendance in an aged arena. Then add two high density developments planned that are within walking distance of the arena (the Booth Center replacement and the City Center redevelopment), one of which may contribute to cleaning up the area somewhat (as many people have expressed complaints about the Booth Center being right across the street) and I don't know if that's out of the realm of possibility.Highly unlikely you'll see expansion back into Hamilton.
Unfortunately to the fans of the Bulldogs it will be a sad day on the horizon me thinks.