I don’t get why they would wait so long to finally show the game off, and wait until 3 months before it has to be finished and go gold, and this is what they decide to put out. Why not show the latest and greatest graphics? I don’t expect a TON to change within 3 short months..It's a demo. Earlier build. I took part in the Ghost Recon Breakpoint closed Beta earlier this year. It didn't look near as good as the finished game.
Good news, launching without multiplayer would not be good.
I don’t get why they would wait so long to finally show the game off, and wait until 3 months before it has to be finished and go gold, and this is what they decide to put out. Why not show the latest and greatest graphics? I don’t expect a TON to change within 3 short months..
The reason they waited is because everyone has known this game is launching with the new system. The new system hasn’t even been fully announced with price and date yet. You don’t show off the game before all that stuff. In a normal year, we probably would have seen this earlier, but its not a normal year.I don’t get why they would wait so long to finally show the game off, and wait until 3 months before it has to be finished and go gold, and this is what they decide to put out. Why not show the latest and greatest graphics? I don’t expect a TON to change within 3 short months..
HFBoards falls for fake news and panics. Again. In other news, water is wet.
That still wouldn't make up for no multiplayer at launch.
As I said, it's not unusual and it's understandable.
The reason they waited is because everyone has known this game is launching with the new system. The new system hasn’t even been fully announced with price and date yet. You don’t show off the game before all that stuff. In a normal year, we probably would have seen this earlier, but its not a normal year.
Everyone wants to talk about the graphics but the framerate looked real smooth to me. As long as the game is fun and runs smoothly, I’m good.
Hmm...
If the source isn't sure or credible, why should they?
Hmmmmmmmmmm....
Did anyone else say that the source was credible? We were all (including you) discussing the implications of multiplayer not being included. Not sure why you need to try to distance yourself from that.
Looks like the demo was a section of the final game. So maybe not an early build like some are thinking?
Halo Infinite has been built entirely on our new Slipspace Engine, which was designed from the ground up to serve as the foundation for the future of the franchise. The technical enhancements of the Slipspace Engine are too extensive to truly get into here, but one callout is how we are now able to pack in 10 times the processing per pixel, creating the most visually rich game we’ve ever made to go with the most open and expansive environment to appear in a Halo game. That’s just the start though, as Xbox Velocity Architecture brings near instant loading, Smart Delivery will pull the optimal version for your device, and we will be running campaign at 60FPS with up to 4K resolution. We are also designing Halo Infinite to grow and evolve over time so we can continue to deliver experiences to our players well beyond launch. This is the most technically advanced Halo game ever created, paired with the most powerful console on the planet, allowing us to create the most vivid and immersive way to experience our universe.
I know that. Which is why I stated that in my original post. Also, what does a game being open world have anything to do with what the game looks like? If people think the game looks rather lackluster, them knowing its an open world game isn't going to change anything.It's talking about the demo.
Halo Infinite - Campaign Evolved
By the way, are people just ignoring that it's an open world game?
I know that. Which is why I stated that in my original post. Also, what does a game being open world have anything to do with what the game looks like? If people think the game looks rather lackluster, them knowing its an open world game isn't going to change anything.
Probably because its been overshadowed by the lackluster visuals.I didn't say that. Just saying the game being open world should be talked about.
Probably because its been overshadowed by the lackluster visuals.
Xbox Marketing GM Aaron Greenberg responded to criticism about Infinite's graphics, saying: "Listen, we're in the middle of a global pandemic. It's July, we're far from [launch in] Holiday, you're seeing a work-in-progress game."
“ The other thing I'll just say is: it is a work-in-progress. I can tell you, because we see build check-ins every week, and they make progress week after week, so between now and Holiday it's just going to get better and better."
Aaron responds to feedback “ It's very hard to show the full power and graphical fidelity of what Xbox Series X will be able to deliver for you over a stream. Go back and look at it in 4K 60," referring to the fact that the stream was delivered live in 1080p, but the gameplay premiere can be viewed in 4K 60 FPS on the Halo YouTube channel.
More here:
Halo Infinite Demo Was a Work-in-Progress Build, But Running on a PC as Powerful as Series X - IGN
To be fair, the bigger the scale of the game, the less fine detail you tend to get.
The best looking games tend to be the ones with smaller areas with a lot of developer-control over where you can go, and when things happen.
That COULD be a factor here, but that still ignores the fact there is a generational jump happening, so you'd want THIS open-world game to look substantially better than current-gen open-world games. And I don't think it looks SUBSTANTIALLY better than say, GTA5 or the latest AC games.
ya, thats all im saying. Im not expecting the game to look perfect especially when it was originally supposed to be made for current gen but when Microsofts flagship title looks so lackluster when they have been pushing this "Most powerful console ever" narrative, it just seems rather disappointing is all.To be fair, the bigger the scale of the game, the less fine detail you tend to get.
The best looking games tend to be the ones with smaller areas with a lot of developer-control over where you can go, and when things happen.
That COULD be a factor here, but that still ignores the fact there is a generational jump happening, so you'd want THIS open-world game to look substantially better than current-gen open-world games. And I don't think it looks SUBSTANTIALLY better than say, GTA5 or the latest AC games.
Cyberpunk 2077 shows what an open world next-gen game can look like.
and the fact that it hasn't tells you what?That game was also supposed to have been out already.