In the 2nd yes but it was even for the majority of the 3rd nd the Bruins were clearly the better team in the first.
The Bruins lost so it is the same Bruins suck narrative and anything they did well goes ignored.
We strongly disagree here.
- the Bruins fought the puck ALL night... bouncing off their sticks, misfiring on passes and receiving them, tripping over the blueline, Chara with time and space and he makes it look as though his stick was made out of Cheesestring.
- dig the puck out of the corner in the offensive zone, force it back to the point... shot is either easily blocked, Price has no one in front of him so he sees it all the way, or the shot is a total muffin that Price could have had with his back turned to the shooter, or combination of any/all of these three
- no puck support in the defensive zone and a stuttering disability to turn possession into transition from anywhere around Tuukka
- puck along the boards and the Bruins look like a Midget team trying to get the puck away from the Habs, skating in and hacking away at the puck. When what they SHOULD be doing, is hammering their man into the boards and forcing him to make a play
- lines with no chemistry... too many times I counted too many men in one single area of the ice. Either no attention to structure, no confidence in it, or no idea where each other are/are supposed to be on the ice
I won't sit there and say that they didn't care. I don't believe that to be the case. Tuukka played well, Pastrnak did some things that surprised me. I think the team wanted to win. But they sucked. They flat-out sucked.