Most 10 goals scorer but only 2 20 goals scorer. And will most likely finish the season with just 2 20 goals scorers yet again just like the last 2 seasons.
2.94 g/gp, 16th in NHL
Last year - 2.83 g/gp, 26th
2 years ago - 2.77 g/go, 26th
So empirically, we are considerably better at scoring goals that the last 2 seasons.
This is the problem with emotional takes not grounded in reality...
When I say lack of depth, this applies across the board. No 2nd line like you said. A good 4th line does not make up for the deficiencies across the other 2 lines.
Sure. I think we agree in principle. I just don't agree with your description of this as a "depth" issue.
Wether or not depth makes up for a lack of top end talent is a very different question. 100% agree that top end talent is more important than depth when it comes to winning a cup, but, depth is an important factor... Especially in building a long term contender.
Top 6th depth & roster depth are two different things, I think the nuance is more than semantics.
Struble, Savard and Xhekaj are bottom pair guys at best. Yet again lack of depth (Hutson and Matheson need to play a lot).
Those 3 aren't, or shouldn't be, top 4 dmen right now... Agreed.
And, they are as good or better than the bottom pairing options on most of the playoff team rosters.
Good depth, mediocre top 4
Wow 4th most used forward but worst +\- by double the amount and 7th in points. He should be proud.
I doubt it. He's likely harder on himself than the peanut gallery
Imagine using TOI as an indicator of use to a team when that player, who provides ZERO value defensively, was on pace for 30 points.
I guess you've never played or coached high level sport...
Might want to do some research and broaden your understanding of sport
The only thing his TOI indicates is that he is seen as slightly better than Christian Dvorak.
No, the only thing it definitively indicates is how much time he spent on the ice.
Newsflash - the game is played on the ice
