I understand it, and this time it did not hit with the 90s rando tracks.If you don't understand the underline theme of the music in the 3 movies well that's on you.
Art is subjective in many ways but this, pretty much like any movie, is art by the basic definition of the wordI understand it, and this time it did not hit with the 90s rando tracks.
Changed their main composer, so not much was to be expected.
Anyway, that's enough for me about this "art." Cool, awesome, will make billions!
I will remember it as fondly as my last good restaurant meal.
Yeah I get it, I'm not here to debate that.Art is subjective in many ways but this, pretty much like any movie, is art by the basic definition of the word
[noncount] : something that is created with imagination and skill and that is beautiful or that expresses important ideas or feelings
the arts : painting, sculpture, music, theater, literature, etc., considered as a group of activities done by people with skill and imagination
I just saw it and I agree best overall field since End Game.Very good way to end the GOTG saga. Definitely the best of the new phase movies by far. Those Rocket flashbacks were tough to see.
And that's why people say it is subjective. Some people like certain movies, paintings, sculptures, etc. while others don't. You can not like it and it does not mean you don't like art, I agree with you on that, you might not like or love or whatever this movie as an individual piece of art.Yeah I get it, I'm not here to debate that.
It was mostly a retort at the parrot copy/pasting "Sorry you don't like art" or something to that effect because I didn't "11/10, AMAZING!, I CRIED EVEN MORE THAN KEVIN SMITH!!!" at this particular movie.
Don't forget that you're on HFBoards, where people don't like when other people LIKE stuff that they don't. Especially in movie related topics, looking down at people who like "popular" or "pop corn" movies, is very common.And that's why people say it is subjective. Some people like certain movies, paintings, sculptures, etc. while others don't. You can not like it and it does not mean you don't like art, I agree with you on that, you might not like or love or whatever this movie as an individual piece of art.
I thought Mantis was terrible. Overacting, and not in a fun way. That and it dragged quite a bit. Otherwise, enjoyed it. Much better than the rest of whatever the phase were in now. I wish I didn't know the songs list beforehand, some of them were pure bliss.I enjoyed much of the comedic aspect, with Drax, Mantis and Nebula delivering.
Isn't it up to each individual to decide what they consider "art"?I thought Mantis was terrible. Overacting, and not in a fun way. That and it dragged quite a bit. Otherwise, enjoyed it. Much better than the rest of whatever the phase were in now. I wish I didn't know the songs list beforehand, some of them were pure bliss.
As for "art"... That's an hilarious defense for a commercial product that - even though belonging to an artistic field - is pretty much at the complete opposite of what any sane person would consider an "art film", or an artistic achievement.
I guess that's a door my beloved Marcel Duchamp opened wide and that it's useless to try and close it now. But I think even the purest believer wouldn't dare compare Fontaine to Étant donné (or defend the former with arguments such as "too bad you don't like art").Isn't it up to each individual to decide what they consider "art"?
I didn't even say it wasn't art. I just said it was hilarious to use its artistic merits as its sole defense. I guess Spurlock didn't like fine cuisine either.Dismissing art that is not up to your personal tastes as 'not-art' is in itself an art form
Since you obviously don't understand the ART of comic books, what the MCU have been doing is basically cramming up decades of character development and history into a movie series, in some cases a trilogy (Iron Man, Spider-Man, Cap) which is a very tough task and short cuts have to be taken due to available screentime but to me they've done a remarkable job at it so far.I guess that's a door my beloved Marcel Duchamp opened wide and that it's useless to try and close it now. But I think even the purest believer wouldn't dare compare Fontaine to Étant donné (or defend the former with arguments such as "too bad you don't like art").
I didn't even say it wasn't art. I just said it was hilarious to use its artistic merits as its sole defense. I guess Spurlock didn't like fine cuisine either.
When it comes to art's value, I'm a big fan of Jauss's horizon of expectations, that film being a commercial film with a conventional narrative (and even worse, the third film in a series), it wouldn't stretch any informed viewer's horizon and would sit pretty poorly in the artistic discussion. Now, you can dismiss any theoretical approach to art all you want and prefer the it's-all-art understanding of human creation, but that puts your bathroom break at the same level of artistic wonder than the 150 minutes you sat in the theater.
It does not help that in the comic books the regularly change or retcon characters back stories, power or whatever. Some still argue which is the teal one for various characters. Then you have the multiverse and versions of a character having more or less powers or a different story in one series of comics vs another's.Since you obviously don't understand the ART of comic books, what the MCU have been doing is basically cramming up decades of character development and history into a movie series, in some cases a trilogy (Iron Man, Spider-Man, Cap) which is a very tough task and short cuts have to be taken due to available screentime but to me they've done a remarkable job at it so far.
That's your following argument to "each individual should decide what they consider art"? That I don't understand "ART"?Since you obviously don't understand the ART of comic books, what the MCU have been doing is basically cramming up decades of character development and history into a movie series, in some cases a trilogy (Iron Man, Spider-Man, Cap) which is a very tough task and short cuts have to be taken due to available screentime but to me they've done a remarkable job at it so far.
I'm referring to basically anything that was done by the end of 90's-ish.It does not help that in the comic books the regularly change or retcon characters back stories, power or whatever. Some still argue which is the teal one for various characters. Then you have the multiverse and versions of a character having more or less powers or a different story in one series of comics vs another's.
I was just trying to type a really long sentence and that's what I came up with.That's your following argument to "each individual should decide what they consider art"? That I don't understand "ART"?
That's gold. Even coming from you.
As for the MCU's world building as a whole, ok.... that wasn't part of the discussion.
Yes, exactly. Some would call that trolling, but at 87k posts, it has to be something else.I was just trying to type a really long sentence and that's what I came up with.
I call it bragging with my English.Yes, exactly. Some would call that trolling, but at 87k posts, it has to be something else.