Grub's Canucks & NHL News, Rumours, and & Fantasy GM | Training Camp Begins

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

Vector

Moderator
Feb 2, 2007
26,340
43,994
Junktown


Rogers Sale:
-the NHL is going to want to get a big media deal

Canucks Goalies:
-Demko knows not to rush it back
-easier to say he won't rush back now but hard as the season rolls on
-Silovs made it pretty clear in the off-season that he doesn't want to go to the minors
-including playoffs, Silovs has played 19 games so it's another 41 before he needs waivers
 

sting101

Registered User
Feb 8, 2012
16,483
15,625
Given Demko's status, they would be idiots not to rotate through 3 goalies this year. The solution is so clear and obvious. Just make use of Silov's waiver status to send him up and down as the planned rotation of starts dictates in order to manage the cap.

Lankinen is not a starter but he's great in a back up role. Silovs is not a starter but shows signs of being able to play as a backup. Demko is a starter who can't safely handle a starter's game load. Just do the obvious thing and don't overthink things.
Totally agree but if Silovs outplays Lankinen they are gonna have to try and ditch Lankinen sooner than they probably want to.

Should be interesting. Woodley has Lankinen inside his top45 goalies. Silovs is still a ball of potential. Demko healthy is top5. It's a good setup all being healthy and happy.

Issue (and it's actually a good sign) will be if Silovs outplays Lankinen and doesn't feel he should be going to Abbotsford. And i only say issue because we lose the depth in all likelihood if we try and move Lankinen with that contract down. Carrying 3 goalies isn't ideal

Like you said though it should be simple as long as Silovs plays ball without too much ego which shouldn't be a problem. He doesnt take a pay cut this year to play in Abby
 

VanJack

Registered User
Jul 11, 2014
22,194
15,642
At some point, a goalie has to transition from being 'a ball of potential' to the real deal. And for Silovs, that time is now. He's coming off a season where he was basically the Canucks playoff starter; backstopped Latvia to an unlikely bronze medal in the World Hockey Championships; and just completed his second full season in the AHL, where he done everything he can do at that level.

Tocchet has expressed confidence that with the team's personnel and their defensive system, they should be able to thrive with any goalie between the pipes. Brave words, perhaps. But looking around the league, there's a lot of teams win a lot of games with what I would consider pretty 'average' goaltending.

At some point, a goalie has to transition from being 'a ball of potential' to the real deal. And for Silovs, that time is now. He's coming off a season where he was basically the Canucks playoff starter; backstopped Latvia to an unlikely bronze medal in the World Hockey Championships; and just completed his second full season in the AHL, where he done everything he can do at that level.

Tocchet has expressed confidence that with the team's personnel and their defensive system, they should be able to thrive with any goalie between the pipes. Brave words, perhaps. But looking around the league, there's a lot of teams win a lot of games with what I would consider pretty 'average' goaltending.
 

TruGr1t

Proper Villain
Jun 26, 2003
24,431
8,930
Totally agree but if Silovs outplays Lankinen they are gonna have to try and ditch Lankinen sooner than they probably want to.

Should be interesting. Woodley has Lankinen inside his top45 goalies. Silovs is still a ball of potential. Demko healthy is top5. It's a good setup all being healthy and happy.

Issue (and it's actually a good sign) will be if Silovs outplays Lankinen and doesn't feel he should be going to Abbotsford. And i only say issue because we lose the depth in all likelihood if we try and move Lankinen with that contract down. Carrying 3 goalies isn't ideal

Like you said though it should be simple as long as Silovs plays ball without too much ego which shouldn't be a problem. He doesnt take a pay cut this year to play in Abby

The writing is on the wall with the cap and management's desire to try and stay out of LTIR. No way they carry three active goalies, and Silovs is exempt from waivers. He's going down when Demko is healthy unless Lankinen totally craps the bed. I can't really see much rationale to carry Silovs as a back-up if Lankinen plays up to his usual standards, when you can give Silovs a starters workload in Abbie.

If Demko is out longer than expected, they'll obviously just ride some type of pretty even, hot-hand split between Silovs/Lankinen.
 

Vector

Moderator
Feb 2, 2007
26,340
43,994
Junktown
The writing is on the wall with the cap and management's desire to try and stay out of LTIR. No way they carry three active goalies, and Silovs is exempt from waivers. He's going down when Demko is healthy unless Lankinen totally craps the bed. I can't really see much rationale to carry Silovs as a back-up if Lankinen plays up to his usual standards, when you can give Silovs a starters workload in Abbie.

If Demko is out longer than expected, they'll obviously just ride some type of pretty even, hot-hand split between Silovs/Lankinen.

If they can handle it, I imagine they'll want to try and generate enough cap-space to call Silovs up after the deadline and roll with three goalies then.
 

sting101

Registered User
Feb 8, 2012
16,483
15,625
Surprised they haven't bit the bullet and lost Poolman already
probably because that amount of dead money when most teams are looking to be scaling up would come with a 2nd round pick ask

At the deadline it can easily just off set a deal and shouldn't cost anything as long as they meet the asking price for a team just looking for futures from a pending UFA
 

sting101

Registered User
Feb 8, 2012
16,483
15,625
Pod for a 4th
Lankinen for a 3rd

Suter 3rd 4th Poolman for M.Pettersson Gavrikov or Chychrun
 

Jerry the great

Registered User
Jul 8, 2022
833
838
Surprised they haven't bit the bullet and lost Poolman already
If it were me, it would probably be my last move. Get the team how i want it with him there while tracking the cost to unload him. A team that's going to be operating in LTIR anyway might have hole open up due to injury which we have a solution for and can include him in the deal. Or there might be more cap space harvesters than teams looking to create space and the cost to unload him drops as it just did for back up goalies. If you're in a position to begin the season without tapping LTIR and you find a home for him in the 11th hour...that's a huge win on top of an already successful offseason.
 
Last edited:

Nick Lang

Registered User
May 14, 2015
2,294
779

“McDavid was initially diagnosed with a Grade 2 PCL strain because of all the swelling around his knee. A second medical opinion in Colorado revealed the full PCL tear, plus a torn meniscus on both sides of the knee, cracked fibia and a popliteus muscle that was torn right off the bone.”

“While the surgery was booked, McDavid sought a third medical opinion in Los Angeles. That doctor confirmed the nature of the injury, but recommended rehab over surgery — a decision that led to highly respected Dr. Mark Lindsay being brought in to oversee a fluid recovery process, and helped return McDavid back to health in time for the season.“

I find it extremely hard to believe they missed this when doing their research if a simple “NHL popliteus injury” search resulted in this article being one of the first to pop up.

There are also articles using the same wording that McDavid’s popliteus muscle was “detached” and the nature of his injured knee was career threatening. Don’t get me wrong it is still rare, but definitely not true there weren’t any cases when there was one as recent as 4 years ago.

Who is this McDavid guy. Any good?

Lol, hard to believe they missed it but not really. Reporters are just absolute garbage these days. Is googling what you're researching that difficult? :laugh:
 

RobertKron

Registered User
Sep 1, 2007
15,845
9,350
At some point, a goalie has to transition from being 'a ball of potential' to the real deal. And for Silovs, that time is now. He's coming off a season where he was basically the Canucks playoff starter; backstopped Latvia to an unlikely bronze medal in the World Hockey Championships; and just completed his second full season in the AHL, where he done everything he can do at that level.

Tocchet has expressed confidence that with the team's personnel and their defensive system, they should be able to thrive with any goalie between the pipes. Brave words, perhaps. But looking around the league, there's a lot of teams win a lot of games with what I would consider pretty 'average' goaltending.

At some point, a goalie has to transition from being 'a ball of potential' to the real deal. And for Silovs, that time is now. He's coming off a season where he was basically the Canucks playoff starter; backstopped Latvia to an unlikely bronze medal in the World Hockey Championships; and just completed his second full season in the AHL, where he done everything he can do at that level.

Tocchet has expressed confidence that with the team's personnel and their defensive system, they should be able to thrive with any goalie between the pipes. Brave words, perhaps. But looking around the league, there's a lot of teams win a lot of games with what I would consider pretty 'average' goaltending.

At some point, a goalie has to transition from being 'a ball of potential' to the real deal. And for Silovs, that time is now. He's coming off a season where he was basically the Canucks playoff starter; backstopped Latvia to an unlikely bronze medal in the World Hockey Championships; and just completed his second full season in the AHL, where he done everything he can do at that level.

Tocchet has expressed confidence that with the team's personnel and their defensive system, they should be able to thrive with any goalie between the pipes. Brave words, perhaps. But looking around the league, there's a lot of teams win a lot of games with what I would consider pretty 'average' goaltending.
 

AlainVigneaultsGum

Holidays in two days
Sponsor
Oct 26, 2012
3,689
6,003
Calgary, AB
At some point, a goalie has to transition from being 'a ball of potential' to the real deal. And for Silovs, that time is now. He's coming off a season where he was basically the Canucks playoff starter; backstopped Latvia to an unlikely bronze medal in the World Hockey Championships; and just completed his second full season in the AHL, where he done everything he can do at that level.

Tocchet has expressed confidence that with the team's personnel and their defensive system, they should be able to thrive with any goalie between the pipes. Brave words, perhaps. But looking around the league, there's a lot of teams win a lot of games with what I would consider pretty 'average' goaltending.


At some point, a goalie has to transition from being 'a ball of potential' to the real deal. And for Silovs, that time is now. He's coming off a season where he was basically the Canucks playoff starter; backstopped Latvia to an unlikely bronze medal in the World Hockey Championships; and just completed his second full season in the AHL, where he done everything he can do at that level.

Tocchet has expressed confidence that with the team's personnel and their defensive system, they should be able to thrive with any goalie between the pipes. Brave words, perhaps. But looking around the league, there's a lot of teams win a lot of games with what I would consider pretty 'average' goaltending.
 

Hammman

Registered User
Apr 3, 2010
1,346
1,672
Bringing up McDavid's knee in comparison seems pretty disingenuous to me. Sure, his poplietus was injured, but it was hardly a poplietus injury specifically. If someone was shocked that their airbag had suddenly gone off unexpectedly and you countered that airbags go off all the time in car accidents, you're intentionally misrepresenting the point.
 

MarkusNaslund19

Registered User
Dec 28, 2005
5,691
8,398
Bringing up McDavid's knee in comparison seems pretty disingenuous to me. Sure, his poplietus was injured, but it was hardly a poplietus injury specifically. If someone was shocked that their airbag had suddenly gone off unexpectedly and you countered that airbags go off all the time in car accidents, you're intentionally misrepresenting the point.
1000 percent.

I'm constantly shocked by people on these boards taking something complex, oversimplifying it, and then having a strong opinion on it.

If the Canucks and Demko have said that no other NHLer has had this injury as they try to figure out next steps with a Billion dollar + business on the line, you can probably assume that your 4 minute google solution has been acknowledged and discarded as insufficient.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad