rypper
21-12-05 it's finally over.
- Dec 22, 2006
- 17,511
- 22,700
They tried to re-sign both of them, so I don't think the original intention was for them to solely be rentals.2 rentals last year
They tried to re-sign both of them, so I don't think the original intention was for them to solely be rentals.2 rentals last year
I agree it looks like they did try and resign them. But also they turned out to be rentals.They tried to re-sign both of them, so I don't think the original intention was for them to solely be rentals.
I agree it looks like they did try and resign them. But also they turned out to be rentals.
Do not underestimate the power of Aquillini wanting to get into the playoffs for extra revenue. Never for one second have I believed he cares more about winning than money. That theory has been proven to be true a hundred times over.
Sure....but I don't believe that when they traded for them they considered them as pure rentals...they just happened to price themselves out of where we wanted to spend on them. And I also don't think you'll see them go after any rentals this year, at least not until closer to the deadline when they have a better understanding of the landscape in front of them.2 rentals last year
Yeah I hear you but that it doesn’t change the fact that it’s still true and they gave up 4 picks ++ for those guys.Sure....but I don't believe that when they traded for them they considered them as pure rentals...they just happened to price themselves out of where we wanted to spend on them. And I also don't think you'll see them go after any rentals this year, at least not until closer to the deadline when they have a better understanding of the landscape in front of them.
So who are some realistic, 2nd pairing Dmen that are UFA or on teams who are rebuilding/missing the playoffs?
Not a 1st line Dman who we fantasize about playing on out 2nd pairing = Dobson, Dahlin.
I think:
C Murphy is a great target. Size, decent contract and plays the PK very well. Injuries are a concern tho.
R Pulock = Good salary, decent player.
D Severson = Risky contract. Long and expensive but has shown flashes of promise. We would need to ship salary out - VD+Hog
M Weegar - Prob the most expensive to trade for but a fantastic player. Hog + 1st + Prospect
A Zub = On IR but would slot in perfectly behind Hughes - Hronek. Would be a big cost to get him.
M Matheson - Habs would want young players and prospects.
Id put K Miller, M Pettersson, Gudas on the list.
My list does not mean any of these players are avilable, but what I think would fit well on the 2nd pairing
Yeah I hear you but that it doesn’t change the fact that it’s still true and they gave up 4 picks ++ for those guys.
They gave it the old college try but it didn’t happen so not sure how much that’s worth.
This management team is light years ahead of Benning for sure, but they also gave 6.5 Million to Myers, Forbort and Deharnais with some term.
I would much rather Zadorov than those other 3.
As for Aquilini, sure his name isn’t in the news as much but anyone thinking he isn’t very involved is crazy. I’m sorry there’s no chance he isn’t involved daily.
Do I have proof? No. Does anyone have proof that he isn’t though? Just basing my opinion on history.
Again, JR and Allvin are much better than Benning. But, they really screwed up the D this year. Badly.
Agreed. I was hesitant to add him because he is a 1st pairing dman, but he would be amazing.For me, Weegar would be the absolute perfect fit....but the cost would likely be astronomical, if he's even available at all. Totally underrated defenseman.
I would love to add Weegar but I think he’s probably less likely to move then Rasmus.Agreed. I was hesitant to add him because he is a 1st pairing dman, but he would be amazing.
Hog+1st+Raty+ VD
or
Hog + Lek + VD
A back end of
Hughes - Hronek
Weegar - Will
Soucy - Myers looks a lot better than what we have now
Yes, Weegar is a rare RH’ed shot that actually plays well at LDDon’t think you’re getting Weegar without including Lekk or Willander. Also, if Hronek slots in with Hughes and Willander is soon to be the 2RHD then does a Weegar move make sense?
Weegar plays LD v wellDon’t think you’re getting Weegar without including Lekk or Willander. Also, if Hronek slots in with Hughes and Willander is soon to be the 2RHD then does a Weegar move make sense?
I think they should be trying to line up a stud 2LHD to play with Willander.
Was looking at Buffalo again and thinking why would they deal Byram? He’s playing 24 min a night and looking great.
They aren’t moving Dhalin or Power. Then I was thinking about Matthias Samuelsson. Was signed long term a few years ago. Can’t stay healthy. Huge. Defensive. Perfect buy low candidate and they will need to move someone to open up ice time.
I’m not even sure it would cost a 1st.
2nd and Hoglander. He would look amazing with Willander.
I worry about their current record (which is objectively solid) only because their schedule has been extremely soft to start the year. Hopefully these injuries are front loaded.Basically was saying we have one of the lowest # of regulation losses in the league. Only Vegas has less.
Edit - Sadly, we also lead the league in OTL. Last year we were never out of a game even if down a couple of goals. This year it seems no lead is safe.
They were talent shy and still let two rentals walk, they are pot committed. The Miller timeline looms large here.
I had a post cooked up for this, but held back. Now's not the time. Let's see what they're like when everyone is back and see where they stack up.
Yes it would be nice, , but neither of those deals with the fact you are increasing the cap hit by over $3M, and would have to add another body internally, which would probably add another $1M.Agreed. I was hesitant to add him because he is a 1st pairing dman, but he would be amazing.
Hog+1st+Raty+ VD
or
Hog + Lek + VD
A back end of
Hughes - Hronek
Weegar - Will
Soucy - Myers looks a lot better than what we have now
Vector hasn't mentioned it so I'll post this I guess
Weegar is signed for the next 6 years after this season at a pretty reasonable sum...despite it being highly unlikely, I wouldn't consider it a "short term fix" to add a legit top pairing defenseman for the next 6 years.Yes it would be nice, , but neither of those deals with the fact you are increasing the cap hit by over $3M, and would have to add another body internally, which would probably add another $1M.
On a side note, Hogs and OEL are removing $4.3 M to our cap space next year. The go from a cap hit this year of roughly $3.5 M up to $7.8 M next year.
So please, let's not give up our assets that are going to allow us to comply with the cap. Namely draft picks and prospects that will be on ELC for years. So we trade Miller, Garland, Boeser, Hronek or Demko.
And we do not look like a contender this year ... yet. So lets no go back to the Dim Jim day where we trade our draft picks and prospects for short term fixes that don't work.
Because I had minor surgery this morning and am working on a recap right now. Impatience leads to Taj.
I told you before, flared base onlyBecause I had minor surgery this morning and am working on a recap right now. Impatience leads to Taj.
my mind immediately goes to "the fusilli Jerry"I told you before, flared base only