Matt Rentfree
Registered User
This should be the lineup
Yeah, so this was smart.
Panarin-Trochek-Laf
Cuylle-Cheadle-Kakko
Kreider-DJ-Smith
Edstrom-Carrick-Vesey
Miller-Fox
Schneider-Trouba
Jones-Mancini
This should be the lineup
Yeah, so this was smart.
It is conjecture but imagining a pro athlete who's achieved the level of play he has suddenly developing an attitude not wanting to try hard is also conjecture and a wild one at that.
That pretty much was the lineup when we got off to a great start.This should be the lineup
Panarin-Trochek-Laf
Cuylle-Cheadle-Kakko
Kreider-DJ-Smith
Edstrom-Carrick-Vesey
Miller-Fox
Schneider-Trouba
Jones-Mancini
Granted, we played some pretty bad teams to start the season which may have contributed to the goal share numbers. On the other hand - we got humiliated by the Sabres with the new lines and pairings.That pretty much was the lineup when we got off to a great start.
Lavi is doing the opposite of everything like George Costanza. The default forward lines > current lines. The new d pairs > default pairs. Difference is, it worked for Costanza. Lavi is just f***ing it up.
Yeah, so this was smart.
Simple geometry.Lavi is doing the opposite of everything like George Costanza. The default forward lines > better than current lines. The new d pairs > default pairs. Difference is, it worked for Costanza. Lavi is just f***ing it up.
Arrest this man.
We were good until the Washington game.Granted, we played some pretty bad teams to start the season which may have contributed to the goal share numbers. On the other hand - we got humiliated by the Sabres with the new lines and pairings.
My memory sucks - was that the first game Lindgren played next to Fox and Miller went back with Trouba?Simple geometry.
We were good until the Washington game.
Except he's had multiple conclusions LOL.Maybe he's lost confidence, or some physical abilities, or motivation after getting paid. Making up concussion theories is wilder than any of these things.
It was the game after, I think, part of the way through.My memory sucks - was that the first game Lindgren played next to Fox and Miller went back with Trouba?
I'm taking this as me never reading another Brooks' column going forward.Per Mollie, Brooks' columns will be behind the NYP paywall going forward. Take it for what you wish.
Things are getting contentious, time to capitalize on it. Bye Larry.Per Mollie, Brooks' columns will be behind the NYP paywall going forward. Take it for what you wish.
MSG E has a stake in how the Rangers look, too.His blockheadedness is so mind boggling it’s making me think someone else is pulling the strings . A certain becigared individual lurking the shadows perhaps?
Just throwing this out there, maybe the players feel betrayed with the handling of Goodrow and Trouba during the offseason by Drury.
As fans we see bade contracts aging like milk left in the sun but to the team these are their brothers in arms and even more that both players considered leaders.
Now this year we see Mika as spent. He has no game. As Brian Boyle pointed out if Mika isn’t going to score then he needs to to something (else) and he has not or can no longer play at an NHL level.
The players might see Mika as a teammate going through a bad stretch and their coach is overreacting.
The only one who's irredeemable out of those is Lindgren. He should be nowhere near Fox and nowhere near NHL ice, quite frankly.Wait so Trouba, Miller and Lindgren among others admittely individually suck but if they were just played in different combos amongst each other, the team would somehow be A okay and just be on a roll.
doesn't make sense.
Those stats about the pairings are a symptom not the cause.
The NHL is obviously hard as heck to be consistently good, and there's obviously serious doubts about the true contention of this team, they go into some deep valleys in regards to their quality of play. Too many individuals not carrying their water.
Sucks because Mollie still can't write grammatically correct sentences!Per Mollie, Brooks' columns will be behind the NYP paywall going forward. Take it for what you wish.
Hopefully, Mollie goes with him.Per Mollie, Brooks' columns will be behind the NYP paywall going forward. Take it for what you wish.
How will I ever survive?Per Mollie, Brooks' columns will be behind the NYP paywall going forward. Take it for what you wish.
You used the operative word: "Individuals" -- Rangers aren't a team...they are a bunch of individuals thrown together.Wait so Trouba, Miller and Lindgren among others admittely individually suck but if they were just played in different combos amongst each other, the team would somehow be A okay and just be on a roll.
doesn't make sense.
Those stats about the pairings are a symptom not the cause.
The NHL is obviously hard as heck to be consistently good, and there's obviously serious doubts about the true contention of this team, they go into some deep valleys in regards to their quality of play. Too many individuals not carrying their water.
Your avatar kills me.Wait so Trouba, Miller and Lindgren among others admittely individually suck but if they were just played in different combos amongst each other, the team would somehow be A okay and just be on a roll.
doesn't make sense.
Those stats about the pairings are a symptom not the cause.
The NHL is obviously hard as heck to be consistently good, and there's obviously serious doubts about the true contention of this team, they go into some deep valleys in regards to their quality of play. Too many individuals not carrying their water.
who needing grammar?Sucks because Mollie still can't write grammatically correct sentences!
Yeah, so this was smart.
Reality is not a simulation. It's meaningless.Skewed because Rangers were pressing down late at the end of the game.
If I was president for a day I would have people tar and feathered for posting the piece o' shit o'meter