Ail
Based and Rangerspilled.
Remember 12-13 when people threw Kreider in the top 6? Lol
Remember 13-14 when he is in the top-6 and producing?
Remember 12-13 when people threw Kreider in the top 6? Lol
We produced twice as many NHLers as the average team since Gordie took over our drafts. Drafting has nit been a problem.
We didn't finish our rebuilding. We had one late season rebuild effort. We should've dealt away Nylander, Straka, Jagr, etc the post-lockout season. Those assets may have given us the Cup instead of Eastern Conference Finals two years ago.
But fans, including those on this forum, would rather make the playoffs immediately than go for the Cup in 2-3 years. I had this argument here and most of the forum was in agreement that it is important to make the playoffs because it gives you the best chance to win since playoffs=chance.
The inability to sacrifice a little at present for a lot in the future is what has caused us to have one Cup in 74 years.
But fans, including those on this forum, would rather make the playoffs immediately than go for the Cup in 2-3 years. I had this argument here and most of the forum was in agreement that it is important to make the playoffs because it gives you the best chance to win since playoffs=chance.
The inability to sacrifice a little at present for a lot in the future is what has caused us to have one Cup in 74 years.
"Miller will be an NHL regular and help us win the Stanley Cup"
...end of story
How about drafting better players with our picks?
Walked into that one.
When he was drafted, we heard what a hard working guy he is. He wanted to get to the NHL as soon as possible. I don't see it.
Show us this history of Gordie Clark clinically ****ing up our draft picks when loads of better players were available. The only 1st round pick so far he's truly missed on was Bobby Sanguinetti.
Come on, man. He's 20 years old. He should be a junior in college right now. You should know better than this.
There are teams that lose every year and never get a cup. There is no guarantee that if you lose 1,2, or 3 years you get a cup. There are teams that have cups that never had a #1 overall pick. How many high picks have teams like the Oilers and Columbus had? I think even Nash was a #1 pick.
Ah, yes. The "Why did we pass on this guy who was taken 30 picks later?" reasoning.
The Penguins needed what, 4 #1 picks, and generational talent to win one Cup. Trading away every player worth beans for prospects and picks and picking near the top seems to be the least effective way to build a perennial powerhouse. Chicago had two shots to draft in the top 3 and they wound up with Toews and Kane. Look how many top picks Columbus, NYI, Tampa Bay, Florida, Ottawa, Edmonton, Pittsburgh have had. Between them they have one Cup and it's the team that wound up with a generational talent, possibly two.
I'd rather follow the NJD, Detroit, Boston, Anaheim method of building a solid core through shrewd UFA management, trades, and drafting, and having a roster and coaching philosophy
that reflect an overall united concept of winning hockey.
Losing = winning is only what sack of **** team's fans tell themselves of message boards as they watch mismanagement wreck their rosters on the road to the lottery every year.
Bostons cup came from guys like Chara, Tim Thomas, and Marchand not from tanking for a #1 pick. You named 2 teams that won and ignore all the losing teams that have never won. By the way we were a losing team the year Pitt won the Crosby lottery. The year before the Caps drafted AO #1 overall. Where are all their cups? I have no respect for the idea that we should try to purposefully try to lose games.
What does age have to do with effort?
My point is I don't have a clear picture of what the organization sees him being. And watching him play, I don't have a clear picture myself.
In what way is he not displaying effort? He's been the best player in Hartford every time he's sent back down there. Do you see him being lazy on the ice or something? I don't understand what it is that you're disappointed with in regards to effort. I don't know what he's going to be and I don't think the organization does either. Again, he is 20 years old. Why does he need a defined role or projection right now? Do you have the same demands of Boo Nieves?
Bostons cup came from guys like Chara, Tim Thomas, and Marchand not from tanking for a #1 pick. You named 2 teams that won and ignore all the losing teams that have never won. By the way we were a losing team the year Pitt won the Crosby lottery. The year before the Caps drafted AO #1 overall. Where are all their cups? I have no respect for the idea that we should try to purposefully try to lose games.
In what way is he not displaying effort? He's been the best player in Hartford every time he's sent back down there. Do you see him being lazy on the ice or something? I don't understand what it is that you're disappointed with in regards to effort. I don't know what he's going to be and I don't think the organization does either. Again, he is 20 years old. Why does he need a defined role or projection right now? Do you have the same demands of Boo Nieves?
He doesn't stand out. On a time that as a whole doesn't play hard, where the bar is very low when it comes to effort, he isn't noticeable. Being the best player in Hartford really doesn't great me all that excited.
With Krieder there was flashes and glimpses of what could be. The speed was obvious. He scored a few goal-scorer goals. I could see tools to work with. I don't see anything in Miller that I can say, "he does that's really well." I have no feel for him as player.