Post-Game Talk: GM30 | Canucks defeat Avalanche | 3-1 | Sherwood(3) | Best Tree in the Forest

calnuck

Registered User
Nov 26, 2010
4,497
4,342
CA
While I love the title, in my mind this was a perfect example of a team win. Everyone sacrificed and worked their bags off. This is when you think there's something significant about this group.
Oh for sure I’m just being cheeky lol
 
  • Love
Reactions: quat

MS

1%er
Mar 18, 2002
56,396
94,214
Vancouver, BC
Weird series of games. Convincing wins over Florida and Colorado, awful loss to Boston sandwiched in the middle. This is also probably why you don't overreact after one bad loss.

Biggest thing was that both Miller and Pettersson were very good tonight. This is the first game since the first half of last season where both were above-average while playing C on different lines, and the team is just totally different when that's the case. If both those guys are going and playing to their potential, we're a Cup contender. If they aren't, we aren't.

Sherwood is ridiculous. Good game for all the foot soldiers - Heinen, Suter, Blueger were all winning battles and gumming up what Colorado was trying to do.

Desharnais had maybe his best game of the season, at a good time where scouts were probably watching him closely.

Hughes wasn't terrible but had an awkward night against Colorado as usual.

Myers and Soucy were both very good. Juulsen continues to play well.

A real shame they didn't get the SO for Demko but this game has to be a huge confidence builder for him.
 

kanucks25

Chris Tanev #1 Fan
Nov 29, 2013
7,480
4,654
Surrey, BC
Lots of strong efforts tonight:

- Demko looked in control and dialed in
- Miller had jump from the opening faceoff, could have had 3 points easily
- Pettersson looked engaged, must have had clear instructions to get shot attempts
- Most of the D-men were pretty solid outside of a tough start for Brannstrom, Myers in particular had a strong game
- Sherwood, obviously

Not perfect, some breakdowns, but pretty strong all around effort against a dangerous team. The heat was on and the squad responded well.
 
Last edited:

vancityluongo

curse of the strombino
Sponsor
Jul 8, 2006
18,974
6,972
Edmonton
1734415979525.png
 

ziploc

Registered User
Aug 29, 2003
7,542
6,639
Vancouver
Tochett sent a message to a team, I doubt he was talking about sherwood, but overall the team played well.
They were way better organised and disciplined and motivated last year. That's my current concern. Obviously a porous D and key injuries haven't helped, but they desperately need to build some good, consistent habits over the rest of the regular season.
 

VanJack

Registered User
Jul 11, 2014
23,017
16,518
So Sherwood now up to 11 goals; while Marchassault has seven; and Stamkos with eight.

For Preds fans, it's OK to cry now.
 

mriswith

Registered User
Oct 12, 2011
4,560
8,311
While I love the title, in my mind this was a perfect example of a team win. Everyone sacrificed and worked their bags off. This is when you think there's something significant about this group.
The team is good and doesn't need a shake up.

Find a 2LD who can move the puck and carry their pairing and we're back to the team we were in the last quarter of the regular season last year. The problem is entirely the second pairing and that should be fixable without nuking the roster.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coffee

Johnny Canucker

Registered User
Jan 4, 2009
18,229
6,539
The team is good and doesn't need a shake up.

Find a 2LD who can move the puck and carry their pairing and we're back to the team we were in the last quarter of the regular season last year. The problem is entirely the second pairing and that should be fixable without nuking the roster.

The team can be good. It can also be horrid. The key is finding consistency. We have beat the Panthers and Avalanche in a week. We also have lost to Boston etc.
 

Wisp

Registered User
Nov 14, 2010
7,749
2,466
well kind of fitting to quiet the drama - everyone played their assess off for a desevered win but no one but kiefer sherwood got goals and only the role players got points.
 

Johnny Canucker

Registered User
Jan 4, 2009
18,229
6,539
Someone needs to flat out ask Tocch if either 9 or 40 asked to not be on the PP together. He will deny it but maybe we can get a read. Cuz this was odd.
 

MS

1%er
Mar 18, 2002
56,396
94,214
Vancouver, BC
What happened to the rule that it’s not icing if the puck touches the crease? Did they abandon that in the ‘90s?

I have no idea. It feels like it was a thing more recently than that. I still expect it to be waived off every time and then I'm like 'oh yeah' when it's not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jyrki21

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad