Post-Game Talk: GM11 | Canucks defeat Ducks | 5-1 (Boeser, Sherwood, Pettersson, DeBrusk, & Heinen) | QUINN HUGHES IS ONE OF THE GREATEST OF ALL TIME

ManVanFan

Registered User
Mar 28, 2024
708
693
Right now the Ducks are using McTavish, Zegras and Carlson down the middle. and all of them are 23 and under. I realize there's such a thing as 'learning on the job' but seems to me all the Ducks will do is ruin their development.

And looking around the Honda Centre.......the barn looked half empty. Maybe the election had something to do with it, but this franchise isn't in a very good place right now.
They could have been rolling
Lindholm Theodore
M. Pettersson Montour

To draft those 4 in a 3 year period and not have a single one on their roster.
 

Mr. Canucklehead

Kitimat Canuck
Dec 14, 2002
42,443
37,724
Kitimat, BC
Only got to see bits of the first and third between hockey practices but man, felt like our most complete effort of the year.

Quinn Hughes is just amazing. This team is so damn fortunate to have him.

Kevin Lankinen just keeps on delivering the goods. Still can’t believe he was sitting there unsigned before camp.

And speaking of bargains, Kiefer Sherwood continues to look awesome.

Great to see DeBrusk and Petey hit the scoresheet too. Hopefully both are heating up.
 

pitseleh

Registered User
Jul 30, 2005
19,366
3,328
Vancouver
That Blueger-Sherwood-Heinen line is looking great.

Play with drive and pace, support each other well on the rush.
Small sample at this point but they’re running a 57% CF/xGF rate together. Even if they fall back down to earth a bit, that’s a great third line cobbled together with $5 million/year in UFA contracts.
 

Vector

Moderator
Feb 2, 2007
27,467
46,587
Junktown
Small sample at this point but they’re running a 57% CF/xGF rate together. Even if they fall back down to earth a bit, that’s a great third line cobbled together with $5 million/year in UFA contracts.

Is there a “chirps per second” metric? I feel like Sherwood would be leading the league in that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pitseleh

strattonius

Registered User
Jul 4, 2011
4,636
5,330
Surrey, BC
Small sample at this point but they’re running a 57% CF/xGF rate together. Even if they fall back down to earth a bit, that’s a great third line cobbled together with $5 million/year in UFA contracts.

Still have Joshua coming back soon.

Forward group is extremely versatile and skilled this year.
 

dKs89

Registered User
Oct 22, 2016
309
451
It's wild essentially having four lines that can score. I read a lot of projections going into the season about people thinking the Canucks have one of the deepest forward groups in the league and so far it is true. That is with a struggling Petey and a seemingly hampered Miller. No Joshua either. It seems like one of Blueger, Suter, Sherwood and Heinen take turns each game having a major impact on the scoresheet. Oh and Garland has taken another step. He is straight up playing like a first line winger so far this season. He is all over the ice and is getting some PK time now too. That's not mentioning players like Hoglander and Sprong who are both skilled and can score along with Hog being a puck battling winning machine on the forecheck.

Not even at their peak potential in the slightest and still one of the deepest forward groups this franchise has ever had.
 

Josepho

i want the bartkowski thread back
Jan 1, 2015
15,041
8,765
British Columbia
Through 6 games the Desharnais and Brannstrom pair has an XGF% of around 70. I know he's been a bit of a whipping boy and the contract value is meh but Desharnais/Brannstrom has worked far better than any other bottom pair and I think Desharnais is pretty clearly one of the top 6 defenceman on the team.
 

Jyrki

Benning has been purged! VANmen!
May 24, 2011
13,608
2,898
溫哥華
Through 6 games the Desharnais and Brannstrom pair has an XGF% of around 70. I know he's been a bit of a whipping boy and the contract value is meh but Desharnais/Brannstrom has worked far better than any other bottom pair and I think Desharnais is pretty clearly one of the top 6 defenceman on the team.
Credit to Cook Allvin for finding some spice after the Desharnais/Forbort signings were looking to be mistakes. But we do have the problem where, if injuries stack up, we'll have half our blueline be very slow defensemen who can't move the puck fast. Given how well Brannstrom has fit, maybe Allvin overreacted to losing Z...
 

Breakers

Make Mirrored Visors Legal Again
Aug 5, 2014
22,730
21,349
Denver Colorado
Zegras looks even more cooked than Pettersson right now

they'll be lucky to get a 3rd round pick for Ze when they inevitably trade him
 

strattonius

Registered User
Jul 4, 2011
4,636
5,330
Surrey, BC
Through 6 games the Desharnais and Brannstrom pair has an XGF% of around 70. I know he's been a bit of a whipping boy and the contract value is meh but Desharnais/Brannstrom has worked far better than any other bottom pair and I think Desharnais is pretty clearly one of the top 6 defenceman on the team.

I don't think he's been unfairly criticized. I just think most people have seen him struggle to adapt to a completely new system. That is slowly changing, though. And a puck mover is definitely helping as his partner.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr. Canucklehead

thecupismine

Registered User
Apr 1, 2007
2,600
1,822
Small sample at this point but they’re running a 57% CF/xGF rate together. Even if they fall back down to earth a bit, that’s a great third line cobbled together with $5 million/year in UFA contracts.

It still blows my mind no one was willing to give Sherwood more money. His metrics last year were great, and he’s a physical pest. I get the lack of track record, but Sam Lafferty (0 points so far in 12 games) got 2 million for being clearly worse…but 2 inches taller?

There were also reports of the Canucks looking for a third line center alongside a defensemen, but I can’t believe that’s true with the way Blueger has been playing. Fourth line so Suter can play wing? Maybe, but hardly a priority pre-deadline with the current depth.

Heinen reminds me of a more skilled Nils Aman, in the way that it seems like he’s doing nothing, but he never costs you either. For a streaky scorer, that’s a good trait to have.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pitseleh

Josepho

i want the bartkowski thread back
Jan 1, 2015
15,041
8,765
British Columbia
It still blows my mind no one was willing to give Sherwood more money. His metrics last year were great, and he’s a physical pest. I get the lack of track record, but Sam Lafferty (0 points so far in 12 games) got 2 million for being clearly worse…but 2 inches taller?

There were also reports of the Canucks looking for a third line center alongside a defensemen, but I can’t believe that’s true with the way Blueger has been playing. Fourth line so Suter can play wing? Maybe, but hardly a priority pre-deadline with the current depth.

Heinen reminds me of a more skilled Nils Aman, in the way that it seems like he’s doing nothing, but he never costs you either. For a streaky scorer, that’s a good trait to have.

Pedigree is really important. Sherwood didn't play in a big-name market, wasn't a high draft pick, was a late bloomer, and didn't have a cup ring or anything like that.

Lomberg, Stenlund, and Lafferty each signed a 2x2 and all of them combined have fewer points than Sherwood. I think in the case of Lafferty it was just Buffalo being obsessed with bringing in speed (McLeod, Malenstyn, Aube-Kubel) this offseason.
 
  • Like
Reactions: thecupismine

Blue and Green

Out to lunch
Dec 17, 2017
3,850
4,014
6-2-3 without Demko, with Pettersson far below his standard and with Miller somewhat limited. The chips have fallen about as good as we could've hoped for so far, given the circumstances. The last 40 minutes last night were very solid.
 

pitseleh

Registered User
Jul 30, 2005
19,366
3,328
Vancouver
It still blows my mind no one was willing to give Sherwood more money. His metrics last year were great, and he’s a physical pest. I get the lack of track record, but Sam Lafferty (0 points so far in 12 games) got 2 million for being clearly worse…but 2 inches taller?
Yakov Trenin is another one. He got more than twice as much AAV for twice as long. He’s a useful player and can play centre in a pinch I guess, but he’s never had a season as good as Sherwood’s last year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: thecupismine

MS

1%er
Mar 18, 2002
55,789
91,895
Vancouver, BC
Strong performance. First 10 minutes were a little wobbly but we absolutely destroyed a crappy Anaheim team for the last 50 minutes.

The whole Pettersson/Hughes goal thing was super weird. Pettersson didn't appear to touch it, didn't celebrate, didn't lead the handshake line. Like, is he so broken he doesn't even try to claim what would be a big goal for him now? Or did the team just manage to successfully argue for him to get a charity goal to boost his confidence? So strange.

Hughes was just unbelievable last night. One of the most dominant games of his career, was just everywhere and looked like he was playing an AHL team.

That said, am I the only one that thinks '3rd fastest D to 300 assists' is kind of a weird/meaningless thing and who didn't get the big fuss made about it?

Sherwood-Blueger-Heinen are basically performing like an elite 2nd line. Heinen is such a weird player - absolutely nothing pops in terms of the eye test but he's just always in the right places at both ends of the rink and has plus hands when scoring opportunities arise around the net.

Thought Pettersson was poor again aside from doing a couple decent things on the PP. Saw 3 separate occasions where he was favoured to win a puck race and then just stopped skating and conceded the play.

Miller's line was solid, if not spectacular. Miller against Anaheim's kids in the faceoff circle was just unfair.

Hoglander showed some more jump and pushback in this game after a series of pretty insipid performances. More of that, please.

Desharnais had a better game, don't remember a case of the play getting behind him which has been his big problem. Another strong game for Brannstrom.

Soucy was horrible in the 1st but I thought the last 40 minutes was maybe the best he's looked this season aside from one dumb penalty.

Lankinen rock solid again. Best value contract in the NHL right now.
 

Bertuzzzi44

Registered User
Jun 26, 2018
4,165
3,975
Through 6 games the Desharnais and Brannstrom pair has an XGF% of around 70. I know he's been a bit of a whipping boy and the contract value is meh but Desharnais/Brannstrom has worked far better than any other bottom pair and I think Desharnais is pretty clearly one of the top 6 defenceman on the team.
Desharnais has been solid of late, both Forbort & Desharnais have gotten better as the season has progressed, could have to do with getting accustomed to coaching/systems but adding mobile puck moving Brannstrom to the bottom pairing rotation (over Juulsen) was a big boost. Glad to see we’re one of the top defensive teams in the NHL.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad