GDT: GM#11 LA Kings vs New York Rangers @12:30pm 10/28/18- Half Assed GDT Version!

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
I’ve said this before but bears repeating. This broadcast sucks, really fell off a cliff when Bob left, wonder if anyone else retired with Bob.

This mic’d up with Iafallo is a disaster, Fox isn’t even watching the game “that came out of nowhere” sorry but that was tape to tape passing and a hard shot to tie the game. Faust is a joke. The whole production is gimmicky.

It was getting bad when Bob was clearly old. Fox has been on a downswing since 14-15. Faust would be ok if he didn't force things, especially with Fox.

Most mic'd up things aren't worth it. Not the stuff they'll put on TV anyway. Iafallo isn't the one to use, sort of want the dirty guys like Phaneuf, but you'll always get the yeah's, or whatever they say to let a guy know he's there for a pass. Usually pointless though, regardless of which broadcast is doing it.
 
step by step. tonight it was better. and these 2 points are huge. but d zone still suxxx. and find a place for kovalchuk. but for tonight, there is only one stamp on the postcard: mom, brown is back!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kingspiracy
Its secondary, existant or not, if you want to say he is bad because he isnt offensive ok I guess...

I'm saying hes bad cause he sucks, but since I'm not going to spend the time spelling it out for you when many others have already you'll just retort saying I cant pinpoint any reasons blah blah blah
 
  • Like
Reactions: KINGS17
I thought Faust was going to do Jeopardy
If he has any sense he will take over for Trebek. Look at the pros:

1. Makes big bank
2. Doesn't have to watch the Luc and Rob Show
3. Is forever immortalized in skits on Saturday Night Live (drawback is that must wait until SNL is over their TDS)
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigKing
Some of us were saying two years ago that Carter should be traded and got chastised for it.

Your're supposed to trade players before they fall off the cliff, not after.

People can't separate their emotions from the decision making process. Fall for it every time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KINGS17
Some of us were saying two years ago that Carter should be traded and got chastised for it.

Your're supposed to trade players before they fall off the cliff, not after.

People can't separate their emotions from the decision making process. Fall for it every time.


Think they'd learn after Richards.
 
Some of us were saying two years ago that Carter should be traded and got chastised for it.

Your're supposed to trade players before they fall off the cliff, not after.

People can't separate their emotions from the decision making process. Fall for it every time.

It can't possibly be due to a disagreement on the timing, right?
 
It can't possibly be due to a disagreement on the timing, right?
I respect you disagreed on the timing, but I think it has been shown people wanting Carter moved have been proven correct. The Kings were going nowhere the last few seasons. There was a large probability that waiting would only reduce Carter's value in a trade, which is exactly where the Kings find themselves.
 
I respect you disagreed on the timing, but I think it has been shown people wanting Carter moved have been proven correct. The Kings were going nowhere the last few seasons. There was a large probability that waiting would only reduce Carter's value in a trade, which is exactly where the Kings find themselves.

I understand it appears that way. I just resent the implication that people didn't want Carter traded due to emotional attachment.
 
I understand it appears that way. I just resent the implication that people didn't want Carter traded due to emotional attachment.
I think people were still hoping the Kings had a chance to contend. That was the problem. When a team isn't a contender and has a valuable asset like Carter two years ago, it's time to maximize his value to the franchise. It doesn't matter if his replacement would not have been a legit 2C, because one of the reason you move him is to be less competitive and get a higher pick in the first round.
 
I respect you disagreed on the timing, but I think it has been shown people wanting Carter moved have been proven correct. The Kings were going nowhere the last few seasons. There was a large probability that waiting would only reduce Carter's value in a trade, which is exactly where the Kings find themselves.

To be completely fair here, a huge part of Carter's demise can be attributed to the injury he suffered last year, which no one could have foreseen. It had nothing to do with age and conditioning or ability, it was just a weird occurrence. I guess proven correct is fair also, but it wasn't because of the reasoning that was being thrown around - it was because of a completely unrelated injury.
 
Some of us were saying two years ago that Carter should be traded and got chastised for it.

Your're supposed to trade players before they fall off the cliff, not after.

People can't separate their emotions from the decision making process. Fall for it every time.

And you want to do it a year too early, rather than a year too late. If 2 years ago was the right time, you really want to do it 3 years ago. Both instances involved Lombardi though, and his emotional attachment to these players.

Lombardi bought into the miracle run in 2014, bringing almost everyone back, when he should've let everyone that he could go, because it was a miracle run that could've gone off the rails at any point of it. He bought into the 8 game winning streak before the 2015 deadline, because he bought into the 2014 miracle run, which ended up costing them the 2016 pick. Then he doubled down on the 2014 miracle run/8 game winning streak, and cost them the 2015 pick.
 
I think people were still hoping the Kings had a chance to contend. That was the problem. When a team isn't a contender and has a valuable asset like Carter two years ago, it's time to maximize his value to the franchise. It doesn't matter if his replacement would not have been a legit 2C, because one of the reason you move him is to be less competitive and get a higher pick in the first round.

I just think it's poor optics when a team with a core of Kopitar, Doughty, and Quick trade quality players to get worse, especially without a quality replacement.

It's why I said a while back the infrastructure needs to be fixed. Getting younger means **** if the talent we bring in gets mismanaged.

We're heading towards Oilers territory the way things are, in my opinion. I want the Kings to set their infrastructure and development so it's closer to the Bruins, Blackhawks, or Penguins
 
  • Like
Reactions: funky

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad