Hah! This is very funny to frame this as derogatory.Top 10 overall this year
You don't want him, that's cool, but the reasoning (wins? only top 10?) is extremely weird.
Hah! This is very funny to frame this as derogatory.Top 10 overall this year
It's a joke because he's only won nine games this year. So yes, ONLY top 10?Hah! This is very funny to frame this as derogatory.
You don't want him, that's cool, but the reasoning (wins? only top 10?) is extremely weird.
I don't think you understand how impressive this is. To be top 10 in that goaltending statistic with so few wins implies how bad the team has been around him and he has excelled despite that.It's a joke because he's only won nine games this year. So yes, ONLY top 10?![]()
I don't think you understand how impressive this is. To be top 10 in a goaltending metric with so few wins implies how bad the team has been around him and he has excelled despite that.
To use it as some sort of demerit fundamentally misunderstands the relationship between the two metrics. I'm sure you're joking though. Or just asking questions.
Since we are looking at team stats23 GP and has only won 9. Yeahhh, I'd keep Skinner. If you're spending the kind of assets that Anaheim would want for him, I'd get another legit top Dman or a finisher that can help McDavid over a netminder.
Yeah see we just will have to agree to disagree. Gibson had one terrible season (last year) and otherwise has pretty much always been the same goalie, with his numbers being aligned with what's in front him. Putting up a .900 SV% in 50+ games behind the worst team of the modern era, was an accomplishment. There are goalies who struggle to put up those numbers on good teams. No one around the game has ever been as down on him as people who just glance at stats and don't apply context. NHL execs still voted him a top 15 goalie just a year ago. You saying he's had poor value for years is just an opinion and I don't believe it's actually shared around the league.