I agree with you, and have been hesitant about Georgiev being worth it. But his recent play in a starters role has been decent, and moreover I just don't know who would even be available as a legit starter with term. All of them are basically on teams looking at the playoffs who I doubt would be willing to downgrade or make a lateral move. Even Georgiev and the Rangers fall in there.No. *I* don’t want anything. Georgiev is about as dime a dozen as goalies come.
I don’t know why Edmonton would have any interest in acquiring him. .905-.910 is not that good. If I’m Edmonton, I actually pay something to acquire an upgrade, not go bargain hunting for someone who, at best, might match the goalie I have already if he stayed healthy.
I would do that in a second if I was Edmonton.Geo + Hajek + NYR 2022 4th [Oil have no 4th atm]
for
Lavoie + Kosk + EDM 2023 3rd
all salaries full pop which gives EDM a bit of instant cap relief [4+ - hair over 3].
Value: Lavoie recently drafted 2nd rnd = sufficient value for Geo.
upgrade of pick reflects both pick now for later pick + NY taking Kosk back
NY should get 4th or 5th for expiring Hajek, but I am more concerned about
a) creating instant roster spot
b) giving the guy a good home as NYR has way too many LD ahead of him
c) recover cap hit now
For those who foolishly insist on win now, and think Geo should be kept this season:
1. It is INDISPUTABLE that Rangers do not have cap for Strome or Geo going forward.
2 More immediately pertinent, we have discerned Geo's track record is starter quality IF IF IF he gets regular starter mins.
NY should NOT give Geo starter mins over Shesty
Shesty should get starter mins vs toughest competition and let Kinkaid/Huska handle balance.
Kosk should be waived to the A.
If someone wants to take him now, great.
If not, see if Benny Allaire can up his game as an insurance policy.
Didn’t they already try one of our backups and it didn’t work for them...why would they want to repeat that cycle?
Wow shows how much I paid attention after that. Although I do not think Georgie is better now then Talbot was then.Talbot was great here for 1.5 years. We got 1 game away from the Western final with him. I'd love to repeat that cycle.
There are no top prospects here. A couple of reclamation projects, a couple of picks, and a couple of goalies. The Rangers get the better pick, the Oilers get the better goalie, not sure about the prospect but I'm not super excited about Hajek after the scouting reports. He's possibly a bust at this point. Lavoie isn't a bust but also isn't a guarantee to make it, and he's been inconsistent in the AHL.
He commands a current 2nd not more unlessI agree Geo needs starter work but I dont see why Drury would just ship him off for basically nothing. Rangers want to win and they are going to play whoever is performing better. If Shesty goes down Geo is the better option over Kincaid and an unproven and not ready Huska. Geo could also then be traded at the draft for more then what this package is to a team who has cap space. I just dont see why they would trade him for this type of return.
agree except that quality guys will cost "a little more".I think that Lavoie is a fair price. he is a 6'3 center with speed and hands who just needs some development time. That is the typical 2nd round pick player that is 3 years into his career. There is a few goalies that we can get in the same rough price range like MAF, Korposalo, Holtby, Quick, Varlamov or Driedger. Some of those guys will be a little more cost to acquire but have some term which is worth paying for. Geo does not have as good a resume as any of those guys, so the oilers are not going to pay more for a bigger question mark if they do make a run.
Hajek needs to be in for reasons explained, cap + also NY needs a roster slot.How about Georgiev + Kravstov instead of Hajek?
Obviously package would have to change from Oilers.
Krav addition would cost BrobergYeah this won't end well . NYR are going to want Broberg .
No. *I* don’t want anything. Georgiev is about as dime a dozen as goalies come.
I don’t know why Edmonton would have any interest in acquiring him. .905-.910 is not that good. If I’m Edmonton, I actually pay something to acquire an upgrade, not go bargain hunting for someone who, at best, might match the goalie I have already if he stayed healthy.
Didn’t they already try one of our backups and it didn’t work for them...why would they want to repeat that cycle?
Well I'd probably pull the trigger on your original proposal then. Not bad, bern.Hajek needs to be in for reasons explained, cap + also NY needs a roster slot.
Krav is not to be had cheap and would cost ....
Krav addition would cost Broberg
It's one thing when a more complicated deal [e.g., retained Price for Krav + with Price then retained further + flipped to Oil for big package, then Broberg is essential just to cover the Krav portion to MON] is involved,
Not nec for this smaller deal where aim is to move Geo for NY for futures and Oil want to upgrade immediate netminding
Wow shows how much I paid attention after that. Although I do not think Georgie is better now then Talbot was then.
I think that Lavoie is a fair price. he is a 6'3 center with speed and hands who just needs some development time. That is the typical 2nd round pick player that is 3 years into his career. There is a few goalies that we can get in the same rough price range like MAF, Korposalo, Holtby, Quick, Varlamov or Driedger. Some of those guys will be a little more cost to acquire but have some term which is worth paying for. Geo does not have as good a resume as any of those guys, so the oilers are not going to pay more for a bigger question mark if they do make a run.
a struggling AHL player who was 2nd rounder few years ago and never played in NHL is not enough for a proven legit NHL goalie.
Koskinen is a proven, legit NHL goalie. See what I did there?
Lavoie is a work in progress. I think he has the size and skill to make the NHL. He has to improve a number of areas of his game, and to me the #1 part of that is consistency.
Heck he is only 21 years old.
while if we expand our view generally speaking there is often enuf blame to go around, here I blame NYR braintrust for wanting its cake and eat it too.Well I'd probably pull the trigger on your original proposal then. Not bad, bern.
Still wish we had tried to pull the trigger on a deal for Buch. What a missed opportunity.
stop w/win now bsa struggling AHL player who was 2nd rounder few years ago and never played in NHL is not enough for a proven legit NHL goalie.
I think that Lavoie is a fair price. he is a 6'3 center with speed and hands who just needs some development time. That is the typical 2nd round pick player that is 3 years into his career. There is a few goalies that we can get in the same rough price range like MAF, Korposalo, Holtby, Quick, Varlamov or Driedger. Some of those guys will be a little more cost to acquire but have some term which is worth paying for. Geo does not have as good a resume as any of those guys, so the oilers are not going to pay more for a bigger question mark if they do make a run.
He commands a current 2nd not more unless
pick is not current but later
he is retained
we are taking back cap dump
a la carte pricing which the package complies with....
You make a good pt about Geo as insurance, but the risk of maybe Shesty goes down is not dominant over certainty of getting a useful asset which we can apply or flip to upgrade a draft pick.
We have not yet fully recovered from all those bad desperation deals, along with draft selections that underwhelmed. Upgrading on both Strome + Geo, both of whom we can't afford to keep anyway as established math, is the correct move to up our chances for multiple seasons going forward.
yes he is a work in progress and Koskinen is a cap dump together they are not worh Georgiev.
2018-19 | Edmonton Oilers | NHL | 55 | 2.93 | 0.906 | | | |||||
2019-20 | Edmonton Oilers | NHL | 38 | 2.75 | 0.917 | | | PLAYOFFS | 4 | 3.16 | 0.889 | |
2020-21 | Edmonton Oilers | NHL | 26 | 3.17 | 0.899 | | | |||||
2021-22 | Edmonton Oilers | NHL | 20 | 3.19 | 0.900 |
2019-20 | New York Rangers | NHL | 34 | 3.04 | 0.910 | | | |||||
2020-21 | New York Rangers | NHL | 19 | 2.71 | 0.905 | | | |||||
2021-22 | New York Rangers | NHL | 17 | 2.71 | 0.908 |
While I'm still skeptical about Georgiev Im starting to think there's good odds that someone who is even just the same would have an impact on the Oilers. They've never played well in front of Koski consistently. You can tell there's no faith there. For that reason I've warmed to a lateral move.Compare Koskinen's numbers vs. Georgeiv:
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
2018-19 Edmonton Oilers NHL 55 2.93 0.906 | 2019-20 Edmonton Oilers NHL 38 2.75 0.917 | PLAYOFFS 4 3.16 0.889 2020-21 Edmonton Oilers NHL 26 3.17 0.899 | 2021-22 Edmonton Oilers NHL 20 3.19 0.900
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
2019-20 New York Rangers NHL 34 3.04 0.910 | 2020-21 New York Rangers NHL 19 2.71 0.905 | 2021-22 New York Rangers NHL 17 2.71 0.908
Georgeiv's are only slightly better and he has a much better defense in front of him. Think it over before you start making unrealistic statements. Oiler fans have every reason to be concerned Georgeiv isn't any better than Koskinen. Like AT ALL.
Compare Koskinen's numbers vs. Georgeiv:
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
2018-19 Edmonton Oilers NHL 55 2.93 0.906 | 2019-20 Edmonton Oilers NHL 38 2.75 0.917 | PLAYOFFS 4 3.16 0.889 2020-21 Edmonton Oilers NHL 26 3.17 0.899 | 2021-22 Edmonton Oilers NHL 20 3.19 0.900
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
2019-20 New York Rangers NHL 34 3.04 0.910 | 2020-21 New York Rangers NHL 19 2.71 0.905 | 2021-22 New York Rangers NHL 17 2.71 0.908
Georgeiv's are only slightly better and he has a much better defense in front of him. Think it over before you start making unrealistic statements. Oiler fans have every reason to be concerned Georgeiv isn't any better than Koskinen. Like AT ALL.
Defense was not much better during that period. Georgiev is a lot younger and cheaper and is a UFA after this season. Why are you even comparing them?