Bazeek
Registered Lurker
Admittedly I haven't gone digging through licensing agreements to know the details, but I don't think the "stopping shovelware" angle holds much water. If that was the goal I don't see why they'd change the terms for already established, fully developed games. That's a huge rug-pull on what's probably their most important users (developers that have actually released successful Unity games).Interesting. I'm not sure it's as black and white as is being presented in this article. They've got one side of the story, but here's another from The Motley Fool (for what they're worth):
So the idea is that they'll hurt these garbage-game-shovelers via this policy, stopping them from peddling, or at least earning some money from them. Further, Apple's privacy updates also hurt Unity's ability to make money via advertising, one of their two main sources of income. I've also attached the image below of their "profitability". You'll notice all of the numbers are both negative and growing in magnitude. They need to find a way to start earning money, and I think this move is a bit of desperation.
View attachment 743061
I don't know that this is a good move by them, but I think I can understand why they're doing it. The question is, do developers want to have Unity for a price, or not have Unity at all?
From a video gamer's POV: This is bullshit, and this is an example of why I was against owning a digital license to play a game, instead of owning a game outright, in the first place.
I'm also curious as to whether or not they actually can do that. It's not exactly retroactively changing the terms of the agreement, but with how game distribution works in practice these days (i.e. you buy a license but generally don't retrieve a copy of the game until you want to play it) it amounts to the same thing.
Doing this in an attempt to solve cash flow problems? That I believe. "Squeeze our existing customer base for every penny while alienating everyone" has been Oracle's business model for like 3 decades, so maybe it'll work.