That is precisely the damn point. If you spent those millions and millions of dollars on funding research to develop better drugs, then maybe we'd be at a point where those top PEDs aren't as dangerous as they are today.Say development of PEDs is regulated to ensure whatever is produced is relatively "safe". What happens when there is something better than the regulated stuff but would carry unacceptable health risks to be a legal PED in sports? Do you test for that or close your eyes and let athletes assume risks? Read stories of anabolic steroids usage by East German female swimmer and the health consequences it had. Good luck developing something that will have a better impact on performance while carrying less side effects.
I mean, we can cure diseases, we can build a gun from a 3D printer, we can ****ing clone animals. You are going to sit there and tell that it's impossible for us to develop safer PEDs while we are close to being capable of transplanting organs from cloned pigs into humans???
Come on man. Medecine and science is very advance. If we funded research instead of policing, we would already have much safer, and probably more effective, PEDs today.
Nobody is claiming that this is a perfect solution. The point is that the alternative is a massive failure. Find ways to regulate and develop safer PEDs.When you actually do PED specific R&D and produce something with potential there is going to be a whole process to validate effectiveness and health risks. In pharma world this takes forever. You will likely need to test it on actual athletes and not general population unlike typical meds. That is already a very small sample you can work with. While it is in process of being approved, what happens when someone decides to use it in competition? Close your eyes or let them assume risks in which case there is no point in regulation to begin with. Sorry but producing the best PEDs without side effects in all cases is rather unrealistic.
War on drugs will never succeed. Without a doubt the biggest failed war of all time.
Reference to Icarus & Goldman's dilemma is that some will always want to cheat and are willing to take great measures and take big risks to gain advantage. I never said current system is good if you read what I wrote. I'm simply choosing what I believe to be the lesser evil. If you are comfortable with athletes putting in their bodies whatever they want, that is your choice.
Let's not pretend like "health" is the reason these drugs are banned. That is very naive.
I mean, this started talking about Jon Jones, a fighter. So...you care more about what a fighter puts in his body than the fact he's going to go out there and eat a bunch of punches or kicks to the body and head??? How ironic...
Sure, there will always be that 1% who would sell their mother for a chance to win. That isn't much of an argument really. Nobody is claiming that this would make things perfect. It would however eliminate a lot of this nonsense BS where people lose their accomplishments because others haven't failed a test yet.