Vancouver Canucks
Registered User
- Feb 8, 2015
- 14,585
- 2,587
9 or 10M, I bet.He's probably getting 10M flat in Calgary for 8 years
9 or 10M, I bet.He's probably getting 10M flat in Calgary for 8 years
Yea its usually due to lack of cognitive functioningIt's ok, I understand that math is a little difficult for some people
Tkachuk is a good player but he's benefitting significantly from playing with Gaudreau. He's closer to a 65-70 point winger if asked to be the primary offensive player on his line.Calgary might be better off not signing him in my opinion. I would throw the money at Tkachuk and then insulate him from there.
The NJ connection seems like a good fit, but they'd have to shuffle around their top lines a little bit.Unless he inks before end of season/playoffs with Calgary, I think he will get a massive offer from the Devils.
he's a fit with that organization and they are not too far off from getting back into the playoff picture.
He's probably getting 10M flat in Calgary for 8 years
If he says he will re-sign only if Monahan is given another shot next year, Monahan will be here next year
I think I'd be okay with itThe NJ connection seems like a good fit, but they'd have to shuffle around their top lines a little bit.
The NJ connection seems like a good fit, but they'd have to shuffle around their top lines a little bit.
Unless he inks before end of season/playoffs with Calgary, I think he will get a massive offer from the Devils.
he's a fit with that organization and they are not too far off from getting back into the playoff picture.
The barkov and stone ones were signed in way lower tax brakets if your logic is money over the term of the contract, same with kucherov who you brought up before . And I believe panarin and Tavares would have gotten 11x8s if they wanted to stay on the jackets and the islesYou are the one calling it a discount. 10M for Barkov is a fair contract, same as Eichel who is a similar caliber player so 9-10M should be considered "fair" for Gaudreau. Also how is Stone "clearly inferior" when he was coming off an selke finalist season where he put up over a PPG before the trade and nearly 2 pts per game in the playoffs. The only player in the league to sign for 11M+ on an 8 year deal is McDavid. Kane and Toews both got 10.5M x 8 but they also won 3 cups
Absurd hypothetical.
The team is clicking better than ever with Monahan out of the lineup and Gaudreau is pacing for career highs across the board since they've been separated.
If Gaudreau prioritized playing with a friend over being on the best possible team he'd go to Philadelphia to play with his bestie Kevin Hayes.
There's just no world where Tre or Johnny value Monahan's... presence over retaining Tkachuk, Mangi or Kylington.
If Monahan ever has money trouble it could only be due to gross negligence from either himself or his representatives.To add to this. The Flames have had many of Gaudreau's friends on the team, who were here, it didn't work out and then they were gone. See Buddy Robinson and Bill Arnold. I really don't see it as the players feeling betrayed by Gaudreau when things don't work out with the organization. It's the exact opposite. These players are being given chances they otherwise wouldn't due to their association with Gaudreau, and they're likely grateful.
Monahan, due to playing with Gaudreau, was able to sign a relatively large contract as is likely set financially for life. If things aren't working out with the Flames, then he has to look elsewhere. If he can't find a job anywhere else in the NHL, that's 100% on him. It may be injuries, but if that's the case, Monahan is a lot luckier than most players who's careers get derailed by injuries. He signed, and collected on almost all, of the $44,625,000 contract before injuries set in.
Gaudreau may fight to keep Monahan on the team, but he's got to realize that the team cannot work with that contract on the team. I do not see Monahan leaving affecting Gaudreau's decision to stay in any way.
If Monahan ever has money trouble it could only be due to gross negligence from either himself or his representatives.
Whether it's with Calgary or somewhere else it is going to be 8 figures. Not many players are capable of carrying an offense like Johnny is. I think it'll age just fine too, Gaudreau's game isn't built on physical traits that diminish with age. It's all vision and hockey IQ. Great playmakers often age much better than goalscorers.
Alberta has the lowest tax bracket in Canada and they are all paid in USD, after conversion they technically make more money in Alberta right now so that is not a good argument. What you believe about Panarin and Tavares is not reality though and you can't prove it, the only thing you could possibly prove is that San Jose offered Tavares 12x7 and he turned it downThe barkov and stone ones were signed in way lower tax brakets if your logic is money over the term of the contract, same with kucherov who you brought up before . And I believe panarin and Tavares would have gotten 11x8s if they wanted to stay on the jackets and the isles
My point was he might be willing to take a bit of a discount to keep all of them and his bestieAbsurd hypothetical.
The team is clicking better than ever with Monahan out of the lineup and Gaudreau is pacing for career highs across the board since they've been separated.
If Gaudreau prioritized playing with a friend over being on the best possible team he'd go to Philadelphia to play with his bestie Kevin Hayes.
There's just no world where Tre or Johnny value Monahan's... presence over retaining Tkachuk, Mangi or Kylington.