Speculation: Gaudreau seeking $8M annually on new deal with Flames -- Pt. 2

Status
Not open for further replies.

oStealthKiller*

Master Monkey Herder
Jul 2, 2012
1,342
0
Edmonton
Yup. Calgary has all of the leverage, as an Oiler fan I wish he was eligible for an offer-sheet but he isn't.

He literally has next to no rights. The Flames hold a significant bargaining advantage.

JG probably looks at his leverage as not being in the line up, which is almost as big a problem for Calgary as an offer sheet is think
 

tyflames

Registered User
Jul 4, 2010
1,843
26
JG probably looks at his leverage as not being in the line up, which is almost as big a problem for Calgary as an offer sheet is think

This. If they start the season without him it most likely results in early season losses where the points are easier to come by.
 

Halibut

Registered User
Jul 24, 2010
4,377
1
This. If they start the season without him it most likely results in early season losses where the points are easier to come by.

Depends on how they do without him. If they manage to string together some wins and are looking ok, then he might have to accept a deal more favorable to the team. Likely it'll still be shorter term then they want.
 

OvermanKingGainer

#BennettFreed #CurseofTheSpulll #FreeOliver
Feb 3, 2015
16,164
7,197
2022 Cup to Calgary
JG probably looks at his leverage as not being in the line up, which is almost as big a problem for Calgary as an offer sheet is think

It's a two-way street. Gaudreau hates to lose, and he hates to sit out games where he can help the team. If he elects to sit out of the lineup, it will hurt him and it will hurt the team. The team can weather his loss, with Monahan, Backlund, Bennett we have centre depth, with Giordano, Brodie, Hamilton, Jokipakka, Wideman, we have defensive depth, with Elliott/Johnson, we have strong goaltending. I don't know how well Gaudreau weather the whole "sitting out" bit. Even when we beat out the Leafs with Jonas Hiller in net and Gaudreau/Monahan were scratched - he was miserable.
 

ManofSteel55

Registered User
Aug 15, 2013
33,546
14,047
Sylvan Lake, Alberta
So is this a situation of the Flames being cheap, or not having enough cap space? Looks like they have close to 8 million in cap space.

Realilistically, if there's someone you sign 8x8, it's Johnny Gaudreau or Kucherov, not Stamkos. Only reason Stamkos gets the big payday is because he could leave

Neither. It's more of them not trying to set a precedent with signing a guy who really has no bargaining power aside from setting out to an 8 million dollar deal. Treliving is playing hard ball with him because he knows that he doesn't have this type of leverage often. Basically, it will let future guys in similar situations know that they can't hold out for huge paydays, as there are always those guys who want to be paid huge before they really earn it, unlike Gaudreau who has earned his money.
 

Rebels57

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 28, 2014
78,095
125,520
I would do Voracek+ Sanheim for Gaudreau+ 2nd

Close but I pass as a Flyers fan.

Love Gaudreau but Jake is 1 season removed from an 80 point season and Sanheim has top-pairing PMD potential. Sure, we have other guys to fill that role in Ghost and Provorov, but Calgary is still getting more value back. Especially when you factor in Gaudreau's home/away splits and how that can become a factor in a playoff series that you don't have home ice advantage in.
 

yourbestfriend

Registered User
May 28, 2010
268
35
In a vacuum, he probably does deserve 8M per, but with that being said, the flames still gotta think long term.

Bennett will need a contract soon. Even if he signs a 2-3 year bridge, he'll still be up for a big raise when we're paying Jonny.
Brodie will also be getting a big raise in a few years after taking a discount. Both those guys will potentially be 6M players in a few years.

Then the flames still have Gio, Monny and Hamilton on the books.

So yeah, "pay the man his money" is simple to say when you're not projecting and managing cap space for the next 5-7 years.
 

WinterEmpire

Unregistered User
Mar 20, 2011
5,997
215
Vancouver
I really think this contract is going to have a dramatic effect on team building across the NHL. If JG gets 7m or 8m that he is asking for it's not just going to send waves through the Flames organization but it's going to establish a precedence for contracts of young players going forward.

Today there exists the current practice building contenders through the draft mainly because signing FAs is expensive and it's hard to build competitive teams without solid contributions throughout the lineup. Young impact players on cheap contracts always gave these contending teams an edge. What's going to happen now that young players are going to be getting contracts that equal those of older equally talented/more experienced players. Well it's likely that the FA talent pool will increase because even more teams can't afford to keep all their midtier and high end players. Parity will increase and building contending teams may almost be entirely through FA signings and no longer by strong asset management(Trades + Drafting).
 

WesMcCauley

Registered User
Apr 24, 2015
8,616
2,600
I really think this contract is going to have a dramatic effect on team building across the NHL. If JG gets 7m or 8m that he is asking for it's not just going to send waves through the Flames organization but it's going to establish a precedence for contracts of young players going forward.

Today there exists the current practice building contenders through the draft mainly because signing FAs is expensive and it's hard to build competitive teams without solid contributions throughout the lineup. Young impact players on cheap contracts always gave these contending teams an edge. What's going to happen now that young players are going to be getting contracts that equal those of older equally talented/more experienced players. Well it's likely that the FA talent pool will increase because even more teams can't afford to keep all their midtier and high end players. Parity will increase and building contending teams may almost be entirely through FA signings and no longer by strong asset management(Trades + Drafting).

Eberle, Hall, RNH 6 mill or something.
Stammer 7,5 mill.

Not a new thing.
 

KrisLetAngry

MrJukeBoy
Dec 20, 2013
19,231
5,426
Saskatchewan
Yup. Calgary has all of the leverage, as an Oiler fan I wish he was eligible for an offer-sheet but he isn't.

He literally has next to no rights. The Flames hold a significant bargaining advantage.

Ye but then he takes a one year deal let's say 2 million.

Gets 70 points and has rights. And asks for a huge sum like 9 million. Then asks for 8 million again long term
 

Johnnybegood13

Registered User
Jul 11, 2003
8,736
996
JG probably looks at his leverage as not being in the line up, which is almost as big a problem for Calgary as an offer sheet is think
It's a two-way street, when he misses a rather large check that he can never get back he won't want to miss another.
 

L13

Registered User
Oct 1, 2015
1,226
94
It's a two-way street. Gaudreau hates to lose, and he hates to sit out games where he can help the team. If he elects to sit out of the lineup, it will hurt him and it will hurt the team. The team can weather his loss, with Monahan, Backlund, Bennett we have centre depth, with Giordano, Brodie, Hamilton, Jokipakka, Wideman, we have defensive depth, with Elliott/Johnson, we have strong goaltending. I don't know how well Gaudreau weather the whole "sitting out" bit. Even when we beat out the Leafs with Jonas Hiller in net and Gaudreau/Monahan were scratched - he was miserable.

If you think he'd forego millions of dollars in extra income, which is the cumulative value of the difference between a 6.5M AAV and even a 7M AAV, because he couldn't bear to watch the Flames lose a couple of games on TV, you're wrong.
 

Johnnybegood13

Registered User
Jul 11, 2003
8,736
996
If you think he'd forego millions of dollars in extra income, which is the cumulative value of the difference between a 6.5M AAV and even a 7M AAV, because he couldn't bear to watch the Flames lose a couple of games on TV, you're wrong.

If he sits out 3 months to get that $7m he only breaks even. He will sign before the first pay-checks are issued, book it.
 

Soundwave

Registered User
Mar 1, 2007
74,116
30,262
Think the Flames are gonna have to cave on this.

If Gaudreau misses even 4-5 games needlessly that could basically cost them a shot at a playoff berth very potentially given how tight the West is. 4-5 points is all that it takes to tip things in one direction or another.
 
Last edited:

Seanaconda

Registered User
May 6, 2016
9,701
3,442
If he sits out 3 months to get that $7m he only breaks even. He will sign before the first pay-checks are issued, book it.

Unless he changes his mind on term so he can get out of Calgary as fast as he can instead of going longterm. Sign that subban deal and go to arbitration.

Flames might want term but I can't see them letting him sit the whole year. Would be hilarious if he said eff it and went to Europe for a couple years tho
 

Johnnybegood13

Registered User
Jul 11, 2003
8,736
996
I'm just amazed the amount of attention(mostly doom & gloom attention) the Flames/Gaudreau are getting over this, 1200 replies to this thread so far with 90% coming from fans of other teams(mostly Oiler fans)

It's like a wishful obsession that he pulls a Trouba and demands a trade or sits out the year and screws the flames.

What a shift from 2 years ago when 99% of you fine fans said he would never amount to anything in the NHL and now you're scared sh!!less of him. :laugh:
 

Seanaconda

Registered User
May 6, 2016
9,701
3,442
I'm just amazed the amount of attention(mostly doom & gloom attention) the Flames/Gaudreau are getting over this, 1200 replies to this thread so far with 90% coming from fans of other teams(mostly Oiler fans)

It's like a wishful obsession that he pulls a Trouba and demands a trade or sits out the year and screws the flames.

What a shift from 2 years ago when 99% of you fine fans said he would never amount to anything in the NHL and now you're scared sh!!less of him. :laugh:

Not scared of him hahah I just want the deal to be done already. And we get enough flak about mcdavid so it's fun having the tables turned for a moment.

But really I want kucherov and lindholm deals to hurry up too. If this one takes longer it's better for me just cuz I don't have johney hockey on my fantasy team.

Plus you know we are somewhat rivals and having the flames screw up relations with your best player would be pretty funny
 
Last edited:

Aceboogie

Registered User
Aug 25, 2012
32,649
3,896
I'm just amazed the amount of attention(mostly doom & gloom attention) the Flames/Gaudreau are getting over this, 1200 replies to this thread so far with 90% coming from fans of other teams(mostly Oiler fans)

It's like a wishful obsession that he pulls a Trouba and demands a trade or sits out the year and screws the flames.

What a shift from 2 years ago when 99% of you fine fans said he would never amount to anything in the NHL and now you're scared sh!!less of him. :laugh:

We all know flames fans stay out of all oiler and rivals threads too and throw no jabs ever.

Get off your pedestal bud
 

King In The North

Sean Bennett
Jul 9, 2007
12,079
2,530
Winterfell
Not scared of him hahah I just want the deal to be done already. And we get enough flak about mcdavid so it's fun having the tables turned for a moment.

But really I want kucherov and lindholm deals to hurry up too. If this one takes longer it's better for me just cuz I don't have johney hockey on my fantasy team.

Plus you know we are somewhat rivals and having the flames screw up relations with your best player would be pretty funny

But you know what's really funny? That's not how you screw up relations. How you screw up relations is when you give JH a blank cheque but try to do negotiations with every other player.

You don't want Sam Bennett coming in saying "Well you let JH have what he wants why can't I get what I want?"

As Friedman suggested, a deal will be done this week, and all of this won't be talked about again anyway.
 

Seanaconda

Registered User
May 6, 2016
9,701
3,442
But you know what's really funny? That's not how you screw up relations. How you screw up relations is when you give JH a blank cheque but try to do negotiations with every other player.

You don't want Sam Bennett coming in saying "Well you let JH have what he wants why can't I get what I want?"

As Friedman suggested, a deal will be done this week, and all of this won't be talked about again anyway.

Well we don't really know that yet and do you really think Bennett is gonna toss Monahan from top spot and then outproduce Gaudreau? If he does that's a good problem to have. If he takes 8 year term for less than 7 mill a year I'll be impressed by the negotiations and say this was worth it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Ad

Ad