Proposal: Gaudreau for Taylor Hall

yababy

Registered User
Jun 26, 2015
3,443
828
Both want to play at home.
Gaudreau contract at an impasse as he is not committed to Calgary.

Sign Gaudreau to the identical 6M contract as Hall and swap them.

Both kids play at home.

caveat...Chiarelli might have stipulated that Hall not be traded west for x amount of time
 

CatchyTune

JOHN TAVARES IS A MAPLE LEAF
Jan 8, 2016
5,775
4,636
Ontario
I doubt New Jersey trades Hall before he even plays a game for them.

I also think Gaudreau will want more than 6M.
 

Hictor Vedman*

Unregistered Hedman
Sep 30, 2014
2,244
1
Ottawa
NJ is in no position to have to give up such an asset for a player that is, as of right now, unwilling to resign. If it came with a contract extension, sure, the argument could be made further, but I think Calgary would have to take less at this point.
 

ManofSteel55

Registered User
Aug 15, 2013
33,568
14,091
Sylvan Lake, Alberta
First of all, with how much salaries have increased in the last couple of years, I don't think Gaudreau would sign for Hall's cap hit. If he were open to it, he would have signed already I wager.

Second, I don't see New Jersey to impressed with the idea of swapping Hall for Johnny unless they really feel that Johnny is a far superior player. The optics are bad.

Third, Gaudreau's contract isn't exactly at an impasse. There is still time for him to sign.
 

Skobel24

#Ignited
May 23, 2008
16,789
921
Winnipeg
Both want to play at home.
Gaudreau contract at an impasse as he is not committed to Calgary.

Sign Gaudreau to the identical 6M contract as Hall and swap them.

Both kids play at home.

caveat...Chiarelli might have stipulated that Hall not be traded west for x amount of time

At no point has he said he doesn't want to commit to Calgary. Every reliable source there has said they both want a longterm deal, the only thing that's still in the works is the amount.

Regardless, no. IF Johnny is dealt, it's likely to Philly. Not interested in Taylor Hall.
 

yababy

Registered User
Jun 26, 2015
3,443
828
First of all, with how much salaries have increased in the last couple of years, I don't think Gaudreau would sign for Hall's cap hit. If he were open to it, he would have signed already I wager.

Second, I don't see New Jersey to impressed with the idea of swapping Hall for Johnny unless they really feel that Johnny is a far superior player. The optics are bad.

Third, Gaudreau's contract isn't exactly at an impasse. There is still time for him to sign.


Monahan is the franchise player for the Flames and he checked in at 6.375
MacKinnon is the franchise guy for the Avalanche with a deal just inked at 6.3.
Johnny is barking at the moon for a contract more than these #s

Regardless, it would have to be a signed Johnny to NJ - and I think he accepts 6x6 with the understanding that it's to be traded to NJ
 

Skobel24

#Ignited
May 23, 2008
16,789
921
Winnipeg
Monahan is the franchise player for the Flames and he checked in at 6.375
MacKinnon is the franchise guy for the Avalanche with a deal just inked at 6.3.
Johnny is barking at the moon for a contract more than these #s

Regardless, it would have to be a signed Johnny to NJ - and I think he accepts 6x6 with the understanding that it's to be traded to NJ

I disagree. He isn't THE franchise guy. Monahan, Gaudreau, and Brodie are all players that the Flames want to build around.

How is he 'barking at the moon'? Very few details regarding their negotiations have been made public. As for him wanting more, that makes sense. He's a better player than Monahan and MacKinnon.
 

yababy

Registered User
Jun 26, 2015
3,443
828
[QUOTEHe's a better player than Monahan and MacKinnon.[/QUOTE]

no, he isn't.
There is a heirarchy based on position.
#1 Defence 1
#2 Centre
#3 Defence 2
#4 Goaltending
#5 Wingers

Didn't the Taylor Hall trade teach you anything about this heirarchy?
 

Wadewilson

Registered User
Jun 27, 2006
4,486
0
Canada
I don't think NJ does this to be honest.

However I do think Johnny would take less out east, so maybe 6.5x6? I don't think he signs that with the Flames though
 

Mr Positive

Cap Crunch Incoming
Nov 20, 2013
38,087
19,016
I think NJ likes the Hall-Henrique connection, and besides they just went through a whole thing about welcoming Hall to the team and all that. It's just bad form to trade him for Gaudreau now. The trade could easily end up being a bad one just from a player value standpoint in the end also. Never mind that NJ would now have a problem in that they would have to sign Johnny, and do so for more money than the Hall deal, and there's zero chance Calgary would allow Gaudreau and NJ to talk together beforehand.
 

Seachd

Registered User
Mar 16, 2002
25,250
9,881
1. Calgary isn't "home" for Taylor Hall.

2. I have no idea why New Jersey would do this.

Edit: Way to have my back, autocorrect.
 

TGWL

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 28, 2011
16,244
10,981
Monahan is the franchise player for the Flames and he checked in at 6.375
MacKinnon is the franchise guy for the Avalanche with a deal just inked at 6.3.
Johnny is barking at the moon for a contract more than these #s

Regardless, it would have to be a signed Johnny to NJ - and I think he accepts 6x6 with the understanding that it's to be traded to NJ

Monahan isn't the franchise guy for them.
 

Homesick

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 2, 2005
17,114
3,512
Calgary
Both want to play at home.
Gaudreau contract at an impasse as he is not committed to Calgary.

Sign Gaudreau to the identical 6M contract as Hall and swap them.

Both kids play at home.

caveat...Chiarelli might have stipulated that Hall not be traded west for x amount of time
Calgary isn't home for Taylor Hall.
The rest of this is just weird conspiracy theory crap
 

Tkachuk Norris

Registered User
Jun 22, 2012
16,038
7,462
Gaudreau is a franchise player. Stop treating him as anything else. The NA team will shut up all the doubters/non-watchers/haters. He's the second best player on team North America hands down. Hell the gap between him and McDavid at this second isn't that large. Put that into perspective. The guy is a superstar. He makes every player on the ice he plays with better. Only the best players do that. He's one of the few players that can put a team on his back with his offensive abilities.

Taylor Hall is not a franchise player. He's a very, very good player.
 

member 157595

Guest
Didn't Hall play in the OHL? How is Calgary "home" for him? Am I missing something?
 

Ziggdiezan

Registered User
Apr 10, 2015
10,847
5,676
I forget where Hall was born but he spent a good chunk of his life in Kingston so Ottawa would probably be closer to home for him.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad