I think the Bruins are also proof that, as long as you have good management/scouting/development/coaching, you don't have to "win" every trade you make. You can afford to make a mistake or two, and still ice a strong club.
Which goes back to a comment I made a while ago. Judging a GM on their trading resume isn't the best way to look at things because all good GMs have made bad trades at some point, and all bad GMs have made good trades at some point.
Fully agreed on both points.
A lot of that is having good ownership, too. The Bruins have been very stable and well financed for the entirety of the cap era. When you look at their scouting department, it dwarfs ours, and I feel like that says something about how much they're willing to pay their off ice staff, which has resulted in a consistently high quality product on the ice.
The Islanders, on the other hand, I'm guessing like Snow primarily for his willingness to do the job for cheaper than hiring a good GM would cost. Same probably goes for the coaching staffs, both past and present. The only coach we've hired since Wang took over that actually had NHL head coaching experience was a guy who was blacklisted by every other team, and I have little doubt that a lot of that is the budget only allows a salary at whatever the coaching equivalent of minimum wage is.
I was hoping this was something that would change under Ledecky/Malkin, but it appears they're running the team with Wang's advice, so I doubt it will.