Post-Game Talk: GAME 9 - THROW THE CAT OFF THE CLIFF!!!! - BRUINS 3 Sunrise 2 F/OT

McGarnagle

Yes.
Aug 5, 2017
30,352
41,636
Linus Ullmark since signing in Boston:

70-16-4, 2.12 and .929 SV%
And when we signed him most of us (myself included) had some really bad takes about it. We've got Vladar and Swayman! Tuukka's going to come back in December! Why are we giving $4 million in cap space to some goalie who had a fluke year on a historically bad Buffalo team?
 

McGarnagle

Yes.
Aug 5, 2017
30,352
41,636
I think 2 games for Mac would be appropriate and I wouldn't argue that.

It's funny on the main board thread how it's all posters with Leaf, Hab, and Canuck avatars claiming DIRTY PLAYER SHOULD BE 5+ GAMES!
 

Aussie Bruin

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 3, 2019
10,840
24,937
Victoria, Aus
My guess is 3 games for McAvoy. Not a lot of force, OEL wasn't injured, but the hit was definitely head first, blind side and was, in hockey terms, miles off the puck. I would argue that it was slightly worse than Clifton's because although Cliffy's was higher impact and put his opponent out of the game, he was making a valid check on a player with possession. Whereas McAvoy's was completely unnecessary and either cheap or very careless. So on the basis Clifton got 2, I say 3 for Chucky. Anything from 2-4 I could accept though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sooshii and Gordoff

Dennis Bonvie

Registered User
Dec 29, 2007
31,365
20,876
Connecticut
My guess is 3 games for McAvoy. Not a lot of force, OEL wasn't injured, but the hit was definitely head first, blind side and was, in hockey terms, miles off the puck. I would argue that it was slightly worse than Clifton's because although Cliffy's was higher impact and put his opponent out of the game, he was making a valid check on a player with possession. Whereas McAvoy's was completely unnecessary and either cheap or very careless. So on the basis Clifton got 2, I say 3 for Chucky. Anything from 2-4 I could accept though.

That would seem to be his only defense.

It certainly wasn't careless or accidental.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gordoff

GloveSave1

*** 15 ***
Jun 11, 2003
18,140
10,162
N.Windham, CT
That would seem to be his only defense.

It certainly wasn't careless or accidental.
Yup. 2 games for intentional head contact for the glancing blow to the face. This was not through the head, it was across the face. The damage from this is about as much as getting slapped across the face.

Two plus the ejection is plenty for the intentional act to the head. From there there’s not much substance. Just the obligatory show from OEL. He got up and had no problem complaining to the ref after his performance was complete.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Carl Hungus

GloveSave1

*** 15 ***
Jun 11, 2003
18,140
10,162
N.Windham, CT
I think 2 games for Mac would be appropriate and I wouldn't argue that.

It's funny on the main board thread how it's all posters with Leaf, Hab, and Canuck avatars claiming DIRTY PLAYER SHOULD BE 5+ GAMES!
Yeah, it’s high drama for a guy that’s took no injury whatsoever. Yeah, I’m not counting the obligatory rolling around for 30 seconds. Nobody should buy that after he popped right up to argue.

2 is good. 4 is excessive. More than 4 is Bruins hating.
 

Alicat

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 26, 2005
89,663
102,251
Norman, OK
Yeah, it’s high drama for a guy that’s took no injury whatsoever. Yeah, I’m not counting the obligatory rolling around for 30 seconds. Nobody should buy that after he popped right up to argue.

2 is good. 4 is excessive. More than 4 is Bruins hating.
This is what pisseds me off. Sure textbook interference but OEL's sell job makes a mockery of the game.
 

GloveSave1

*** 15 ***
Jun 11, 2003
18,140
10,162
N.Windham, CT
3 max is wht it should have been. He got the extra game because Paul Maurice whines incessantly
Heh. Imagine if OEL was actually hurt?

I guess I can live with 4 seeing that he has other questionable face hits. It’s a bit much. But whatever. True, you just never know with league. They could have been dramatic and given him 10 and I wouldn’t be in complete shock.

I’ll take 4 and move on. No biggie with our start.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gordoff

bruins19

Registered User
Aug 11, 2005
1,650
3,137
It's so crazy for him to throw out this rumor that Jake was drunk and that's why he was late to the team meeting but NOBODY else has said it, published an article on it, or commented on it. It's irresponsible by him.

But then again, Sean Avery is an absolute douchebag so I don't believe a word he says on anything. Lol
I still remember him getting PNG’d in Dallas and his sloppy seconds comment about Elisha Cuthbert and Dion Phenouf. There is a special place in hell for d-bags like him. Here’s hoping the turn up the heat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mione134

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad