GDT: Game #82. Pens in Philly. 3:30 pm Sat.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Dipsy Doodle

Rent A Barn
May 28, 2006
76,984
21,718
Hopefully Olczyk has a good cry and a stiff drink at intermission so he can forget about the Fehr non-call that shouldn't have been a penalty anyway.

If he doesn't, we'll probably hear about it another 3 or 4 times.
 

TheSniper26

Registered User
Oct 2, 2005
4,783
689
Youngstown
Actually you are ignoring things I said. You keep talking about how deep in his crease Murray was but that's irrelevant because it is legal to be in the crease with possession of the puck. It was incidental contact and should not have been goaltender interference in my opinion. You disagree and that's fine.

But I have no trouble reading and I have no desire to waste anybody's time by trolling them.

So by this logic, a guy on a breakaway could cut across the crease and elbow the goalie in the head before putting the puck in as long as he keeps possession of the puck while doing it?
 

chethejet

Registered User
Feb 4, 2012
8,724
1,933
Flyers win against the AHL Pens and they face the Caps. I would love to play the crap team in the second round fully loaded. Pens would embarrass them in the playoffs. Caps spank them anyway, but would love the opportunity to crush them.
 

KIRK

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
109,700
51,216
So by this logic, a guy on a breakaway could cut across the crease and elbow the goalie in the head before putting the puck in as long as he keeps possession of the puck while doing it?

As long as it's incidental, apparently . . . :popcorn:
 

IcedCapp

Registered User
Aug 7, 2009
36,004
11,758
Team actually looks like they've stopped skating since The Great Zatsby came in.
 

Hophog

Registered User
Aug 7, 2006
1,776
1
Hershey, PA
Hopefully Olczyk has a good cry and a stiff drink at intermission so he can forget about the Fehr non-call that shouldn't have been a penalty anyway.

If he doesn't, we'll probably hear about it another 3 or 4 times.

Ha!Ha!Ha! You're not kidding. He cried about that not being called (I've never seen it called, ever) for a good 5 minutes after it happened. It is so transparent how he feels about the Penguins. Hell it took half the game for anyone to mention that the Penguins are playing without half their team and none of the announcers are talking about the Flyers only being able to score against our 3rd best goalie.
 

iamjs

Registered User
Oct 1, 2008
12,593
959
Shocking.

Zatkoff looking like he's doing a Jesus on the cross pose.

Jesus actually saves

dhMeAzK.gif
 

FDR

Registered User
Apr 27, 2015
165
1
So in a must win game with the playoffs on the line Schenn has the puck on his stick and his main concern is delivering a flying ass to the goalie's face? I don't buy it.

In a must win game, i'm doing whatever it takes to win. I'm not saying it was his intent but he saw the angle and decided to take the goalie with him in an attempt to score. I'd have done the same thing knowing fully well to expect retaliation.
 

NewAgeOutlaw

Belie Dat!
Jul 15, 2011
30,476
8,286
412/724
So by this logic, a guy on a breakaway could cut across the crease and elbow the goalie in the head before putting the puck in as long as he keeps possession of the puck while doing it?

No. That would be an elbowing penalty. And you can't try to check the goalie. Schenn didn't try to check Murray, he was attempting to make a scoring play and contact occured. My opinion is if a Pen did the same thing and had been called for interference I'd be pissed so I'd be a hypocrite to expect it to be a penalty on the Flyers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad