Actually you are ignoring things I said. You keep talking about how deep in his crease Murray was but that's irrelevant because it is legal to be in the crease with possession of the puck. It was incidental contact and should not have been goaltender interference in my opinion. You disagree and that's fine.
But I have no trouble reading and I have no desire to waste anybody's time by trolling them.
I have said why the depth in crease is relevant. Schenn is allowed to be in the crease.
until he makes contact with the goalies head. At this point, Schenn's intentions are irrelevant. He was entirely in the goalie's crease, made no attempt to avoid contact (ever heard that phrase before?) and hit the goalie in the head.
This is a textbook penalty.
I've read everything you've said. I've responded to it.
Your reply is "jam plays" which have absolutely no relevance to the discussion.
This also wasn't incidental.