GDT: Game #82. Pens in Philly. 3:30 pm Sat.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Daeni10

Kunitz was there
Dec 31, 2013
5,425
1,919
Cologne
It wasnt JZ fault though. It was redirected 2 times.
He looked kinda weird though which makes him look worse than he actually is
 

Fordy

Registered User
May 28, 2008
26,916
3,172
more dumb nbc ****. no one is ever trying to freeze the puck on the boards anymore. it's the current year
 

NewAgeOutlaw

Belie Dat!
Jul 15, 2011
30,476
8,286
412/724
You're not having a disagreement. You're telling me I'm overreacting. I'm referencing rules. You're telling me I'm wrong. I say "principle point of contact was the head and Murray was deep in his crease, you can't do that."

You respond with, "so now you can't name the puck off the goalies pads?"

You're not responding to anything I'm saying. You may not be saying something insulting, but you're being insulting by wasting my time and just ignoring what's being said.

Actually you are ignoring things I said. You keep talking about how deep in his crease Murray was but that's irrelevant because it is legal to be in the crease with possession of the puck. It was incidental contact and should not have been goaltender interference in my opinion. You disagree and that's fine.

But I have no trouble reading and I have no desire to waste anybody's time by trolling them.
 

Fordy

Registered User
May 28, 2008
26,916
3,172
what is zatkoff DOING? pointing at the puck???? directing air traffic?
 

Ugene Magic

EVIL LAUGH
Oct 17, 2008
55,300
19,713
Pittsburgh
The longer it goes on the less I care. I want us to win this game and ruin the day for all those troglodytes

Preferably with Sheary getting the GWG. I know, I don't wanna get greedy, but it would be nice

That'd be nice if it happens, but I'm fine if it doesn't.

Zatkozz just seems to rely on the butterfly 100% of the time. I doubt it's gonna get much better.
 

mpp9

Registered User
Dec 5, 2010
32,617
5,074
Another goal from the Kessel line. Take it to OT. Then lose and tell Boston to go **** themselves.
 

IcedCapp

Registered User
Aug 7, 2009
36,004
11,758
Actually you are ignoring things I said. You keep talking about how deep in his crease Murray was but that's irrelevant because it is legal to be in the crease with possession of the puck. It was incidental contact and should not have been goaltender interference in my opinion. You disagree and that's fine.

But I have no trouble reading and I have no desire to waste anybody's time by trolling them.

I have said why the depth in crease is relevant. Schenn is allowed to be in the crease.

until he makes contact with the goalies head. At this point, Schenn's intentions are irrelevant. He was entirely in the goalie's crease, made no attempt to avoid contact (ever heard that phrase before?) and hit the goalie in the head.

This is a textbook penalty.

I've read everything you've said. I've responded to it.

Your reply is "jam plays" which have absolutely no relevance to the discussion.

This also wasn't incidental.
 

Ogelthorpe

Who do you play for?
Jul 21, 2010
2,836
233
I'm pretty sure both MAF and Murray will be ready for game 1. I don't think that Murray plays unless they know MAF was going to be ready.
 

SirBrad

Registered User
Sep 30, 2009
11,010
1,625
Zatkoff be like:

Cal-Seething-April-9-Wall.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad