GDT: Game # 79 - New York Rangers @ Boston Bruins - 3pm EST - ABC (The Day to Day edition)

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
I thought GG was old school but the Rangers haven’t really gooned it up or played chippy much all year. We don’t back down but we don’t really initiate either.
 
What's the rulebook say about hits from behind like that? Genuinely asking.
I believe it's this:

A check from behind is a check delivered on a player who is not aware of the impending hit, therefore unable to protect or defend himself, and contact is made on the back part of the body. When a player intentionally turns his body to create contact with his back, no penalty shall be assessed.

This link was from 2014, so I don't know if it's since been updated. Guessing they thought Fox turned intentionally?
 
I believe it's this:

A check from behind is a check delivered on a player who is not aware of the impending hit, therefore unable to protect or defend himself, and contact is made on the back part of the body. When a player intentionally turns his body to create contact with his back, no penalty shall be assessed.

This link was from 2014, so I don't know if it's since been updated. Guessing they thought Fox turned intentionally?
That “intentional” part of the rule is stupid af. Unless you’re being controlled by a remote control, everything they do is intentional. Who unintentionally decides to turn? I never turned around and had to say, “oh my bad, I didn’t mean to do that.”
 
I can't stand when the teams plays like this.

just. shoot. the. f***in. puck.

we get good looks in the slot and pass. It's braindead and it has happened every so often throughout the season
 
  • Like
Reactions: smoneil
Yeah next time he should just say "I'm not gonna fight this guy because he's much bigger than me" and I'm sure you'll love that.
....oh no. I would have preferred if he beat him up better. I think things are getting misunderstood.
 
That “intentional” part of the rule is stupid af. Unless you’re being controlled by a remote control, everything they do is intentional. Who unintentionally decides to turn? I never turned around and had to say, “oh my bad, I didn’t mean to do that.”
The distinction is "I'm going to turn around to do some hockey thing" versus "I'm going to turn around so this guy gets a penalty."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad