You’re right, the league is so inconsistent it wasn’t a terrible call and the habs PP is so brutal you take that chance. Marner’s brain dead penalty buried Keefe.Was Keefe stupid to challenge for goaltender interference? I find that they are so inconsistent that I don't know what is or isn't interference, was this called correctly and was Keefe wrong?
I think the challenge was the right call, it was a toss up call for me, not egregious goaltender interference but plenty of goals have been called back for less.Was Keefe stupid to challenge for goaltender interference? I find that they are so inconsistent that I don't know what is or isn't interference, was this called correctly and was Keefe wrong?
The best team won last night.The best team doesn't always win in the playoffs . . .
How did they play at home in Games 1, 2 and 5?You guys put all the blame on Marner and Matthews, but like I said in another thread they are playing against Danault. McKinnon once said Danault is the toughest player he ever played against. Neutralizing the best players is his specialty...
At home the leaf will have the last change, they will probably play better since Danault won't always be in their path.
This is why Nylander is getting all the points, his line is not up against Danault...
Campbell was already way way out of his crease, it was almost as stupid as Montreal’s challenge earlier and that’s saying something. The coach himself said he wasn’t optimistic so why risk it on a 1-0 score? Brutal call and it was 1000 percent going to fail, I was literally laughing that any hockey mind thought that was coming back. Anything is possible, but the timing and chances of it working, major unforced error and he rightfully owns it.I think the challenge was the right call, it was a toss up call for me, not egregious goaltender interference but plenty of goals have been called back for less.
Not to mention the Habs PP has been brutal and we kill off that penalty 95% of the time anyway.. cant predict Marner would calmly and casually flip the puck into the stands.
Thats good with me.I’m still mind blown by the lack of adjustments by Keefe and the ones he made (breaking up our best line?????) have been equally as mind blowing.
At this point, I’d roll with;
Galch - Kerfoot - Nylander
Hyman - Matthews - Spezza
Mikheyev - Foligno - Marner
Engvall - Brooks - Simmonds
Sorry to Joe.
Not that I can blame him.Yeah what’s his deal? Is he too good to hit now?
Thats good with me.
If this is the last game of the year, I woild rather see Brooks over Thormton.
One is on the way in, and one is on the way out.
I mean, I agree that it was likely to count (i would have said good goal) but given what we've seen over the course of the years with interference reviews I think the chances of it coming back were greater than the chances of the Habs scoring on the resulting PP for a failed challenge.Campbell was already way way out of his crease, it was almost as stupid as Montreal’s challenge earlier and that’s saying something. The coach himself said he wasn’t optimistic so why risk it on a 1-0 score? Brutal call and it was 1000 percent going to fail, I was literally laughing that any hockey mind though that was coming back. Anything is possible, but the timing and chances of it working, major unforced error and he rightfully owns it.
I’m still mind blown by the lack of adjustments by Keefe and the ones he made (breaking up our best line?????) have been equally as mind blowing.
At this point, I’d roll with;
Galch - Kerfoot - Nylander
Hyman - Matthews - Spezza
Mikheyev - Foligno - Marner
Engvall - Brooks - Simmonds
Sorry to Joe.
You guys put all the blame on Marner and Matthews, but like I said in another thread they are playing against Danault. McKinnon once said Danault is the toughest player he ever played against. Neutralizing the best players is his specialty...
At home the leaf will have the last change, they will probably play better since Danault won't always be in their path.
This is why Nylander is getting all the points, his line is not up against Danault...
He didn’t know your last paragraph so that’s irrelevant to his decision, and the chances were zero and I was embarrassed he actually called a challenge. So the best we can do is say we might hit the lottery? I expect good decisions, this one was brutal.I mean, I agree that it was likely to count (i would have said good goal) but given what we've seen over the course of the years with interference reviews I think the chances of it coming back were greater than the chances of the Habs scoring on the resulting PP for a failed challenge.
Marner clears the puck like a normal person instead of screwing around with a little flip/lob and it doesn't even matter we lose the challenge.
regular season vs playoffs, nite vs dayOh the mighty Phil Danault is it? The guy that Matthews torched how many times during the regular season?
I've disabled all the notifications for the Leafs on all the apps I have on my phone and won't be watching the game. I will check the scores next day.