leg godt
hey this isn't there interesting tidbits threadYeah yeah play well I know. The original name is Lego, derived from leg godt. So says my t-shirt from Legoland Billund.
hey this isn't there interesting tidbits thread
Next orders of business for the Blue Jackets:
1. Find Brinks truck
2. Fill it with money
3. Back it up to the Johansen residence
We can't afford to lose this guy.
This thread is a prime example of the bipolarness of HF. We went from sucks trade everyone to Cup contenders.
Went to bed after the 1st, lol.
One thing on the waved off goal - Didn't look like Foligno was anywhere close. The SJ guy was laying on top of Niemi.
Great comeback.
I'm pretty sure at one point Wennberg was centering Cracknell and Boll. What's funny is, until I read that from someone's comment (either here or elsewhere), I completely forgot Wennberg was in this game tonight. He was extremely invisible for someone who played almost 3 minutes on the PP and close to 14 minutes total in the game.
He had no hits, no shots on goal, no penalty minutes, nothing.. not even a giveaway or a takeaway. Just ice time and a -1 rating. 33% at faceoffs, too.
Classic HF. The guys who didn't bother to stay up and watch the team log on the next morning and criticize the comments. Must be nice to be so calm and collected and unemotional during a crazy ass game.
Classic HF. The guys who didn't bother to stay up and watch the team log on the next morning and criticize the comments. Must be nice to be so calm and collected and unemotional during a crazy ass game.
This is what kills me after every game. A select few self-righteous posters like to chime in on comments made during the ebb and flow of the game.
Not sure if this was aimed at me or not, but whatever. I guarantee you that Richards is telling the boys the same things this morning. Only because your post came right after mine.
Invisible rookies should become visible in the AHL.
Watching the slow motion replay of the disallowed goal, I agree that it was a BS call. The only guys interfering with the goalie were the two Sharks players. Not only was Foligno not interfering with him, but it was even questionable if he was in the crease when the puck went in. However, I don't fault the War Room. I think they back the Refs on their call, just as I think they would have allowed the goal had the on-ice officials called it a good goal. Glad the boys made it a moot point.
they will when 17 and 38 return i am fairly sure
they called incidental contact, not goalie interferenceWas it even reviewable? I thought judgement calls by refs on goalie inteference weren't able to be reviewed, but didn't pay close attention to the new video review rules.