GDT: Game 51: Columbus at Montreal | 1/26 7:30PM EST

[DJA]

FSO not showing a replay. bush league

 

[We Want Ten]

That's not a goal.

 

[punk_o_holic]

Should be no goal. Barely

 

[DJA]

lol. these fans are funny

 

[Johansen2Foligno]

The bench reactions were pretty funny

 

[CBJWerenski8]

oh man thats in.

 

[Socks]

Haha suck it crowd!

Oh damn that's close.

 

[Jackets Woodchuck]

PK is pretty good.
5V5 is pretty bad.

So that's why we keep taking penalties.

By the way, anybody listening to the radio broadcast?

 

[We Want Ten]

I do think the NHL needs to adopt the NFL standard of breaking the plane to count as a score.

 

[Halfboard]

That looked like a Habs goal to me...

 

[The Jones Zone]

worked out well

we were gassed on that icing

 

[EspenK]

we dodged a break there

 

[KlichkoBro*]

Even Montreal announcers said that was a "no-goal".

 

[The Jones Zone]

wow close but no goal

 

[Johansen2Foligno]

Korpisalo's best save all night

 

[Socks]

Man. So freaking close. But thanks be to the hockey gods lol.

 

[CBJWerenski8]

I do think the NHL needs to adopt the NFL standard of breaking the plane to count as a score.

What do you mean? As in the puck on the line = goal?

 

[punk_o_holic]

Gallagher's reaction was funny when he was watching the replay. He went from, "That's in for sure, well maybe not, damn it's so close."

 

[CarolinaBlueJacket]

we dodged a break there

The Jackets have dodged many breaks over the years but actually caught a break there.
I knew what you meant.

 

[We Want Ten]

What do you mean? As in the puck on the line = goal?

If the nose of the puck crosses over the red line inside the net it should be a goal. Instead of needing the whole puck to cross over. So somewhere between the NFL rule and the current NHL rule I guess.

 

[Socks]

Gallagher's reaction was funny when he was watching the replay. He went from, "That's in for sure, well maybe not, damn it's so close."

Wild Bill on the bench shaking his head like "Nope didn't happen. Never saw it." Was funny too.

 

[We Want Ten]

Maybe Rychel will make an appearance here this period.

 

[Jaxs]

If the nose of the puck crosses over the red line inside the net it should be a goal. Instead of needing the whole puck to cross over. So somewhere between the NFL rule and the current NHL rule I guess.

I think it is fine the way it is.

 

[SuperGenius]

I do think the NHL needs to adopt the NFL standard of breaking the plane to count as a score.

What does this mean?

They do have a standard. If it's across, it's a goal. If it isn't, it isn't. It's as straightforward as can be.

If the nose of the puck crosses over the red line inside the net it should be a goal. Instead of needing the whole puck to cross over. So somewhere between the NFL rule and the current NHL rule I guess.

I don't see how this is any different other than increasing the scoring area by an inch or so. What will this accomplish, really?

 

[db2011]

Pucks don't have noses!