GDT: GAME 49 - Wednesday, January 22nd, 2025 - Winnipeg Jets at Colorado Avalanche - 8:30pm CST - TSN3 - CJOB/Power 97

[Howard Chuck]

Okay that's enough time to look at it

No kidding. I hate that. Review it or don’t.

 

[kanadalainen]

Bednar looks like a badger took a shine to his skull

 

[Howard Chuck]

More crash and bang!!!!!

 

[Adam da bomb]

Josh putting up the points.

Yeah he's rebounded nicely

Coach really doesn’t trust that pair and are mostly running top 4.

 

[bustamente]

It's almost the end of the period just get the F N puck out

 

[John Agar]

Magic knees...

The Bees Knees...

Jeez...

 

[SUX2BU]

Good road period

 

[kanadalainen]

54 having fun dealing with MacK

 

[Jet]

Schiefele has to be stronger than that

 

[bustamente]

Well we got a chance, gonna be tough third

 

[B33R LEAGUE]

That took a long time to review.

Im curious, if its a league review, no penalty to other team, but...

If its a coaches challenge review, and determined a good goal, then its a penalty because they were wrong?

Im confused. What determines when its considered league review vs coaches challenge?

 

[Jet]

Lol tsn production loves the Macarena

 

[GreatSaveEssensa]

So who called the review? It was called a good goal in the ice so why wasnt Colorado given a delay of game?

 

[kanadalainen]

Schuffles need to throttle MacK, bend him to his will

 

[AlaskaJet]

Vilardi is such a mechanic and a McGyver huge Energizer Bunny around the net. Multitasker primo!

 

[Xavier Laflamme]

Schiefele has to be stronger than that

Scheifs has been a little off since that big hit he took a couple of games ago.

 

[kanadalainen]

Really nice pass by the Gus Bus to Baron von

 

[Hank Chinaski]

So who called the review? It was called a good goal in the ice so why wasnt Colorado given a delay of game?

I think it was an automatic review. Just making sure it wasn’t kicked in.

 

[GeorgeJETson]

That took a long time to review.

Im curious, if its a league review, no penalty to other team, but...

If its a coaches challenge review, and determined a good goal, then its a penalty because they were wrong?

Im confused. What determines when its considered league review vs coaches challenge?

Coach issues the challenge to get the goal overturned.
The league reviews the goal to find any excuse to have it overturned because it won't maximize profits.

 

[sipowicz]

Keep Gus in the lineup when Lowry’s back and sit Perfetan who’s useless!

 

[johnnyonthspot]

I think Vilardi likes playing for the Jets and hope he signs long term but fear he won't .

 

[Adam da bomb]

Wonder if fleury comes out for miller or Heinola next game.

 

[Hank Chinaski]

That took a long time to review.

Im curious, if its a league review, no penalty to other team, but...

If its a coaches challenge review, and determined a good goal, then its a penalty because they were wrong?

Im confused. What determines when it’s considered league review vs coaches challenge?

Automatic review to determine if puck entered the net, if it was kicked or gloved in, if it was hit with a high stick, or if there was a missed stoppage prior to the goal. (EDIT missed stoppage is a coach challenge, nvm).

Coaches challenge is for potential offside and goalie interference.

 

[tbcwpg]

I think Vilardi likes playing for the Jets and hope he signs long term but fear he won't .

Admire the commitment to the bit .

Nice period from the team.

 

[GeorgeJETson]

I think Vilardi likes playing for the Jets and hope he signs long term but fear he won't .

Once he's about to hit UFA, we trade him for PLD plus 1st and a prospect.