GDT: Game 35: New York Rangers @ Tampa Bay Lightning, 7 pm ET, MSG

Status
Not open for further replies.

CasusBelli

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 6, 2017
13,890
12,951
I really don’t understand how there’s any confusion. He kicked Shety’s skate out (interference by itself), but because of all of the pressure, Shesty couldn’t get back on his skates. He was just scrambling.
Right: I saw Mika hook and Jeannot bump the goalie. That should be two penalties. But one could argue that Igor had plenty of time to get back into position before the disallowed goal. Had the goal been immediately after the interference, I’d argue otherwise.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Filip Chytil

hardnosed

Registered User
Feb 27, 2017
1,500
1,464
Right: I saw Mika hook and Jeannot bump the goalie. That should be two penalties. But one could argue that Igor had plenty of time to get back into position before the disallowed goal. Had the goal been immediately after the interference, I’d argue otherwise.
Did they call that particular hook on Mika? Or did it occur previously? Maybe they saw that on replay and gave him the penalty. If so, never saw that before
 

ecemleafs

Registered User
Jan 4, 2009
19,824
5,152
New York
Right: I saw Mika hook and Jeannot bump the goalie. That should be two penalties. But one could argue that Igor had plenty of time to get back into position before the disallowed goal. Had the goal been immediately after the interference, I’d argue otherwise.
If shesty aint knocked down hes never out of position. Clear as day interference.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KOVALEV022473

CasusBelli

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 6, 2017
13,890
12,951
Did they call that particular hook on Mika? Or did it occur previously? Maybe they saw that on replay and gave him the penalty. If so, never saw that before
I think the latter, which surprised me as well. I didn’t see a hook other than the one prior to the Jeannot bump.
 

2Leetch_94

Kreid Me A River
Sep 16, 2005
5,310
3,576
New Jersey
Did they call that particular hook on Mika? Or did it occur previously? Maybe they saw that on replay and gave him the penalty. If so, never saw that before
They were calling the penalty until TB scored. They scored on a delayed penalty, when they wiped the goal away, the penalty was assessed instead.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KOVALEV022473

Machinehead

HFNYR MVP
Jan 21, 2011
147,399
125,293
NYC
One of the reasons I want to move Vesey up is that the line is pretty effective but there's a big ceiling on how much that trio can score. It feels like a waste of his play-driving.

We'll see how it shakes out, tho. Maybe we make an upgrade elsewhere and they're just an effective grind line. That's not the end of the world.

Besides, somebody making Pitlick and Goodrow effective is like removing bad players from the lineup.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DanielBrassard

hardnosed

Registered User
Feb 27, 2017
1,500
1,464
They were calling the penalty until TB scored. They scored on a delayed penalty, when they wiped the goal away, the penalty was accessed instead.
My point is, if the penalty occured while Mika and that guy were in the crease, wouldn't that negate the goalie interference since the guy was being hooked?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad