2013 Luongo looks great if the offense could score more than 1 goal in a game and he racked up a few more wins.
He could rack up a few more wins if he wasn't so consistent in letting in a stinker every game.
2013 Luongo looks great if the offense could score more than 1 goal in a game and he racked up a few more wins.
Or maybe our team could score more than 1 ****ing goal in a game. Your Luongo hate is getting pretty tiresome. I don't care what kind of system this team is playing, they should be able to score more than 1 goal. No forward on this team can shoot well. It's pathetic. Please, tell me more about how you predicted the Hawks to score 4 goals tonight.
He could rack up a few more wins if he wasn't so consistent in letting in a stinker every game.
Ding ding ding. Tells you its not them thats the problem.
I have no issues with benching a player that deserves. I do have a problem with benching one player when he deserves it and not another when they deserve it.
No one is skewing the numbers. He put up a .931 SVP tonight yet people are still complaining. Funny how when the stats look good for him all of a sudden the stats don't matter, but when they look bad then that's all they count.
When watching the games, tonight in particular, he played well. Let in a bad goal by my judgement, but these things happen. You can't expect to win every game 1-0, and that's exactly what the Canucks needed Luongo to do in 6 of the last 7 games.
Luongo shouldn't have to be Dallas series 2007 Lu for us to make a playoff spot.
Aquilinis **** the bed not allowing a Lu buyout
Saying "2 goals or more" when he's been consistently allowing 2 goals is misleading. The team is still undefeated outside of shootouts when scoring more than a single goal.
Luongo has to improve, certainly. But there are plenty of teams - including the Blackhawks - who would love to have almost a guaranteed win when scoring more than one goal. Our goaltending is certainly good enough for us to be a top team, if we could score at the same rate as the better teams in the league.
Burrows is god awful this season. 3 assists in 13 games.
Can't live up to the contract.
LOL, right over your head bud.
You can't expect to win every game 1-0, and that's exactly what the Canucks needed Luongo to do in 6 of the last 7 games.
absolutely true, but that's also the issue...luongo should at the very least match the goaltending performance at the opposite end of the rink, and there's been way too many games so far where he's been the inferior goaltender or let in a softie at an important juncture in the game
another point is that it's not 2007 anymore...the excellent post showing the increase in average save percentage around the league demonstrated the increase in quality around the league, as well as showing that he's statistically below average at this point
Misleading?Saying "2 goals or more" when he's been consistently allowing 2 goals is misleading. The team is still undefeated outside of shootouts when scoring more than a single goal.
Luongo has to improve, certainly. But there are plenty of teams - including the Blackhawks - who would love to have almost a guaranteed win when scoring more than one goal. Our goaltending is certainly good enough for us to be a top team, if we could score at the same rate as the better teams in the league.
Not if they don't have players who can finish
Daniel Sedin isn't the goal scorer he once was
Henrik never was
Burrows is what everyone thought he was, a product of the Sedins goal scoring wise
Kesler is up and down
Santa Claus, Higgins, and Hansen mostly rely on hard work to score goals, they don't have a lot of natural skill.
If Kassian could get his head out of his ass and learn to play without the puck he might be a decent fit in the top six since he has a natural ability to score goals imo
Torts has this team playing the right way put they just don't have goal scorers
That's not completely fair; I grew up watching the Alex Mogilny and Mark Messier Canucks. I know what a crappy team is like. It's just depressing watching this roster slowly decline from its heyday. I agree that that 2011 team was one of the best we will ever see, and every season since then we've just been a little bit worse than the year before. We are aging, and that's what made the Schneider trade such a gut bunch. Luongo is not the player he was; the Sedins are not the players they were, Burrows, Kesler, etc. It's depressing to watch.
The only young forward we have is Kassian, and he got stapled to the bench today because (I assume) Torts was finally sick of his bone-headed play. It's depressing watching us slowly decline into the crap team that we are probably going to be in a few years, unless our drafting and development really turns us around really fast.
And this isn't a "chicken little," I've been saying the same thing for awhile now.
We didn't win a single game 1-0 btw for some years now with Luongo in net. The games we won 1-0 was with Schneider and it happened 2 times last year which was a key reason we made the playoffs last year.
How many goals does LA score?
Their scoring should be more consistent than it has been, because of the higher shot rates, but conversion rates have not been there over this span. That should normalize over time. But throughout, their scoring chance against rate has been pretty good. It's only Luongo's play heading inthe other direction that has limited their ability to win on either end.
You mean he should be letting in 1 or 0 goals every game?
Maybe he could rack up a few more wins if our offense could score a ****ing goal?
Misleading?
It's a ****ing joke. Guy is allowing 2 goals or less most of the time and we're griping about needing 3.
We need two goals to get a single point. We can't even do that.
Luongo lost is one point tonight. The lack of finish lost us the other.
kassian's play without the puck is not what you have to worry about. what you have to worry about is his decision making with the puck in his own end. it's almost universally awful. as soon as he figures out he has to make the simple play, he's fine.
Luongo looked equally sketchy against Columbus. This is a trend, and it has nothing to do with the offense.
Anyone who can't see that simply can't analyze objectively. It'd be like saying the Canucks played well if they won the shootout against Florida. If Daniel buries that shot late in the third and they win it in OT, would that have made Luongo's performance any better? Nope.
I think MS posted a few days ago how if Luongo could allow us to win games where we score 2 or less than the team would already have 6 more points. Instead, both our goalies are basically at or below replacement level netminding. Really, someone who could be acquired for pennies to the dollar like Andersen/Fasth would be giving the Canucks much better bang for their buck right now.
As for scoring; well that's a bigger issue altogether. There isn't an abundance of scoring fowards floating around the league looking for jobs. Really just have to hope that Gillis can manage assets wisely and try and pull off a trade for a young potential top-6 player that can grow with the team. A Goligoski for Neal type deal is about the only hope that this team can contend this year IMO.
You don't seem to understand that your play on a single night doesn't make you elite or otherwise. We've played against backups that look like allstars against us. Reimer played great tonight, that doesn't make him an elite goalie.
Don't forget Lu had a good save percentage tonight and was the second star. Guess he should have gotten a shutout.