Coaching is tricky one because it is very situational dependent, and a guy who might look good somewhere comes in a doesn't get results so is judged as 'bad', while a guy taht just wasn't getting it done suddenly jags a Cup and is a 'good' coach when all they did was catch lightning in a bottle for a season.
I'm certainly not saying we need to keep Lavi as he's the 'answer', but on what are we basing the idea that some other guy is going to come in and turn things around?
We need Torts? We're already bitching about the mental fragility of this team, and he's a guy who hasn't managed to get a team to the Conference Finals since 11-12 (and we know how that turned out).
Winnipeg is playing well, would we have liked the hire of Arniel after his associate stint here and lack of head coaching experience?
Maurice went 17 seasons between Conference Final trips. There's no way we would have accepted his hire after he went TOR/CAR/WPG with absolutely nothing to show for it.
Get a guy Like Rod the Bod who they have to respect? Cool, he hasn't got it done with a Canes roster at least as talented as ours.
Coaching matters, but it's also a crap-shoot. Changing the coach and/or the playing style doesn't change the fact that this team is a mish-mash of parts that don't fit together properly