Post-Game Talk: GAME 19: Canucks 1, Rangers 2: Point streak over! Ice bags brought out.

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

Steely Van

Registered User
Oct 12, 2018
438
276
Pouliot is the next Bobby Orr. In the last year I have enjoyed watching him make meaningless rushes that result in Boeser covering for him on defense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VancouverJagger

Orca Smash

Registered User
Feb 9, 2012
13,953
2,216
Green's uninhibited love for Pouliot is bewildering. He's quick to staple Goldy, yet Pouliot gets chance after chance despite gaffe after gaffe.

He's clearly a terrible PP QB. Yet he's the only guy who gets thrown out there. It's just wild.

It is the same thing we see with to many coaches who fall in love with someone they coached in the minors and cant look past it, pouilot is his linden vey. Undeserved opportunities.
 

geebaan

7th round busted
Oct 27, 2012
10,369
9,064
It is the same thing we see with to many coaches who fall in love with someone they coached in the minors and cant look past it, pouilot is his linden vey. Undeserved opportunities.

Yea I hate it too but it’s not uncommon, and in fact, quite common. It’s the loving of grinder players by Green I don’t get.
 

Get North

Registered User
Aug 25, 2013
8,472
1,364
B.C.
it's a weird statement to make since there's a bunch of dog **** passengers on literally every cup winning team.

do you really think the 2017 penguins don't win the cup if they replace carter rowney with granlund or goldobin
Yeah I do. From the beginning of the season, if they had Granlund or Goldobin instead of Rowney, they probably lose a couple games or miss out on points. Rowney kills penalties, he's a good face-off guy.

Goldobin almost cost us a goal this game because of his terrible hockey IQ, Granlund is a passenger and did nothing at all, his face-off % sucks as well. I know they play more than Rowney, but in the same role as the Penguins, Rowney would be better and probably wouldn't cost a goal a game like Goldobin.
 

Lupuls Grit

Registered User
Oct 12, 2018
702
536
Orillia
If Boeser was healthy, I would scratch Goldobin. I enjoy watching his creativity but as a coach there is no way I want that guy in the line-up with his turnovers and erratic play. He simply doesn't produce enough to justify his spot. That said, with no Boeser, they need him in there. And what the hell is going on with Gudbranson. He actually looks.... good???
 

Melvin

21/12/05
Sep 29, 2017
15,207
28,114
Vancouver, BC
Reminder: Derrick Pouliot is an offensive defenseman PP specialist who is on pace for 13 points over 82 games while leading the team in PP time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: timw33

MS

1%er
Mar 18, 2002
55,206
89,884
Vancouver, BC
Team didn't play that badly but puck luck has dried up and a few individual performances were awful.

- Goldobin was absolutely terrible in the first, then had two shifts where he scored and almost scored, then went back to being absolutely terrible. Despite scoring that was his worst game of the season and a brutal showing. Puck management was atrocious, defensive play poor, two lazy penalties.

- Pouliot is garbage. What a terrible performance. Did everything wrong with the puck on his stick tonight. Level of precision in his play about what you'd expect of a player who was drunk. That he's still on the top PP unit is insanity. Defensively he's always been terrible and this is no change. Contributes absolutely nothing to this team aside from wasting Tanev on babysitting duty.

- Virtanen is both playing well and hindering Pettersson and his line. Has skated very well in the last two games and is doing a lot of good things, but he's just a terrible match for Pettersson. Much better fit with Horvat or Sutter when he returns.

- Hutton and Gudbranson were solid but using Gudbranson as a sheltered offensive defender only playing with the Pettersson line is not a good idea. Not surprising that Pettersson's scoring has dried up when 2 of the 4 players on the ice with him are always two guys with the hockey sense of Virtanen and Gudbranson.

- Horvat continued to chew through tough minutes but wasn't nearly as dangerous offensively tonight. Roussel contributed little on his wing.

- Granlund went back to old Granlund tonight. Less committed skating and a lazy icing call that cost the team the winning goal.

- Schaller sucks.

- Markstrom very good again. Giving the team a chance to win every night.
 

Bertuzzzi44

Registered User
Jun 26, 2018
3,983
3,767
Pouliot out on the 6 on 4 lol. “Canucks battle hard and gain possession, they set up, back to Pouliot he shoots easily blocked and the puck clears the zone...” why was he out there? Stecher, Hutton, Tanev heck even Gudbranson and Del Zotto are better options.
 

Svencouver

Registered User
Apr 8, 2015
5,461
10,673
Vancouver
Good:
Virtanen: With a caveat, in that I think he's a poor fit for Pettersson. He's playing well on the boards, checking almost better than everyone else on the team, and is looking like a totally different player than the defensive gaffe-meister from a couple of seasons ago. I'd say he needs to work on his O zone play, though. Hes disporportionately more effective when hes checking or on the rush. He isn't great at getting into good spots to score and doesn't make great passes when we have control on the cycle. He's been playing net front for a couple years, though, so hopefully green gives him some more opportunities to work on that.

Markstrom: Always gives up one juicy rebound right in the slot each game, but other than that he's looking consistently better than last year. Is being let down by one of the leagues worst defenses. Most of the shots he gets scored on are pretty unsaveable.

Pettersson: Is doing pretty well given he has like 3-4 guys collapsing in on him constantly since nobody else on his line is really a threat. Isn't getting a ton of space to operate and seems kinda reluctant to pass.

Hutton: Looks like our best D man at times. Is the only consistent offensive catalyst on the blue line and is respectable defensively as well. His combination of physicality and quickness makes him an eye-catcher in a good way, even if he isn't the most physical or the quickest.

Meh:

Pretty much the rest of the team. Just looked consistently outclassed in every aspect tonight, really, and stayed pretty quiet throughout. NYR played our game better than we did - outspending us and playing aggressive on D. Really shut down a lot of our offense.

Gaudette: Kinda looking like a tweener. Could be good and has flashed but is just way too raw, inexperienced, and easy to knock off the puck. Looks unsuited to the NHL game atm. One of those players that you look at and don't see anything wrong with, but just doesn't make things happen on the scoresheet. Needs more time in the A.

Gudbranson: Looking solid. Needs to play a simple game of defensive responsibility, using his size, and putting shots on net to succeed. Hopefully he can keep doing that. That simple game will result in quiet nights like tonight, but that's better than having a night like Pouliot.

Horvat: Desperately needs help on the wings. Should be one of our biggest priorities going forward. Always one step ahead of everyone hes playing with atm, both literally and figuratively. Solid but he can't do everything by himself. Would love to see someone like Stone on his line.

Bad:

Do I even have to say it? It's Pouliot. Pouliot sucks and Green needs to get it through is head already that he sucks. Just our worst player in every aspect in every game he's played going back to preseason. Evident that the only reason he's still in the lineup is because they want to take their time with Juolevi but every game is making it harder for me to maintain that patience. Juolevi, despite his faults, is everything that Pouliot isn't. A Solid PPQB most importantly. Our PP is going to look horrendous as long as he's leading it.

Green: Stop making Pouliot the centerpiece of this team. He's on the first pairing and the PP1. He isn't good enough for either of those positions. Shelter him on the 3rd pairing until we either get Edler back or call Juolevi up.

Goldobin: Frustrating but Im still happy with his development. Our second most skilled forward offensively, while probably one of our worst players defensively. Hell figure it out, I hope.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarrenX

Zombotron

Supreme Overlord of Crap
Jan 3, 2010
18,358
9,927
Toronto
Out of the Beagle-Roussel-Schaller trio of FA signings, I wasn't expecting to say I would like Schaller the least
 

Canuckle1970

Registered User
Mar 24, 2010
7,149
6,303
I know there's a lot of anger and frustration with Pouliot, but we have to step back and look at this.

Green, and management, have to see what they've got. They're consistently playing Pouliot on the pp to see if they have a future pp qb to compliment Hughes. He may improve and run with it, or he may get even worse.

I think they know what they have with Edler, Tanev, Guds, Stecher, and Hutton, but Pouliot is still a question mark.
 

Bleach Clean

Registered User
Aug 9, 2006
27,454
7,151
- Virtanen is both playing well and hindering Pettersson and his line. Has skated very well in the last two games and is doing a lot of good things, but he's just a terrible match for Pettersson. Much better fit with Horvat or Sutter when he returns.

- Hutton and Gudbranson were solid but using Gudbranson as a sheltered offensive defender only playing with the Pettersson line is not a good idea. Not surprising that Pettersson's scoring has dried up when 2 of the 4 players on the ice with him are always two guys with the hockey sense of Virtanen and Gudbranson.

- Granlund went back to old Granlund tonight. Less committed skating and a lazy icing call that cost the team the winning goal.

- Markstrom very good again. Giving the team a chance to win every night.


Agreed, Goldobin and Pouliot had bad games. Pouliot, especially, is just well past any potential use. The risk is no longer worth the reward. At least with Hutton, even when he was "struggling", he could play the game at evens. Pouliot can't.

A few comments:

- Pettersson and Virtanen was unlikely to work. Opposing play styles. Glad they tried it, but time to move on.

- I hate the fact that Gudbranson is paired with Pettersson. I've seen it before with the Sedins sheltering poor defensive pairings. Enough. Put the best players together and let them go. Stop trying to coach scared and continue coaching to win.

- Granlund had an off night, but he's been value on the year. Treating this one as a one off because he's earned the benefit of the doubt.

- Markstrom has been good on the year. His numbers aren't there, but he's been good. He is a legit #1 to me. Goaltending has not been a major question mark this year, or for a while IMO.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: DarrenX

vanarchy

May 3, 2013
9,268
8,711
I know there's a lot of anger and frustration with Pouliot, but we have to step back and look at this.

Green, and management, have to see what they've got. They're consistently playing Pouliot on the pp to see if they have a future pp qb to compliment Hughes. He may improve and run with it, or he may get even worse.

I think they know what they have with Edler, Tanev, Guds, Stecher, and Hutton, but Pouliot is still a question mark.
I think it's apparent what we have with Pouliot. It's just a question of when that is going to sink in to the big guns upstairs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: THE Green Man

Intangibos

High-End Intangibos
Apr 5, 2010
7,835
3,429
Burnaby
Gaudette should be developing in the AHL.

I know there's a lot of anger and frustration with Pouliot, but we have to step back and look at this.

Green, and management, have to see what they've got. They're consistently playing Pouliot on the pp to see if they have a future pp qb to compliment Hughes. He may improve and run with it, or he may get even worse.

I think they know what they have with Edler, Tanev, Guds, Stecher, and Hutton, but Pouliot is still a question mark.

The only question mark in regards to Pouliot is the one floating above my head when I watch him attempt to play hockey.

Terrible player. No upside. Get rid of him.
 

Motte and Bailey

Registered User
Jun 21, 2017
3,692
1,557
Of course holding everything else the same you'd prefer the small advantage of being better on faceoffs.

But the difference between being a good faceoff team and a bad faceoff team is 1-2 possession changes/game in a sport that features literally hundreds of possession changes every game.

To prioritize that tiny metric over getting in players who are actually better at playing hockey or to spend huge UFA premiums on bottom-roster players just for their faceoff ability is terrible management.

I don't think it's a tiny metric at all. A coach needs to have as many weapons and as many better weapons than other coaches as possible. If you're getting into a knife fight and the other guy has a butter knife you'd rather have a machete because it's gives you a huge advantage. If your knife aka your best face-off guy is Manny Malhotra or Jay Beagle then you've got a machete and if your best faceoff guy is Jared McCann or Henrik Sedin last year (I'm sorry Henrik) you have a butter knife. If you're not giving your coach the best weapons you can for each situation you're not doing your job as a team builder.

Let me ask you this, you at least believe that Malholtra's ability to win faceoffs and defend/PK was significant right?
 

Ainec

Panetta was not racist
Jun 20, 2009
21,784
6,430
core players:
horvat
pettersson
boeser

semi-core:
hutton
edler
tanev

when you only have this much, the magnifying glass on depth players is large. No surprise th
 

Josepho

i want the bartkowski thread back
Jan 1, 2015
14,959
8,641
British Columbia
I don't think it's a tiny metric at all. A coach needs to have as many weapons and as many better weapons than other coaches as possible. If you're getting into a knife fight and the other guy has a butter knife you'd rather have a machete because it's gives you a huge advantage. If your knife aka your best face-off guy is Manny Malhotra or Jay Beagle then you've got a machete and if your best faceoff guy is Jared McCann or Henrik Sedin last year (I'm sorry Henrik) you have a butter knife. If you're not giving your coach the best weapons you can for each situation you're not doing your job as a team builder.

Let me ask you this, you at least believe that Malholtra's ability to win faceoffs and defend/PK was significant right?

the difference between 2/3 faceoffs every game is not the same as the difference between a machete and a butter knife

jesus christ
 
  • Like
Reactions: PM

Motte and Bailey

Registered User
Jun 21, 2017
3,692
1,557
the difference between 2/3 faceoffs every game is not the same as the difference between a machete and a butter knife

jesus christ

Plays happen one at a time and yes in a key situation the difference between having prime Malhotra facing off against last year's (injured?) Henrik is the difference between a butter knife and a machete.
 

Intangibos

High-End Intangibos
Apr 5, 2010
7,835
3,429
Burnaby
I don't think it's a tiny metric at all. A coach needs to have as many weapons and as many better weapons than other coaches as possible. If you're getting into a knife fight and the other guy has a butter knife you'd rather have a machete because it's gives you a huge advantage. If your knife aka your best face-off guy is Manny Malhotra or Jay Beagle then you've got a machete and if your best faceoff guy is Jared McCann or Henrik Sedin last year (I'm sorry Henrik) you have a butter knife. If you're not giving your coach the best weapons you can for each situation you're not doing your job as a team builder.

Let me ask you this, you at least believe that Malholtra's ability to win faceoffs and defend/PK was significant right?

Reminder that the reason faceoffs matter is to have the puck more. Malhotra was excellent at not getting scored on. Malhotra was excellent on the PK. When Malhotra's line had the puck Malhotra's line kept the puck.
 

Canuckle1970

Registered User
Mar 24, 2010
7,149
6,303
I think I'd be a little less po'd with the loss if EP had just scored a goal. Things should be better at home when we can get the line-up matches we want.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad