Lonny Bohonos
Registered User
It's held both players back IMO. They could be better than they are if they just understood this.
Agreed. Its like they lose focus sometimes and then exacerbate it by focusing on tit-for-tatting and the like.
It's held both players back IMO. They could be better than they are if they just understood this.
You could dispute it by claiming that St. Louis simply had better finish when it counted tonight, for one thing.
You could also dispute it by saying that despite outplaying them, the break-downs we had in our own end were far more problematic than the ones that they had.
I didn't think Luongo looked too awful on any of the goals tonight. Well, maybe that first shootout goal.
Luongo himself admitted the first two goals were on him. The 3rd went of Berglund apparently.
I agree with DTS here.
You could dispute it by claiming that St. Louis simply had better finish when it counted tonight, for one thing.
You could also dispute it by saying that despite outplaying them, the break-downs we had in our own end were far more problematic than the ones that they had.
I didn't think Luongo looked too awful on any of the goals tonight. Well, maybe that first shootout goal.
Luongo tonight wasn't nearly as soft as Schneider the other night I'd roll with him.
The 3rd goal he never should have been in the butterfly at that time, if he were positioned correctly that doesn't have any chance of going in.
I know. He was still down early and left room on the short side. Saying that, the deflection probably makes it the goal I'm least concerned about. The first two seem far worse.
Well I don't buy it. I had scoring chances 23-8 in favour of Vancouver. We had much higher quality opportunities and Allen made big saves to keep his team in it.
The only question I have is, why can't AV figure out how to improve this teams 2nd periods? We've been dreadful in 2nd periods for a very long time IIRC...
Surprised more people haven't commented on Garrison. I thought he looked head and shoulders better than most his outings thus far. Hopefully this is a sign of things to come.
Sedin Sedin Burrows
Raymond Kesler Hansen
Higgins Schroeder Kassian
Weise Lapierre Volpatti
Is this what we see in Chicago?
The 3rd goal he never should have been in the butterfly at that time, if he were positioned correctly that doesn't have any chance of going in.
The only question I have is, why can't AV figure out how to improve this teams 2nd periods? We've been dreadful in 2nd periods for a very long time IIRC...
Surprised more people haven't commented on Garrison. I thought he looked head and shoulders better than most his outings thus far. Hopefully this is a sign of things to come.
Sedin Sedin Burrows
Raymond Kesler Hansen
Higgins Schroeder Kassian
Weise Lapierre Volpatti
Is this what we see in Chicago?
The second line needs a shake-up. Kassian has been a defensive blunder (two GA on him now), and I don't know what Weise was doing up there tonight. If Booth is back, I'd say role Higgins/Kesler/Booth and keep the third line intact. Otherwise, we need someone better than Kass/Weise on Kesler's wing (bump up Hansen, Raymond, etc.).
The only question I have is, why can't AV figure out how to improve this teams 2nd periods? We've been dreadful in 2nd periods for a very long time IIRC...
Someone noted that the Canucks have shorter shifts than most teams and that puts them at a disadvantage during periods where they have the long change. If that's really the case, AV should adjust his tactics.
Someone noted that the Canucks have shorter shifts than most teams and that puts them at a disadvantage during periods where they have the long change. If that's really the case, AV should adjust his tactics.