Post-Game Talk: GAME 10 - What was that? - Flyers 2 BRUINS 0

xStanleyCupsFor

Registered User
Sep 12, 2014
1,845
1,373

BiteThisBurrows

Registered User
Feb 11, 2022
1,235
2,626
What is he talking about? What game plan? Does he use a different one every game?

Has he tried the start on time, skate hard, support the puck, hit their D, crash the net, and shoot shoot shoot plan yet?
I guess he's saying he was outcoached by Torts, but I didn't see the Bruins doing anything radically different than any other night.
 

xStanleyCupsFor

Registered User
Sep 12, 2014
1,845
1,373
So what do we do? Bring in a bottom pair defenseman for $5mil...That's not Zadorov's fault BTW, and I don't blame him. It was just such an unnecessary signing...Been saying it all summer.
I like Zadorov. He's been fine. He hits, he shoots, he clears the crease, and for a big guy he doesn't handle the puck like a grenade. However, he's a luxury. The Bruins essentially needed two wingers instead, one to replace Debrusk, and one to replace Marchand. They realistically have 2 legit top 6 players right now, who aren't even playing to their potential. Pasta and Lindholm. Forget waiting for Zacha, Coyle, Frederic, Geekie to become something they're not. Poitras is still young and developing, can't rely on him yet.
 

PlayMakers

Registered User
Aug 9, 2004
25,688
27,077
Medfield, MA
That was gross to watch.

Nobody cared. Half-speed all game. 1 shot in the 3rd period when you're down a goal. Who had more careless giveaways, Marchand or McAvoy?

Pasta was listless. H.Lindholm, throwing pucks into sticks and guys on their knees. Power play gave up more chances than they created.

They've lost by more in recent years, got blown out at times, but I can't recall seeing a game where they looked like they couldn't care less. That was shocking.
 

Carl Hungus

Registered User
Apr 20, 2022
748
2,678
I just don't get how these guys can show that they have what it takes against toronto, then come out like this

4-5 coming into the night and show up flat. Don't know what there is to say about that. Not entitled to wins and not entitled to coast to a win, not even against a bad flyers team. Now they're last in the atlantic after 10 games
 

bobbyorr04

Bruins fan 4ever
Sponsor
Apr 12, 2011
13,958
22,248
BeavisNeverScored.jpg
"Here lies Jim Montgomery ...for not having the right game plan"
What is he talking about? What game plan? Does he use a different one every game?

Has he tried the start on time, skate hard, support the puck, hit their D, crash the net, and shoot shoot shoot plan yet?
I don't think Monty has ever heard of the things you speak of
 

Sevendust

Registered User
Jan 11, 2010
1,806
2,356
Munich, Germany
Korpisalo's best game by far. That's the positive. The team has become too complacent. They need something to shake them up. What's planned for Frederic? Everyone is willing to give him the 4 year x 4 million contract he will probably want to get? That's not me. He's a passenger too often and just goes along with it. He won't be worth the next contract he likely gets. Pack him with Lysell and try to get a top-six right winger.
 

The Hockey Tonk Man

Registered User
May 3, 2007
4,353
4,394
Toronto
I like Zadorov. He's been fine. He hits, he shoots, he clears the crease, and for a big guy he doesn't handle the puck like a grenade. However, he's a luxury. The Bruins essentially needed two wingers instead, one to replace Debrusk, and one to replace Marchand. They realistically have 2 legit top 6 players right now, who aren't even playing to their potential. Pasta and Lindholm. Forget waiting for Zacha, Coyle, Frederic, Geekie to become something they're not. Poitras is still young and developing, can't rely on him yet.
I was going to try to rank the players by tier earlier then I got sad hah.
But you pretty much nailed it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RiverbottomChuck

weaponomega

Registered User
Feb 9, 2004
10,876
2,350
Calgary, Alberta
I was in the too soon to think about replacing Monty, but after a performance like that I think it's time to start thinking about it. That was pathetic, embarrassing and a joke.

There isn't a single thing working with the team right now. Offensively they are bad, defensive are improving but not great. Special teams are awful. Where is the positives to take.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gordoff

Gordoff

Formerly: Strafer
Jan 18, 2003
26,196
27,550
The Hub
I missed this one, on vacation in Las Vegas, but:

I think Sweeneely KNOWS that they'd better fire Monty ASAP or it will doom their season and ability to dig out of this MESS. The time to do something is NOW.
Monty knows he's a dead coach walking. He's coaching like he knows that
he's pretty much finished behind the B's bench.
If Monty isn't replaced with a real, established, accomplished NHL now there will be no tomorrow (playoffs).
If there are no playoffs, Sweeney will be hard-pressed to keep his job.
Jacobs will not accept mediocrity or not making the playoffs.
IMO Sad Sack Sacco isn't the answer and they know it.
Not sure what Leach's style is but if he can't coach a north/south offense that
can dump & chase, and pound the opposition's defensemen then he may not be the answer.

I'd like to see Mike Sullivan back behind the bench but doubt that happens.
I'm not certain if Gerard Gallant is the kind of guy Sweeney would hire because he's a coach who doesn't appear to cower to a suit like Sweeney.
Sweeney gave the well-tailored Cassidy the job in place of Claude and then moved on to Montgomery knowing that he'd be easy to control because he gave him the opportunity to redeem his career.
Sweeney can't screw around and simply hand the job to the good ol' boys ju dour, he needs to be bold and get an accomplished, experienced coach or HE could be shown the door this off-season.
He had better not blow it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PatriceBergeronFan

Blitzkrug

Registered User
Sep 17, 2013
27,095
8,805
Winnipeg
Montgomery was touted as a guy who was able to
I missed this one, on vacation in Las Vegas, but:

I think Sweeneely KNOWS that they'd better fire Monty ASAP or it will doom their season and ability to dig out of this MESS. The time to do something is NOW.
Monty knows he's a dead coach walking. He's coaching like he knows that
he's pretty much finished behind the B's bench.
If Monty isn't replaced with a real, established, accomplished NHL now there will be no tomorrow (playoffs).
If there are no playoffs, Sweeney will be hard-pressed to keep his job.
Jacobs will not accept mediocrity or not making the playoffs.
IMO Sad Sack Sacco isn't the answer and they know it.
Not sure what Leach's style is but if he can't coach a north/south offense that
can dump & chase, and pound the opposition's defensemen then he may not be the answer.

I'd like to see Mike Sullivan back behind the bench but doubt that happens.
I'm not certain if Gerard Gallant is the kind of guy Sweeney would hire because he's a coach who doesn't appear to cower to a suit like Sweeney.
Sweeney gave the well-tailored Cassidy the job in place of Claude and then moved on to Montgomery knowing that he'd be easy to control because he gave him the opportunity to redeem his career.
Sweeney can't screw around and simply hand the job to the good ol' boys ju dour, he needs to be bold and get an accomplished, experienced coach or HE could be shown the door this off-season.
He had better not blow it.
Montgomery redeemed his career as an assistant in St. Louis. Players had nothing but good things to say about him.

I would argue the career didn't need much redeeming to start with. Everyone knew he could coach from his time in Dallas, it was just his personal demons that were dragging him down rather than coaching acumen.
 

DaStinger

Permanent Interim
Feb 14, 2007
4,978
1,479
NB, Canada
The Bs' brass considered this to be a lineup that would push hard for the cup, but not with this lack of inspiration and emotion.

Honestly, I don't see them keeping Monty around if they lose the next one...especially being in the last year of his contract.
Remember the extension talks before the season started... crickets now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: badbrewin

Jorgolyte

Registered User
Jun 9, 2024
16
30
Offensively, its awful. Even on paper.

Have you seen our wingers? Pastrnak, a 37yr old Marchand coming off of multiple surgeries and who? Zacha?

I don't care who the coach is, you aren't going to find a magic line combination out of that group.
Exactly. Why do people keep saying its a strong forward group? They are AT LEAST 3 shy of top 6 caliber players. And I like him but to expect EL to come in here and suddenly be a top C is just ridiculous.
 

Aeroforce

Registered User
Apr 28, 2012
3,497
5,832
Houston, TX
It was a dull game, but the most glaring issue is the B's complete lack of finish. They certainly have issues, but as Brickley stated, there were instances in which they did everything right, except score.

Sure, blocking shots is a trademark of Tortorella-coached teams. But they made Ersson look like Patrick Roy.

Marchand's shot either misses the net or floats into the logo on the goalie's jersey. Pastrnak passes when he should shoot, and shoots he should pass. And it's hard to say Zacha is snake-bitten; his shots have just been poor.
 

caz16

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jun 11, 2011
7,737
17,641
Ontario
That was ugly, poor Korpi, had a good game and got nothing to show for it. The PP drives me crazy, I think they have been the worst in the league for being offside and icing the puck while on the power play. It is absolutely ridiculous. Embarrassing.

I don't know what the answer is but heads are going to roll soon.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad