Carolina
Registered User
- Oct 26, 2012
- 168
- 1
The reason he "sat there like a stone" was that he had (foolishly) assumed that Corvo was going to have some kind of role in the play, and therefore hadn't moved out to challenge the shooter. When Lupul skated right around the defender in a split-second, Peters had no chance at getting into proper position to play it as a 1-on-1 situation.
Being that far back in his crease, and having no chance at a poke check, he did the only thing he COULD do and dropped to deny an initial shot. Lupul, having all the time and space in the world AND his own choice of speed AND being on his forehand, did the smart thing and cut across the crease NHL94-style to the wide-open, undefended, gaping net on the far side. Peters made a token attempt at kicking his pad out, but at that point the play was all but over.
There's a reason that penalty shots begin from a standstill at center ice. Giving a player 200 feet of momentum and having the goalie stand flat-footed till the puck is at the faceoff circle is all but a guaranteed goal. The idea that Peters "should" make that stop and that every other NHL goalie would have, I'm sorry, but that's completely ridiculous. The one goalie who was ever good at that kind of stop was Hasek, and that's because he had that ridiculous roll-over blocker save going for him.
I'll take your word for it that the goal wasn't as bad as it looked. It just looked to me that Peters could have done more. It doesn't matter now anyway. Most teams aren't going to win many games with both their goalies out, especially when you already have a terrible defense.