Friedman- Players hate going to cold weather cities for ASG, NHL possibly reducing the eligible host cities

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
I'm shocked that guys who spend the season on a plane and in hotels would want to go to a warm weather city, like the majority of players not participating in the ASG, during the break.
 
I dont blame the players at all. The season is a grind. They get to the all star break, and the best players get rewarded with a trip to the all star game, where they have to participate in cringe worthy exhibitions. Meanwhile their teammates are posting tik toks and shit from 5 star resorts. I'd be pissed too.

Imagine you work for a company. That company says...okay everyone, in February we are shutting down for a week. A select few of you who have killed it over the past year have to come to a city of our choosing to be celebrated by putting in some extra work. You may get a chance to win something really f***ing cool like Chipotle for a year. The rest of you losers get to do whatever you want.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Saskatoon
Funny that there was recently press that the most elite NHL stars are embarrassed and upset by their $10-12m annual salaries compared to other major sports. You want to grow the game and you are the face of the league but you complain about going to a cold weather city for an all star game? Moving the ASG around is a chance to promote hockey in each local market and engage people who are not already fans.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9911 and surixon
Life teaches us a lot of lessons and one I learned was not to be too tough on Lindros for that decision.

People on here talk a lot about old school boomers like me being stuck in the past. Probably THE biggest boomer trait that never seems to get questioned (because it is still supported by younger people) is expecting a player to go where he is drafted 100% of the time.

I have one daughter who is very accomplished track athlete. She was recruited by many colleges, especially in the northwest US (colleges in Washington, Orgeon, California, North Dakota and Montana).

We visited a bunch of those schools and listened to their offers. Some were throwing out crazy amounts in scholarships, numbers we couldn't believe.

Ultimately, she did not want to move that far away from Saskatchewan, our home. Portland and Seattle really scared her, frankly. So she took a deal in a Canadian university which financially was worth about 1/10th of what she was being offered in the US.

I wonder what she would have felt as an 18 year old if, for example, the University of Portland just got to choose her and she was expected to go there. I know there is a difference between pro athletes and amateur, but I am sure she would not have gone there, nor would we have wanted her to.

That's why I look at that whole Lindros thing a bit differently now that I am older and have seen the athlete's side.

Absolutely. The draft system isn't fair for the players involved. However, it is a system you voluntarily become a part of. You don't have to play in the NHL. Lindros, or any other player, is free to do as they choose though. You want to hold out on the team that drafted you, you want to leave this team to go to this other team in free agency, you want to force a trade to somewhere specific, all's fair in love and war. It's a business.

Lindros wasn't the first, but he might've been the first to truly stick to his guns. At the very least, the biggest name to do so. He said, I'm not playing there, and sat out an entire year to prove it. A stark example of, the top players have a lot of sway. Collectively, they tend not to beat the owners, but individually, you're at the mercy of top talent. It's why stupid contracts are still handed out every year. Despite years of evidence that you shouldn't do it, despite the hard cap, it still happens every year(also partly due to that if you don't do it, players yell collusion, and there's a whole new set of problems to deal with). Lindros was a bit of a revolutionary in that regard, and helped pave the way for player empowerment.
 
ASG is super lame, cringey, and quite frankly, pathetic. Get rid off it. Replace with a meaningful/long-term plan for a bi-annual competitive INTL tournament or something like that.
 
There are people who like the ASG and those that don't. I can't think of anything they could do to bridge the gap between the two. The truth is, basketball and baseball face the same issue (the Pro Bowl always sucked). There's no novelty to it anymore. 20+ years ago, you tuned in because you got to see players you wouldn't normally see. Most fans had access to the games in their own market and that was about it. Today, it's an ubiquitous game. I can stay up late and watch 82 Oiler games if I want, so what do I care if McDavid is playing a scrimmage game? As I said, I don't think there's any solution. Honestly, by the first weekend in February, it's more appealing to spend a Saturday doing something different than watching hockey. Likely an impossibility and probably even less appealing to players, but maybe replace it with a summer fan fest the first weekend of August. At least then it'd be a break from the monotony of summer instead of trying to sell more hockey - except this time it's meaningless! - in February. Or leave it as the corporate schmooze fest it is, and let the kids in the host market enjoy it.
 
The prima donna attitude of some players makes me less interested in watching hockey. Like, okay you want to be this superstar and insult the average fan who spends their hard earned money supporting your luxurious lifestyle? Fine. Congratulations. You've earned my contempt.
Players have a limited amount of time to secure the bag to set them and their families up for financial success. And what gain is their to playing in the ASG? Like sure play in 1 or 2 but then skip the competition get some rest soo you can make more funds.

The ASG doesn't really offer much for players and they play half assed while their teammates get a short vacation.

So yeah I don't blame players for prioritizing their careers over a meaningless game.
 
Michael Scott had no problem coming to Winnipeg in November. Even hooked up with blonde female concierge during his business trip. If it's good enough for him, it should be good enough for the NHL players.:sarcasm:
 
Players are people. Imagine if your coworkers all got 5 extra vacations days and your boss said "You're doing such a good job for us instead of extra vacation we're bringing you on a work trip to Winnipeg in February. It doesn't pay extra, if you say no we're docking your pay and you have to smile the whole time or, you guessed it, we're docking your pay."
 
Absolutely. The draft system isn't fair for the players involved. However, it is a system you voluntarily become a part of. You don't have to play in the NHL. Lindros, or any other player, is free to do as they choose though. You want to hold out on the team that drafted you, you want to leave this team to go to this other team in free agency, you want to force a trade to somewhere specific, all's fair in love and war. It's a business.

Lindros wasn't the first, but he might've been the first to truly stick to his guns. At the very least, the biggest name to do so. He said, I'm not playing there, and sat out an entire year to prove it. A stark example of, the top players have a lot of sway. Collectively, they tend not to beat the owners, but individually, you're at the mercy of top talent. It's why stupid contracts are still handed out every year. Despite years of evidence that you shouldn't do it, despite the hard cap, it still happens every year(also partly due to that if you don't do it, players yell collusion, and there's a whole new set of problems to deal with). Lindros was a bit of a revolutionary in that regard, and helped pave the way for player empowerment.

Absolutely. Lindros was arguably the biggest first overall pick in hockey history at that point (Crosby probably had close to as much hype, McDavid had less but a lot).

As someone who has been lucky enough to know a few NHL players, one thing people don't quite fully understand is how small the window is for most of them. We always think of the big name signings, but some of these guys have five years to make a lifetime of earnings. Yes, they can do other things after, but that's why they try to get every nickel and the best possible situation they can, while they can. One guy I know had two NHL games (didn't play in one). He thought when he was called up he had made it. Then he got sent back down and never made it back.
 
It’s an outdated concept so I don’t doubt they’d rather not do it. They probably want the warm weather so their families can join them and enjoy the area. The game is a demonstration of the lack of modern thinking. if they want to sell the game they need to start with the basics of the modern world and makes games available on streaming services. That’ll do far more for the game.
 
Michael Scott had no problem coming to Winnipeg in November. Even hooked up with blonde female concierge during his business trip. If it's good enough for him, it should be good enough for the NHL players.:sarcasm:

Man is a legend. Spent his per diem on a sweater? 4D chess right there
 
Maybe its me but if you want to make the all Star weekend better do the following

1. The all star MVP team gets 4 extra pts.

2. All players at the all star game get a week off mandatory after the game.

3. All players get at least 50k and each player on the roster gets an additional 50k if their team wins the all star game.
 
According to Friedman there has been an overwhelming response from NHL players that they dislike participating in the All-Star game weekend festivities and commitment. NHL teams have expressed that it is becoming increasingly harder and harder to get their players to want to go to the ASG.

The NHL met with All-Stars yesterday to try and come up with a solution on how to entice players to the event.

Friedman says that the overwhelming response is that players only want the ASG to be in hot weather/family ideal locations.

Friedman says that the NHL really took this to heart and are thinking of limiting the ASG to a circuit of a few cities, (Ala Superbowl)

Friedman mentions that the cities would be places such as , Florida, Tampa, Dallas, Arizona, Caliornia teams, Westocast.

Easy fix, remove the guaranteed pays. Distribute the salaries evenely. Meaning everyone makes the same salary, you play you earn money, you dont play you dont earn money. Bonus cash for perfomances of the night.

Problem solved.

Its only my 2 cents but i don't think the majority of hockey players agree with the fruity direction the NHL is heading towards. I think they dont have a choice but I dont believe they like it to much being associated with it, specially the euro players.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: TheNeutralPresident
Easy fix, remove the guaranteed pays. Distribute the salaries evenely. Meaning everyone makes the same salary, you play you earn money, you dont play you dont earn money. Bonus cash for perfomances of the night.

Problem solved.

Its only my 2 cents but i don't think the majority of hockey players agree with the fruity direction the NHL is heading towards. I think they dont have a choice but I dont believe they like it to much being associated with it, specially the euro players.
lol what
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad