Speculation: Free Agency Thread

bleedblue1223

Registered User
Jan 21, 2011
52,916
16,355
Perron - Stastny - Fabbri would be interesting.

If he'd take $10m over 3 years, he'd be worth the risk.

Right, that's my thinking. I'd rather sign Perron than have a trade where Tatar/Nyquist types are the main piece for Shattenkirk.
 

Blanick

Winter is coming
Sponsor
Sep 20, 2011
16,366
11,607
St. Louis
Isn't Perron another LW though? Can he play both sides?

I think I would rather have Backes back and then shift Fabbri to the middle.

Schwartz - Stastny - Backes
Steen - Fabbri - Tarasenko
Berglund - Sobotka - Jaskin
Upshall - Brodziak - Reaves/Depth guy
 

bleedblue1223

Registered User
Jan 21, 2011
52,916
16,355
Isn't Perron another LW though? Can he play both sides?

I think I would rather have Backes back and then shift Fabbri to the middle.

Schwartz - Stastny - Backes
Steen - Fabbri - Tarasenko
Berglund - Sobotka - Jaskin
Upshall - Brodziak - Reaves/Depth guy

He played both after he left here.
 

Falco Lombardi

Registered User
Nov 17, 2011
23,195
8,499
St. Louis, MO
Isn't Perron another LW though? Can he play both sides?

I think I would rather have Backes back and then shift Fabbri to the middle.

Schwartz - Stastny - Backes
Steen - Fabbri - Tarasenko
Berglund - Sobotka - Jaskin
Upshall - Brodziak - Reaves/Depth guy

This is much more preferable
 

bleedblue1223

Registered User
Jan 21, 2011
52,916
16,355
If we sign Perron, I think that either indicates we have another move with significant money or we are preparing to keep Shattenkirk. That's a short-term issue in keeping Shattenkirk this season, it means we lose out on a bigger signing. Signing Schwartz and Backes/UFA to big deals was all under the basic assumption that Shattenkirk was traded, and that might not happen now.
 

bleedblue1223

Registered User
Jan 21, 2011
52,916
16,355
Ok wasn't sure. Either way I would rather have Backes big body and PK/PP ability though.

Of course, but one is $6 million and the other is under $4, so I don't think it's a direct either or. I think if Army isn't trading Shattenkirk, a $6 million player in addition to Schwartz is likely out of the question.
 

bleedblue1223

Registered User
Jan 21, 2011
52,916
16,355
Schwartz+Sobotka+backup goalie = ~10.5-11. We can't afford Backes. Army is going to really screw this offseason up.
 

Falco Lombardi

Registered User
Nov 17, 2011
23,195
8,499
St. Louis, MO
If today goes the way I think it will, i'm quickly going to hate Shattenkirk.

Yes it's his right and he's earned it and all that, but as a fan of the team, i'm not sure how you can't be totally angry. We will end up being massively ****ed because of him.
 

Blanick

Winter is coming
Sponsor
Sep 20, 2011
16,366
11,607
St. Louis
Of course, but one is $6 million and the other is under $4, so I don't think it's a direct either or. I think if Army isn't trading Shattenkirk, a $6 million player in addition to Schwartz is likely out of the question.

True, this entire off season has been fumbled. We don't know exactly how much of it is Army's fault and how much is the trade/FA market. I am actually ok with him stalling with Shattenkirk until he gets what is fair value. However, you have got to get Schwartzy signed before today so we have a little bit better of an idea of what kind of money we have to work with.
 

Vladdy the Impaler

Moar Sobotka
Feb 20, 2015
3,269
1,106
The Lou
The fact that some want Perron back just indicates how truly overrated he was here in St. Louis.... :facepalm:

Why do we keep blowing money on horrible contracts for players like Lehtera, Berglund, or possibly Perron? Does Army really have a clue?
 

bleedblue1223

Registered User
Jan 21, 2011
52,916
16,355
If today goes the way I think it will, i'm quickly going to hate Shattenkirk.

Yes it's his right and he's earned it and all that, but as a fan of the team, i'm not sure how you can't be totally angry. We will end up being massively ****ed because of him.

Yes and no. Army didn't adjust to no one else overpaying like Edmonton was going to. Just because someone offers you 70K for a 50K car, doesn't mean it's worth 70K, it just means they were willing to overpay.
 
Apr 30, 2012
21,157
5,660
St. Louis, MO
If today goes the way I think it will, i'm quickly going to hate Shattenkirk.

Yes it's his right and he's earned it and all that, but as a fan of the team, i'm not sure how you can't be totally angry. We will end up being massively ****ed because of him.

No we won't. We'll get screwed because our GM is an absolutely moron. End of story. None of this is Shatty's fault. At all.
 

Note Worthy

History Made
Oct 26, 2011
10,114
3,722
St. Louis, MO
If today goes the way I think it will, i'm quickly going to hate Shattenkirk.

Yes it's his right and he's earned it and all that, but as a fan of the team, i'm not sure how you can't be totally angry. We will end up being massively ****ed because of him.

I understand Edmonton has been crap for a decade but they do have McDavid now who is going to be a generational talent. I would think more guys would be willing to sign there now for that reason.

Again, it is Shattenkirk's choice and he does have that right but I also have the right to be pissed about it. He royally screwed us big time.
 

Blanick

Winter is coming
Sponsor
Sep 20, 2011
16,366
11,607
St. Louis
If today goes the way I think it will, i'm quickly going to hate Shattenkirk.

Yes it's his right and he's earned it and all that, but as a fan of the team, i'm not sure how you can't be totally angry. We will end up being massively ****ed because of him.

I don't hate Shattenkirk. Yeah some of this frustration does stem from him and his refusal to sign with certain teams. However, that is his right. He put the time in and he has a right to pursue whatever team he wants when his contract expires. I can't blame him for telling the truth when asked the question, "Would you likely re-sign in Edmonton?"
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad