- Apr 2, 2008
- 27,185
- 16,211
Lundkvist has request a trade. I wonder if he could be a good target
Rangers would probably be looking for a young forward.
Should trade Boucher for him.
Lundkvist has request a trade. I wonder if he could be a good target
ThisChabot Subban
Sanderson Zub
Holden Hamonic
Brannstrom JBD
Lundkvist has request a trade. I wonder if he could be a good target
Yes, with camp starting in 10 days, it's looking like that is pretty likely now.Imo at this point we're probably more likely to pick up a Dman off waivers than trade for one. See how this group looks in the pre season and go from there.
Maybe straight up for Brannstrom but I think id prefer to just keep BrannstromLundkvist has request a trade. I wonder if he could be a good target
I was thinking the same thing but him being a RHD makes it a bit more interesting.Maybe straight up for Brannstrom but I think id prefer to just keep Brannstrom
Offensive defenseman with a good shot. Has struggled a bit in his transition to a full time NHL roster position.Lundkvist has request a trade. I wonder if he could be a good target
What do we have in the system for the left side ? Gets thin without Brannstrom. Kleven is the only other LD prospect coming in the next 2-3 years.I was thinking the same thing but him being a RHD makes it a bit more interesting.
Well right now we have Holden taking that third pair role, I think it's a lot easier to find bottom pair LD than top 4 RHD though, we are absolutely set for top 4 LHD for the foreseeable future, we need someone in the pool to become a top 4 RHD, maybe two if we can't extend Zub.What do we have in the system for the left side ? Gets thin without Brannstrom. Kleven is the only other LD prospect coming in the next 2-3 years.
I think Brannstrom is going to have a good year. I’m told he added some good weight this summer and looks thicker. The org to their credit slow played him and I think he will be a regular in the lineup if we don’t make anymore big moves.
I’m all for a Brannstrom Holden pairing along with Sanderson Haminic. I think that’s adequate /sWell right now we have Holden taking that third pair role, I think it's a lot easier to find bottom pair LD than top 4 RHD though, we are absolutely set for top 4 LHD for the foreseeable future, we need someone in the pool to become a top 4 RHD, maybe two if we can't extend Zub.
And I agree about Brannstrom potentially having a good year, I'm a big supporter of his, but I see LD as a position of strength and RD as a question mark after this season.
That's what I'd like to see, assuming we don't make a move for Chychrun.I’m all for a Brannstrom Holden pairing along with Sanderson Haminic. I think that’s adequate /s
Good weight on Brannstrom. You had to figure he wasn't finished filling out. I think he did very well last year in the PP QB role and we might well see his offence take off with a PP 2 that can actually scoreWhat do we have in the system for the left side ? Gets thin without Brannstrom. Kleven is the only other LD prospect coming in the next 2-3 years.
I think Brannstrom is going to have a good year. I’m told he added some good weight this summer and looks thicker. The org to their credit slow played him and I think he will be a regular in the lineup if we don’t make anymore big moves.
I think all the D will look better with a much deeper group of forwards.Good weight on Brannstrom. You had to figure he wasn't finished filling out. I think he did very well last year in the PP QB role and we might well see his offence take off with a PP 2 that can actually score
Key word = slotted. That applies on the D tooI think all the D will look better with a much deeper group of forwards.
We spent most of the year with essentially two 4th lines a 3rd a a first, now we can finally ice a full 12 forwards slotted correctly and that should take a lot of pressure off the d.
Agreed, but seeing as how a good number seem to think we still have gaping holes on D, I was looking to come at it from another angle.K
Key word = slotted. That applies on the D too
Even the slotting upfront is better.Agreed, but seeing as how a good number seem to think we still have gaping holes on D, I was looking to come at it from another angle.
I don’t see much point in adding a 5’10 RHD with DJ as the coach, particularly when we already have Brann, Thomson and JBD in the same age range and with similar pedigree.
Can you blame him, I mean imagine how much pressure he feels playing for the Rangers with that nameLundkvist has request a trade. I wonder if he could be a good target
Brannstrom breaking out this year would be a huge difference maker for us. I still think he might put it all together. He had a good stretch or two last season.Such a different game when you play from you tips than your heels.
The individual effect on players with the overall dramatic improvement up front on the team this year is going to be fascinating.
Could unlock Brannstrom for example - up tempo fast transition team constantly attacking with speed seems like his kind of game. He could be a different player for us this year.