Proposal: Free agency edition Trade Rumours/Proposals [MOD - Stay on Topic] 5

[Do Make Say Think]

The site becomes more ugly after every breaking upgrade.

I get no ads even when at work so I don't mind this new look!

I guess this upgrade came with a built-in adblocker.

 

[Pierre from Orleans]

I get no ads even when at work so I don't mind this new look!

I guess this upgrade came with a built-in adblocker.

At least I can dislike comments now

 

[frightenedinmatenum2]

At least I can dislike comments now

RIP Cody Ceci trade proposals.

 

[HoweHullOrr]

The site becomes more ugly after every breaking upgrade.

How can they FUP an upgrade so often?

Seems like the posts are much narrower than they used to be. It seems like I can't spread posts across the entire width of my display anymore.

Not sure what to make of this new version but at first glance not seeing the improvements at least from a end user functional and user interface point of view. Maybe when they fix some things this impression could change.

 

[Good in Osgoode]

How can they FUP an upgrade so often?

 

[Pierre from Orleans]

Seems like the posts are much narrower than they used to be. It seems like I can't spread posts across the entire my width of my display anymore.

Not sure what to make of this new version but at first glance not seeing the improvements at least from a end user functional and user interface point of view. Maybe when they fix some things this impression could change.

I give this site upgrade the same amount of respect I give the Montreal Canadiens

 

[xVolchenkov]

Functionally I’m sure the site is much better, but visually the updates are always downgrades.

On topic - if we bring someone in, I hope it’s a depth D. Forwards and in net were in good shape when everyone is healthy (well Forsberg stinks but I think we’re stuck with him for this year). Don’t love JBD or Hamonic on the back end but they’re whatever for now. Would prefer to have someone else in that spot thought, and even when healthy we need depth in that position IMO.

We don’t have the assets to go shopping for anything decent because of PD leaving the cupboards so empty.

EDIT - Forum is changing colors, I have hope.

 

[BonHoonLayneCornell]

Functionally I’m sure the site is much better, but visually the updates are always downgrades.

On topic - if we bring someone in, I hope it’s a depth D. Forwards and in net were in good shape when everyone is healthy (well Forsberg stinks but I think we’re stuck with him for this year). Don’t love JBD or Hamonic on the back end but they’re whatever for now. Would prefer to have someone else in that spot thought, and even when healthy we need depth in that position IMO.

We don’t have the assets to go shopping for anything decent because of PD leaving the cupboards so empty.

EDIT - Forum is changing colors, I have hope.

Much better now. Felt like we were taken over by Leafs colors.

Edit: Nvm, grey/red lasted for like one page load only, back to Leafs colors.

 

[SensFactor]

This new site design its awful. Some may like it but its ugly

 

[ottawagm]

This dark mode is terrible and light mode doesn't work?

 

[Micklebot]

This dark mode is terrible and light mode doesn't work?

All the themes from the old version don't work, so they went to default themes until they can recreate the old ones in a compatible format from what I understand.

 

[Do Make Say Think]

At least I can dislike comments now

I'm sad to report the ads are now on at work.

Thankfully I block all ads everywhere else

 

[Golden_Jet]

This dark mode is terrible and light mode doesn't work?

Dark mode is king, just eliminate light mode, sucks on the eyes.

 

[DrEasy]

The only upgrade I would care for would be not ignoring threads created by people I have on ignore.

 

[HSF]

send that Norris for JT Miller trade

 

[SensFactor]

send that Norris for JT Miller trade

Norris, Zub for JT Miller

 

[Icelevel]

This new site design its awful. Some may like it but its ugly

I like it. And it works much better/smoother.
Simple and fast is good.

 

[Byron Bitz]

Norris, Zub for JT Miller

If this is on the table and Staos hasn’t pulled the trigger on it yet then he’s not fit for this job.

 

[frightenedinmatenum2]

I wonder if the Greig extension is a precursor to a Norris trade.

Maybe they don't want to end up in a situation where they move Norris out, and both Greig and Pinto are not locked in long-term.

 

[UglyPuckling]

Not sure this helps, but hopefully it does. I filled in some of the void roster slots and came up with a $93.8 m, 22-player roster. Retained & buyout salaries were included (& were missing in your post).

Some players are in a different position versus your post. But, as long as they are identified & included in the roster spreadsheet somewhere, that’s what is most important for this exercise.

Orange shaded cells = a placeholder (TBD) or a current player with a new contract

Blue shaded cells = a RFA with his new contract

Yellow shaded cells - an ELC with a new contract

I think this spreadsheet is already quite optimistic because it includes a 2nd line winger @ $3.5 m, and Giroux for $3.5 m. I’d guess Giroux at $3.5 m would mean carry over bonuses for the following year.

View attachment 956692

Pinto is on his 3rd contract and is a much better player. I’d give Greig a 2 year deal at 1.5M year 1 and 2.5M year 2 for a 2M AAV.

I estimated Grieg’s new contract at $3 m/yr. It definitely wasn’t $2 m/yr and I was a little low at $3 m.

 

[GCK]

I estimated Grieg’s new contract at $3 m/yr. It definitely wasn’t $2 m/yr and I was a little low at $3 m.

I don’t either of us factored a 4 year deal in our defence

 

[Qward]

Norris, Zub for JT Miller

Then flip him to NYR for Lafreniere and Schneider?

 

[Burrowsaurus]

Then flip him to NYR for Lafreniere and Schneider?

Ny isn’t giving Vancouver what they want they’re not gonna give us what we want

 

[GCK]

5 centres signed for next year. Either Norris or Greig is getting moved after the season IMO.

 

[Qward]

Ny isn’t giving Vancouver what they want they’re not gonna give us what we want

Maybe what Vancouver wanted is not what Rangers were willing to give up, but they are for us?