I know you don't think Brown is a 2nd rounder type of player, but I think he is. Plus it's super watered down... Like they move up from a 5th to a 4th, even though it may only be like 10 spots. Also, if they want to move Benning or other forms of money, do it in another deal. Doesn't have to be in the Leafs' deal. I'm sure they could offer up Benning and get something from another team if they desperately want to open up cap. It shouldn't be our problem, because Brown is already on a sweet deal for them.
The Philly trade happens at the draft, so we still own Joshua's rights. I like Sanheim because he is a big body who can play a two-way game and replace Zaitsev in the top 4. He is a LHD, but he does play RD, and he is only turning 23 this year. He could explode beside Rielly next year, and I thought if anything, Philly would reject because they'd have so much love for him (or they'll say Zaitsev sucks or something like that). Rubtsov is not trending well, but he's probably the best prospect they'll be willing to give up and he's a guy who could turn into a great 3C for us with enough time. We can afford to give him that time. He's only 20, and was a first round pick not too long ago.
The guys you are a "no-guy" on are all depth players and guys who would have to fight for jobs, except maybe Sparks. The main thing is that they are all dirt cheap and can play a depth role effectively enough to compliment our top players, which is pretty much how our 4th line/bottom pairing should be anyways.
Hutch is back to be the number 3 and if Sparks really sucks next season, then Hutch is there to replace him. Otherwise, Aaltonen and Brouwer are just the guys I have winning the jobs, but they'll go up against DSP, Carcone, Timashov, Marchment, Bracco, Petan, Brooks, Korshkov, Engvall, etc. to win the job first. It's not like it's handed to them or anything, but I think they could form a very productive 4th line. A lot of people wanted Aaltonen on our 4th line this past year before he went back to the KHL. Well he had another great KHL season and would be perfect for a 4th line job this upcoming year. Plus since he can play all 3 forward spots, he's extra insurance on Gauthier as well. Brouwer is just the guy I picked out of a long list of cheap options because he is physical, has cup pedegree, has a solid defensive game (including PK ability) and wasn't terrible last year for Florida (12 goals and 21 points). He's older, but he's not bad. Otherwise, try Carpenter from Vegas, Acciari from Boston (although he may be more pricey), Hathaway from Calgary (but like I said, he's slow), etc.
Finally, I think Liljegren has shown enough to be ready for a bottom pairing role in the NHL (i.e. 16-17 minutes and maybe some special teams time), and I think he is ready for his next challenge. He was able to pick up a top pairing AHL role without too much difficulty, and while he should be putting up more production than he has been, I think he can take his next steps in the NHL rather than in the AHL. If he really is not ready by camp, there are other options, including offering PTO's to guys or (hopefully not, at least not over Borgman) using Holl. Personally, it's also about giving Duszak, Lindgren, Hollowell and Rasanen a chance in the AHL as well though. Rasanen may go back to Europe, in which case there may be room for a solid veteran insurance addition, but if he doesn't, I want to make sure we can offer up enough ice time to all of our RD prospects on the Marlies.