- Sep 17, 2007
- 24,969
- 22,939
Dude come on, they've all agreed now it was actually Emelin's fault.
You have that in writing? It seems to me that the butthurt is still pretty strong among that fanbase.
Dude come on, they've all agreed now it was actually Emelin's fault.
I mean, not letting go and moving on to a new scapegoat sounds exactly like Habs fans to me.This sounds ... not like Habs fans.
Losing Kreider is going to suck[/For the talent we have acquired this offseason...... I'll pack his bags.
I would say Strome has more upside than Namestnikov. He had strong season with us. Can play center and wing.Kreider is done here. Sad to say that *looks at avatar*
Names has to be on the outs too. Smith can be buried, and so can Beleskey. Opens up ~1.8 million. I'd say Strome, but I think he has less value that Namestnikov.
Maybe we get shocked and Shattenkirk is moved after the RHD market clears up.
Was really hoping for a better day for Ottawa. If they win the Cup, I win $15,000.
Hi popping in to ask a quick question regarding your situation.
With ~ 8.7M in cap space how are you expecting the Trouba, Buchnevich, and Lemieux contracts to unfold.
With Kravstov and Kakko likely coming in this year I would assume something has to give in your forward core or am I missing something?
Kreider is done here. Sad to say that *looks at avatar*
Names has to be on the outs too. Smith can be buried, and so can Beleskey. Opens up ~1.8 million. I'd say Strome, but I think he has less value that Namestnikov.
Maybe we get shocked and Shattenkirk is moved after the RHD market clears up.
True, it also may cause us to make hard decisions with our own drafted players ins 3-4 years. There’s always a flip side.
It was posted earlier that they cannot trade him.Theoretically, if Carolina is not sure they want to match the offer sheet, could they look to trade Aho for a better package than the 1st + 2nd + 3rd Montreal would give up and then acquiring team could match that offer sheet?
Basically, could the rangers trade for Aho and match that offer sheet in the next week
Theoretically, if Carolina is not sure they want to match the offer sheet, could they look to trade Aho for a better package than the 1st + 2nd + 3rd Montreal would give up and then acquiring team could match that offer sheet?
Basically, could the rangers trade for Aho and match that offer sheet in the next week
But they can set up a trade, match and then trade him, which is essentially the same thing.It was posted earlier that they cannot trade him.
Theoretically, if Carolina is not sure they want to match the offer sheet, could they look to trade Aho for a better package than the 1st + 2nd + 3rd Montreal would give up and then acquiring team could match that offer sheet?
Basically, could the rangers trade for Aho and match that offer sheet in the next week
STUFF IS GETTING DONEAccording to our CapFriendly page Crawley and Raddysh accepted their 1 year QOs
Shatty just didn't work out here. He was always kind of a reach as a first pairing D though and last year IMO it should have been him as #1 RD not Neal Pionk. He was the guy making the big $'s but for some reason that didn't happen. To me that's kind of telling.
I'd keep him and give him sheltered minutes as the third RD.Shatty just didn't work out here. He was always kind of a reach as a first pairing D though and last year IMO it should have been him as #1 RD not Neal Pionk. He was the guy making the big $'s but for some reason that didn't happen. To me that's kind of telling.
Where do you see that? Both should be entering the final year of their ELC. They shouldn't have been RFA...According to our CapFriendly page Crawley and Raddysh accepted their 1 year QOs