Maukkis
EZ4ENCE
- Mar 16, 2016
- 10,721
- 7,597
I think this would be the easy way out (or just delaying the pain), but if you keep Matthews and trade another core player (Marner), how on Earth are you going to deal with his extension next year?Toronto had a top heavy salary structure but I don't think Anaheim will run into that problem.
Zegras is going to pull what, 8x8?
Terry...6x6?
Matthews should be great or at worst good for 6 out of the 8 year extension at least, with no guarantee Fantilli or any other player they take will be remotely as good. Not sure what he would want to stay in Anaheim or maybe he'd embrace the warm weather + home country, 8 years, 12.7-13M?
More than likely Toronto just extends or attempts to extend Matthews but Anaheim has a ton of young talent at this point, this wouldn't be a move that hurts them. At some point it's okay to make a push and not try to collect picks forever.
Dubas tried committing to his stars early on and had to pay dearly for it in the case of Matthews (the AAV was about fine, but the term was a clear mistake from day 1). If you signal similar levels of commitment to Matthews again, what is stopping him from asking for 15 AAV, knowing that you're pretty much forced to pay? Honest, genuine question.
I think that if the Leafs are offered two good roster players (think top 6 F/top 4 D level) that are youngish and/or have team control left for AM before July 1st, they should seriously consider taking the deal then and there. It's not ideal by any means, but it helps the team contend next year and is a better solution to the contract headache than trading Marner. Such a deal would be very hard to find, though.