Zybalto
Registered User
- Dec 28, 2012
- 9,785
- 9,202
I’m sorry but no. What ‘ups’ has he had?
And he really has not been a net positive for them. He’s constantly on the ice when key goals are scored against. Last year his own teammates were berating him on the bench. He’s been flat out bad.
Would you leave a super talented guy off?
I guess it depends on who you’re leaving him off for.
He isn’t good defensive either. This is ancedotal. But I remember countless times of him making huge errors. In the Montreal series alone he gets a jock over glass penalty that leads to a loss. He’s caught going the wrong way on a rush that leads to another loss. Same thing in the most recent series in Boston.
He’s normally a solid player but he chokes.
McDavid produces in a losing cause. He puts up Gretz/Lemieux type playoff numbers. They are night and day different.
Marner taking any penalties is tough as he's one of the best PK forwards in the league and throwing in the Gally goal is perfect too as it perfectly paints my picture. I don't even think that weak floater was even a scoring chance. One of the softest playoff goals that year for sure. Marner even being there was just incidental to the fact Campbell followed the fine playoff tradition of Leafs goalies being useless in big games. Let's just say Price would have batted that one away with ease.
...and that was the only 5v5 goal the Habs managed to score with Marner on the ice.
If you put any weight on Marner there, it just shows the problem with the narrative. That gets saved 99.9% of the time.
If the Leafs can't score on an all world goalie on a heater...its on Marner....even if he leads series in setting up scoring chances for the snipers.
If the Leafs get scored on because Marner is in the box, it's on Marner, even if he isn't on the ice.
If the goalie gives up the worst goal of the series(and maybe playoffs) in a game 7, it's on Marner if he touched the puck last and obviously a reflection of poor defensive play.