Yes because he’s perfectly healthy. The down year was because of all the noise earlier. Hes also out of shapeWas he suddenly going to stop having a down year because he's on a different team?
Not having to suffer through that commercial is reward enough for watching the Sportsnet broadcast.Somebody not knowing who Gretzky is and Gretzky not caring is the most accurate shit ever.
I will love Mess forever.Mess, in your day, hockey was cool.
Ok? I don't know what that has to do with anything.Yes because he’s perfectly healthy.
The SOG are literally even.
Playing checkers in a room made out of sponges is more dangerous than what the US has done in this game.I think the US has controlled the play for almost the entire game and have more consistently been outplaying them, but Canada had a few flurries of chances that may have been higher danger
I kind of think this is what a good game looks like for this US team. Better goalie, better defense, less skill, grind out the win.All the sites have Canada way ahead in the underlying numbers. It seems accurate. They've had a couple of chances in a game where nothing has happened.
A good USA third would put them ahead.
seems like people are having fun watching a good game and you're the bitching? food for thought brahHating on a team when your team isn't even playing is just tiresome hate porn. I can't visit a GDT here without pessimism and hate? Can you watch a game that has nothing to do with the Rangers and not bitch about it?
Why is he having a down year then? His talent just decreased for a year? The truth is he’s not as good as he used to be.Ok? I don't know what that has to do with anything.
I'm not disagreeing that Canada has had the better of the chances, but in a game where a team has a 2-1 lead & the same amount of shots, they haven't been outplayed as bad as that dumb meter would like one to believe. This has been a pretty even game, IMO.Spamming unscreened shots from 25 feet out aren't valued the same as 2nd and 3rd rebounds.
FWIW, almost ALL of Canada's damage in that period came on 1 shift, but thats 1 more shift than the US had where they did much of anything sans' Larkin's post.
Everyone has down years.Why is he having a down year then? His talent just decreased for a year? The truth is he’s not as good as he used to be.
That was a bit Chytil likeWhat exactly did Jack Hughes expect was going to happen there?
makar and quinn make this a much different gameImagine tuning into this as a non-hockey fan on the premise that it's the very best the sport has to offer and this is the game that happens.