- Apr 25, 2006
- 52,538
- 57,151
Weak at center/defense, elite at wing/goaltending
Would be a fun team to watch though and would have a legit chance at winning this tournament
Weak at center/defense, elite at wing/goaltending
Not the same without themWeak at center/defense, elite at wing/goaltending
Would be a fun team to watch though and would have a legit chance at winning this tournament
Considering all the defencemen drafted high, they are on the verge of developing a crazy good shutdown core if all the players can reach most of their potential.Weak at center/defense, elite at wing/goaltending
Would be a fun team to watch though and would have a legit chance at winning this tournament
1996, 2004, and 2016 already happened, the NHL has gone backwards since then blud. It's about control. They (NHL) want revenue streams and won't partner up with IIHF to produce a legitimate World Cup-level tournament because they don't want Europe to be involved. That's why they are only playing four teams even with backlash comments from players like Kopitar, Draisaitl, and Pastrnak.make a tournament that is prestigious and meaningful you have to start somewhere.
I'm not your blud, plal. I dont give a shit who hosts the event, just give me best on best hockey. And you reinforced my point. There has been no consistency with the world cup, that's why no one considers it a meaningful. If the NHL wants to do this every 4 years it WILL become legitimate.1996, 2004, and 2016 already happened, the NHL has gone backwards since then blud. It's about control. They (NHL) want revenue streams and won't partner up with IIHF to produce a legitimate World Cup-level tournament because they don't want Europe to be involved. That's why they are only playing four teams even with backlash comments from players like Kopitar, Draisaitl, and Pastrnak.
Lay off the bull shark testosterone fam.I'm not your blud, plal. I dont give a shit who hosts the event, just give me best on best hockey. And you reinforced my point. There has been no consistency with the world cup, that's why no one considers it a meaningful. If the NHL wants to do this every 4 years it WILL become legitimate.
And Europe is involved with this tournament. Last I checked half the teams are from Europe. These are the only 4 countries that could legitimately compete with one another (excluding Russia, but that's a whole other issue). I have no interest in seeing Germany or Slovenia get blown out by the big dogs. Leave that for the Olympics.
Haha, I guess my first two sentences came off too strong. I was making a joke. I'm not that invested in this argument. Point is, I'm still excited to watch a best on best tournament even if it is a little gimicky. And the more tournaments like this the better,Lay off the bull shark testosterone fam.
You got me good lol.Haha, I guess my first two sentences came off too strong. I was making a joke. I'm not that invested in this argument. Point is, I'm still excited to watch a best on best tournament even if it is a little gimicky. And the more tournaments like this the better,