Former Canucks Thread 2023-24 Off-Season Edition

[Peen]

Two of his goals were right in front of the net. Sherwood has been a great addition but would you turn down another Sherwood?

Come on man

 

[Vector]

Watched a few shifts the other day and can confirm there's still zero commitment to the two-way game. It's quite remarkable how clueless he is in the defensive zone.

He will probably will get one more look by an NHL team, but really needs to be situated on an elite team with guys that can pick up the slack. He has the skill to be a lethal finisher. Maybe Edmonton or Tampa sign him?

Bad team scorer. Would be great next to Bedard.

 

[SeawaterOnIce]

Bad team scorer. Would be great next to Bedard.

 

[F A N]

Come on man

I'm trying to figure out whether you really take issue with what I wrote or just wanted to tell a joke.

 

[valkynax]

This guy had 2 goals this year, one of them was against us.

 

[Peen]

I'm trying to figure out whether you really take issue with what I wrote or just wanted to tell a joke.

Both. We are calling Sherwood Burrows lite rn which is such a huge compliment to Sherwood

When we traded Podkolzin, he was either on par or below Sprong, Hoglander, Bains, Sherwood, Karlsson, Bains, PDG on the winger depth chart.

And that's without mentioning the sure fire guys like Joshua, Boeser, Garland, Heinen, DeBrusk who had claimed 5/6 of the top nine winger roles.

Trading or committing to him &/or Hoglander was a decision they absolutely had to make early, and I think they made the right one with Podkolzin, but I thought they should have traded Hoglander before the season as well. I still disagree with MS that riding it out without an extension was a FAR better decision. There wasn't much downside from a trade aspect -> we're seeing it now, teams still want Hoglander.

 

[VanJack]

Podkolzin with goals in three straight games in Edmonton.....although I guess playing with Draisaitl on one of the top lines, helps a lot.

 

[F A N]

Both. We are calling Sherwood Burrows lite rn which is such a huge compliment to Sherwood

When we traded Podkolzin, he was either on par or below Sprong, Hoglander, Bains, Sherwood, Karlsson, Bains, PDG on the winger depth chart.

And that's without mentioning the sure fire guys like Joshua, Boeser, Garland, Heinen, DeBrusk who had claimed 5/6 of the top nine winger roles.

Well they didn't need to sign Sprong if what they wanted out of him isn't that of an offence-only 4th line winger. Thinking that he would either be a top 6 fit or bottom 6 fit under Tocchet is clearly a mistake that most everyone here foresaw.

Joshua was out for some time, Karlsson and Bains didn't require waivers, and PDG is older and clearly not a solution. Maybe the Canucks thought they would pick up a Lafferty type with the 4th? I suppose that I just saw Pods as among the team's top 13 forwards. A don't think Karlsson and Bains showed that he was better than Pods last season, especially in a 4th line role.

 

[Peen]

Well they didn't need to sign Sprong if what they wanted out of him isn't that of an offence-only 4th line winger. Thinking that he would either be a top 6 fit or bottom 6 fit under Tocchet is clearly a mistake that most everyone here foresaw.

Joshua was out for some time, Karlsson and Bains didn't require waivers, and PDG is older and clearly not a solution. Maybe the Canucks thought they would pick up a Lafferty type with the 4th? I suppose that I just saw Pods as among the team's top 13 forwards. A don't think Karlsson and Bains showed that he was better than Pods last season, especially in a 4th line role.

I thought this, but this absolutely was not the prevailing sentiment. People really thought he could turn it around — also it’s not as if it was a horrible bet because he was very easily moveable.

The Podkolzin trade preceded the Joshua diagnosis

Karlsson was better than Podkolzin in the coaches eyes.

Bains didn’t show he was better last year, but his performance this year has been better than what Podkolzin showed last year. Podkolzin had flatlined and Bains had upward trajectory — even if the ceiling is limited.

I don’t know. Sometimes players work in different places. It very obviously wasn’t going to work here. He needed a change of scenery. Edmonton is giving him a billion games with two top five players … obviously the puck is going to go in.

 

[MS]

Podkolzin is 'turning it around' because he's being spoonfed minutes next to Draisaitl.

If you took Sasson or Bains and gave them 25 games next to Draisaitl, they'd probably have 8 points, too.

 

[F A N]

I thought this, but this absolutely was not the prevailing sentiment. People really thought he could turn it around — also it’s not as if it was a horrible bet because he was very easily moveable.

Are we talking about Sprong here or Pods? MS's post confused me.

 

[racerjoe]

Podkolzin is 'turning it around' because he's being spoonfed minutes next to Draisaitl.

If you took Sasson or Bains and gave them 25 games next to Draisaitl, they'd probably have 8 points, too.

Yeah but if he isn’t with Draisaitl he has to play with that bum Mc-something….

 

[Ernie]

Podkolzin is 'turning it around' because he's being spoonfed minutes next to Draisaitl.

If you took Sasson or Bains and gave them 25 games next to Draisaitl, they'd probably have 8 points, too.

At least that many points. Podkolzin has played 2/3rd of his minutes with Draisatl. He's on pace for 27 points playing with one of the top 10 players in the league.

This inspired me to look at the numbers.. Podkolzin is 4th on the OIlers in ES points/60 for forwards.

He would be 10th on the Canucks. Kiefer Sherwood would be #1 on the Oilers, ahead of McDavid and Draisatl.

Remember when the Oilers loaded up on soft wingers in the offseason so they'd be an unstoppable offensive juggernaut?

LOL