Curufinwe
Registered User
- Feb 28, 2013
- 57,328
- 46,086
Makes sense. Laughton has term, position versatility, intangibles, and is better than Jeannot.Probably wants the jeannot return
Makes no sense for the blues. Everything that our GM recently said in an interview doesn't really support us trading for Laughton. His contract is good but the blues are looking for players 26 and younger apparently which Laughton is not. Plus our defense sucks so trading our 2 late firsts for a 3C doesn't make sense25th + 29th + Scandella for Laughton.
I mean we kinda do because it sounds specifically like they're talking about St. LouisWhat if the 1st was say 31st overall and the 2nd 63tf? Would you do that deal? We do not know the placements of the picks
That 2nd is the #39th pick in this year's draft.A couple years ago I remember a reporter saying that Adams was telling teams if they didn’t have a top 20 pick in the draft they were out on Ristolainen. It sounded completely insane. He was traded for the 14th (really 13th) pick and a 2nd later that day.
It happens.
What’s Lindholm costing then, three 1sts?
He does not have that kind of value. Probably in pool Ed retaining.Reported on the DFO Rundown podcast today by Seravelli.
Said Armstrong really liked him at the Worlds and made the offer of 25th or 29th and a future 2nd which Briere turned down.
Laughton is much cheaper than Provorov, and has an extra year of term. That's makes him more attractive for a lot of teams.Seravalli is talking out of his ass like usual here. No way Briere turns down a 1st for Laughton given what he got for Provolov. This screams BS thrown at the wall to get clicks to me
That's interesting. Obviously trading for Laughton makes no sense for a team that isn't really planning on making the playoffs for 2 or 3 years.Makes no sense for the blues. Everything that our GM recently said in an interview doesn't really support us trading for Laughton. His contract is good but the blues are looking for players 26 and younger apparently which Laughton is not. Plus our defense sucks so trading our 2 late firsts for a 3C doesn't make sense
Cap hits matter a lot in a flat cap league. It's pretty obvious, tbh.They traded provorov pratically for the same price ( if considerating value of cap dump) but not enough for laughton.... mmm not sure i really understand whats going on
A top 3 d in Provorov at 4,75 of cap hit or a middle 6 player at 3M... not sure cap hit its really a good reason lolThat's interesting. Obviously trading for Laughton makes no sense for a team that isn't really planning on making the playoffs for 2 or 3 years.
Cap hits matter a lot in a flat cap league. It's pretty obvious, tbh.